The Social RULES Do NOT Apply to Us
Lone Replicant wrote:
BlossX wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
Total BS.
IF we murdered all NTs..just marched them all off to death camps, and murdered the 98 percent of the human race who are NTs, and we were the only ones left, we would still have to learn to get along with each other. And we would end up evolving similar social rituals to those the liquidated NT population Similar amounts of polite dishonesty, and so forth.
IF we murdered all NTs..just marched them all off to death camps, and murdered the 98 percent of the human race who are NTs, and we were the only ones left, we would still have to learn to get along with each other. And we would end up evolving similar social rituals to those the liquidated NT population Similar amounts of polite dishonesty, and so forth.
Totally disagree.
As aspergers we would find a written agreement between us, to live each far from the other by at least 1 mile. Since we all know we are autistic nobody is going to break the rule, so we will live happily and free until the end of our NDs days.
Perfect!
I'm assuming there would still be provisions for the inevitable hospital visit, prescription fills, grocery procurement, etc., right?
ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
I don't mean that in the sense that we're "above the law."
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
Why the hell would I wanna treat anyone as less than equal? The fact that at least US society is deeply ableist (the same way it's deeply racist, deeply patriarchal, deeply unequal and exploitative in terms of class differences. among other Isms) doesn't give me some f****d up desire to turn the tables on NT society and wish we the ND community were the Brahmins of this f****d up caste system! Why the f**k would I want that, or why would anyone for that matter?! If you think fighting social hierarchies by turning the social order upside down is some kind of "social (or poetic) justice" or wtf ever, then you still believe in caste systems, which it should go w/o saying, are feudal social relics, like the British royal family and the rest of their stupid nobility. Most people don't have time for that s**t any more! We've got alot more pressing problems in the world like climate change, keeping a roof over our heads and food in our bellies and whatnot, as the large majority of Millennials and Gen Zers will tell you.
If you want equality, fine cool, hopefully we're all down w/that. If not, GTFOH!
breaks0 wrote:
ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
I don't mean that in the sense that we're "above the law."
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
Why the hell would I wanna treat anyone as less than equal? The fact that at least US society is deeply ableist (the same way it's deeply racist, deeply patriarchal, deeply unequal and exploitative in terms of class differences. among other Isms) doesn't give me some f****d up desire to turn the tables on NT society and wish we the ND community were the Brahmins of this f****d up caste system! Why the f**k would I want that, or why would anyone for that matter?! If you think fighting social hierarchies by turning the social order upside down is some kind of "social (or poetic) justice" or wtf ever, then you still believe in caste systems, which it should go w/o saying, are feudal social relics, like the British royal family and the rest of their stupid nobility. Most people don't have time for that s**t any more! We've got alot more pressing problems in the world like climate change, keeping a roof over our heads and food in our bellies and whatnot, as the large majority of Millennials and Gen Zers will tell you.
If you want equality, fine cool, hopefully we're all down w/that. If not, GTFOH!
I agree with you, except for the 'GTFO' part, since I respect the right for people to have their opinions.
I believe in a social rule where everyone treats others with the mentality of optimising people's self-esteem. In fact, self-esteem is the 2nd highest level in Maslow's hierarchy of needs, so I think this would be a great rule to adopt.
Antrax wrote:
Some autistics seem to believe that because our social skills are diminished by biological happenstance that social rules are inherently BS. I am not one such autistic. I may be underdeveloped at interacting with people, but I understand its importance.
In an autistic-friendly world -- or an autistic-friendly subculture -- there would still be social rules, but a somewhat different set of social rules. See the separate threads Autistic-friendly social skills vs. blending in with NT's and Social rules of autistic-friendly social spaces?.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
kraftiekortie wrote:
That's Sheldon Cooper's way of relating to people. It's not most people's way of relating to people.
I quite like the idea of drawing up entire social contracts for interactions with someone living in close proximity to me. Yes, there's beauty in guesswork in getting to know someone but the basic stuff like vehement pet peeves makes it a whole lot easier.
_________________
I wondered, ". . . So therefore I exist."
ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
I'm the OP and I never said it wasn't important. I was saying we're below, we're second-class. Bound to their rules, obviously no choice in that and no way around it. The rules they have for each other vs. the rules they have for dealing with us.
I agree with your observation, which is the reason we need to build an autistic-friendly subculture (including autistic-friendly workplaces).
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
breaks0 wrote:
ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
I don't mean that in the sense that we're "above the law."
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
Why the hell would I wanna treat anyone as less than equal? The fact that at least US society is deeply ableist (the same way it's deeply racist, deeply patriarchal, deeply unequal and exploitative in terms of class differences. among other Isms) doesn't give me some f****d up desire to turn the tables on NT society and wish we the ND community were the Brahmins of this f****d up caste system!
As far as I can tell, ezbzbfcg2 didn't actually advocate that we somehow invert the hierarchy, at least not here in this thread. He didn't actually advocate anything in particular, other than to reject the idea that we can ever fit in with NT society.
To ezbzbfcg2: What solution do you advocate, if any?
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
Mona Pereth wrote:
breaks0 wrote:
Why the hell would I wanna treat anyone as less than equal? The fact that at least US society is deeply ableist (the same way it's deeply racist, deeply patriarchal, deeply unequal and exploitative in terms of class differences. among other Isms) doesn't give me some f****d up desire to turn the tables on NT society and wish we the ND community were the Brahmins of this f****d up caste system! Why the f**k would I want that, or why would anyone for that matter?! If you think fighting social hierarchies by turning the social order upside down is some kind of "social (or poetic) justice" or wtf ever, then you still believe in caste systems, which it should go w/o saying, are feudal social relics, like the British royal family and the rest of their stupid nobility. Most people don't have time for that s**t any more! We've got alot more pressing problems in the world like climate change, keeping a roof over our heads and food in our bellies and whatnot, as the large majority of Millennials and Gen Zers will tell you.
If you want equality, fine cool, hopefully we're all down w/that. If not, GTFOH!
If you want equality, fine cool, hopefully we're all down w/that. If not, GTFOH!
As far as I can tell, ezbzbfcg2 didn't actually advocate that we somehow invert the hierarchy, at least not here in this thread. He didn't actually advocate anything in particular, other than to reject the idea that we can ever fit in with NT society.
To ezbzbfcg2: What solution do you advocate, if any?
You're correct. That poster was very presumptuous and very off target. His response completely misrepresents everything I've said and shows his own ignorance.
As for what I advocate, I have no real solution for you. Ask the "successful" Aspies here. It boils down to perpetually masking, or somehow being really good at something or having government or familial funding.
But even then, even if all needs are met and you can eek out a pleasant existence, you're still at the mercy of this system. It can never be overcome. It's our lot in life and the rules they have will never be extended to us. We'll always be the second class to the NT collective.
ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
I don't mean that in the sense that we're "above the law."
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
I have not read all the responses on this thread but yeah, I feel this very much.
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
_________________
"I'm bad and that's good. I'll never be good and that's not bad. There's no one I'd rather be than me."
Wreck It Ralph
ezbzbfcg2 wrote:
I don't mean that in the sense that we're "above the law."
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
No. Quite the contrary.
Everything we've been taught has been rules for NTs-by NTs, and they all seemingly know that we're excluded from normalcy. They expect us to respect them (godforbid we should break the rules and treat them as less-than), but they all seemingly know it's okay not to extend us the same courtesy. It's yet another rule, this one not spoken.
In our younger years, we may have been a bit baffled by this oblivious contradiction on their part. We must respect them, but it's acceptable among their ilk not to reciprocate. And how dare we hold them to their own standards or call them out on their hypocrisy. One of their rules is that it's okay for them to treat us "less than equal" than they treat each other, but we're not allowed to respond in kind.
You all know what I mean (and if you really don't, you've been insulated). Don't pretend otherwise. You know I'm right.
We're below the law.
This is true. However, it's never too late to start testing boundaries.
I'm in trouble right now. My biggest challenge is emotional regulation. I don't flip out, or bring an AK47 to settle the score. But, I've begun to speak my peace. I'm a nurse. I require a certain amount of structure, which I create for myself, to have my day go smoothly. When another nurse interferes with that, I may (or may not, it depends ) tell her to go away. I don't do it unnecessarily. If someone is asking for help with their day, I will do my best to help. But, if they are chaotic, or gossiping, I tell them to beat it! They don't like that? Too bad! It works... I don't say, 'go away, you stupid ****!' I just say, 'go away.'
Aaaand, I get in trouble. But, I'm not stopping.
_________________
Disagreeing with you doesn't mean I hate you, it just means we disagree.
Neurocognitive exam in May 2019, diagnosed with ASD, Asperger's type in June 2019.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Following Rules |
07 Nov 2024, 4:37 pm |
Breaking rules |
07 Nov 2024, 6:23 am |
New Social Workers |
15 Nov 2024, 12:16 am |
Social Result |
15 Dec 2024, 6:28 pm |