Is asperger necessarily a disability?

Page 4 of 6 [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

carlos55
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Mar 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,941

15 Dec 2020, 1:37 pm

magz wrote:
The topic is about AS, a diagnosis that excludes "serious intellectual disability".


The same rules apply just remove ID, the world is built on capitalism which is Darwinian in nature.

Those who are most able will get the best jobs form the most relationships and earn the most money.

Those who have handicaps like AS are more likely to be unemployed on welfare and living in a bad neighborhood.

They are not going to give up their capitalist system for us.


_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."

- George Bernie Shaw


KT67
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,807

15 Dec 2020, 1:49 pm

carlos55 wrote:
KT67 wrote:
Yes but it needs the social model to fix it rather than the medical model.


Well that’s a personal thing some people may desire future biological treatments that make their disability go away as some have worse symptoms.

Someone on here once used the word Auti verse to describe those on the spectrum who believe everyone has the same level of functioning and views the world in the same way.

Also as naturalplastic alluded to the world is the world.

I say the 99% is unlikely to change dramatically to suit us 1% that’s just the way it is.

Thinking otherwise is just end of the rainbow stuff to waste time on.


I think it's a spectrum and it's a spectrum including everyone and people like me are quite similar to geeky NTs. So all it would take would be pathologising of less geeky NTs to see the inclusion of people like me.

I can imagine after covid, society becomes more introverted.

Society has been weird in recent generations & it's not a good thing. Dumbed down, less hobbies, more obsession with consumption & being 'cool'.


_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him


Vivianalves
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

Joined: 11 Dec 2020
Gender: Female
Posts: 6

15 Dec 2020, 1:59 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
KT67 wrote:
firemonkey wrote:
I wonder why people pursue a dx if they truly believe it is not a disability. With diagnoses of Asperger's and schizophrenia/schizoaffective I most definitely see myself as disabled. How much of that disability is down to the Asperger's I wouldn't like to say.

What I do know is that without support I do a lot less well than with support. I've never worked. I have no F2F friends. I'm not homo superior/the next stage in human evolution as some like to claim about themselves.


Why do you assume everyone who knows they're autistic pursued a diagnosis?

I don't consider my mind to be disabled at least as far as autism is concerned.

My mother considered it enough of a hindrance to me within the social setting of a secondary school to pursue a diagnosis. Her. Not me. Only for secondary school too - they tried to get her to get me a diagnosis earlier on and she said 'no, that is my child, that is her personality not a disorder. Her disorder is dyspraxia'. Because being autistic provided little to no problems in primary school.

I have mixed opinions on the medical versus social models of disability. I do not believe that autism is necessarily a disability. However, in current society, it definitely disables you. There's a difference. Society can change and has changed. Something like being paralyzed will always be a disability in my opinion.

I think the hyper social, anti-intellectual, overly sensory saturated world we live in at present is bad for a lot of people. I think an ideal world for most would be a balance between that and the overly formal/stuffy world of the Victorians.


In other words:

If pigs had wings then they could fly, and if my grandmother had testicles she would be my grandfather. And if society were radically different some higher functioning autistics would not be disabled.

True, but so what? For the moment society is what it is. So autism is a disability.


The problem is that some higher functioning autistics ONLY have problems because other people think they are odd and threat them badly. Its much more similar to the gay situation than to the people in wheelchair situation. People in the wheelchair cant move on their on. They need a device built by others to move around. Even if all people were nice to them, even if all people understood them, they would still need help from others. Gay people also had more problems than others only because other people didnt understand them and threated them badly. They were on DSM as " disorders" as well, but they fought to not be there anymore, because they wanted to be accepted for who they were. Gays still have much more problems for being gays. They are often bullied, in many countries, they cant marry their boyfriends, they cant have children from their own blood with the people they love. But they arent called disabled because of this.

There are also down syndrome people that have normal IQ. They are still labeled disabled people, but that doesnt make sense, because down people are generaly only disabled because their low IQ. Even if most down people are disabled, that doesnt mean THEY are disabled.



Jakki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,949
Location: Outter Quadrant

15 Dec 2020, 2:05 pm

Some of these things listed in some of the above sound very familiar to me .. aswell .


_________________
Diagnosed hfa
Loves velcro,
Quote:
where ever you go ,there you are


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

15 Dec 2020, 3:25 pm

carlos55 wrote:
magz wrote:
The topic is about AS, a diagnosis that excludes "serious intellectual disability".


The same rules apply just remove ID, the world is built on capitalism which is Darwinian in nature.

Those who are most able will get the best jobs form the most relationships and earn the most money.

Those who have handicaps like AS are more likely to be unemployed on welfare and living in a bad neighborhood.

They are not going to give up their capitalist system for us.

I'm living in not-exactly-capitalist system and largely non-capitalist society... it exists 8O


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Jakki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,949
Location: Outter Quadrant

15 Dec 2020, 4:49 pm

Guess it might depend on how severely your Autism has affected you ... and how well you cope with those liabilities
Or if a person is able to cope at all . Generally humans are pretty adaptable species as I understand , but society
By itself , can be a serious impediment to ones ability to adapt . So it may very well be considered a serious disability


_________________
Diagnosed hfa
Loves velcro,
Quote:
where ever you go ,there you are


Double Retired
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2020
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,155
Location: U.S.A.         (Mid-Atlantic)

15 Dec 2020, 5:50 pm

KT67 wrote:
I think it's a spectrum and it's a spectrum including everyone and people like me are quite similar to geeky NTs.
Vivianalves wrote:
The problem is that some higher functioning autistics ONLY have problems because other people think they are odd and threat them badly.
Yes and yes.

I worked in computers. I looked a lot like those around me. I have good academic and work histories. I got along well with computers and sometimes solved problems those around me could not. What I now know were my Aspie traits lead me to concentrate on the technical part of my jobs rather than trying to climb the managerial ranks--but I was surrounded by lots of other non-managers and I can't believe all of them were auties.
KT67 wrote:
Yes but it needs the social model to fix it rather than the medical model.
Any "accommodations" I would want for my "disability" would fall under that. Mainly, I wish people had not treated me badly so often.

In the last decade I've decided I want one other "accommodation"--I want doctors to tell me anything nontrivial in writing, not just say it and expect me to remember it. But I had that preference years before I found out I was an Aspie, and at least one primary care practitioner I saw did it for me even though I had not been identified as an Aspie. Frankly, I still don't know whether that was their standard operating procedure or something they did to make me happy.

I only got my autism assessment because I was curious. And while a lawyer might or might not say I am "disabled" I think if I technically am it would be based solely on me having the label ASD-1.


_________________
When diagnosed I bought champagne!
I finally knew why people were strange.


CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 116,877
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

15 Dec 2020, 10:36 pm

In my case it's a disability. I have trouble making it to the toilet in the #2 department. That would be an obstacle in finding employment. I also have poor social skills. As you can see from my posts, I'm not the most polite or graceful member on WP. I'm very to the point, though I don't mean any harm by being so. I also have anxiety due to my Gender Dysphoria. As handicapped as I might be, I'm still very happy to be alive.

Like carlos55, I also prefer the word handicap/handicapped. It's easier for me to say. It has less syllables than disability.


_________________
The Family Enigma


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,267
Location: Pacific Northwest

16 Dec 2020, 1:02 am

Quote:
The problem is that some higher functioning autistics ONLY have problems because other people think they are odd and threat them badly.


And these people would be "normal" under the doctor's eye and they won't get diagnosed. Unless they are in a right situation where they needed to be diagnosed like I had to for my school because they were trying to put me in a behavior class. It's a matter of seeing the right doctor as well.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

16 Dec 2020, 7:33 am

Vivianalves wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
KT67 wrote:
firemonkey wrote:
I wonder why people pursue a dx if they truly believe it is not a disability. With diagnoses of Asperger's and schizophrenia/schizoaffective I most definitely see myself as disabled. How much of that disability is down to the Asperger's I wouldn't like to say.

What I do know is that without support I do a lot less well than with support. I've never worked. I have no F2F friends. I'm not homo superior/the next stage in human evolution as some like to claim about themselves.


Why do you assume everyone who knows they're autistic pursued a diagnosis?

I don't consider my mind to be disabled at least as far as autism is concerned.

My mother considered it enough of a hindrance to me within the social setting of a secondary school to pursue a diagnosis. Her. Not me. Only for secondary school too - they tried to get her to get me a diagnosis earlier on and she said 'no, that is my child, that is her personality not a disorder. Her disorder is dyspraxia'. Because being autistic provided little to no problems in primary school.

I have mixed opinions on the medical versus social models of disability. I do not believe that autism is necessarily a disability. However, in current society, it definitely disables you. There's a difference. Society can change and has changed. Something like being paralyzed will always be a disability in my opinion.

I think the hyper social, anti-intellectual, overly sensory saturated world we live in at present is bad for a lot of people. I think an ideal world for most would be a balance between that and the overly formal/stuffy world of the Victorians.


In other words:

If pigs had wings then they could fly, and if my grandmother had testicles she would be my grandfather. And if society were radically different some higher functioning autistics would not be disabled.

True, but so what? For the moment society is what it is. So autism is a disability.


The problem is that some higher functioning autistics ONLY have problems because other people think they are odd and threat them badly. .


That is still "if pigs had wings they could fly".

If you lack the ability to seem normal in society without extra effort then you are at a disadvantage. So the cause of that disadvantage is a disability. Its a spectrum so the disadvantage/disability becomes slight at the high end. But its still there.

I dont 100 percent disagree. I am optimistic that...as society gets more autism awareness, and as science learns more about autism- its strengths as well as it weakness - that society will become more accomidating to autistics. Some IT companies are already seeking autistic employees.

Thirty years from now, or even ten years from now, society and psychology might be evolved enough so that you could indulge in the luxury of believing that "autism is not a disability". But not now.



KT67
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,807

16 Dec 2020, 7:54 am

I think people in the past before HFA was considered a disability were more accommodating of middle class guys who in this day and age would be considered HFA/disabled.

I think society has gone downhill in terms of its lack of structure.

I wish we could live in a world as distant and formal as the Victorians did but with more lgbt acceptance and more feminism. It doesn't feel right to me to be hugging every afab person I meet - that should be reserved for family and sweethearts.

I also hope for a day, and maybe under lockdown it's arrived, where having hobbies wasn't seen as weird or childish. Not just pure consumption, social media for the young and TV for the old/middle aged, but actual hobbies.


_________________
Not actually a girl
He/him


carlos55
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Mar 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,941

16 Dec 2020, 8:45 am

KT67 wrote:
I think people in the past before HFA was considered a disability were more accommodating of middle class guys who in this day and age would be considered HFA/disabled.

I think society has gone downhill in terms of its lack of structure.

I wish we could live in a world as distant and formal as the Victorians did but with more lgbt acceptance and more feminism. It doesn't feel right to me to be hugging every afab person I meet - that should be reserved for family and sweethearts.

I also hope for a day, and maybe under lockdown it's arrived, where having hobbies wasn't seen as weird or childish. Not just pure consumption, social media for the young and TV for the old/middle aged, but actual hobbies.


I think it’s a bit of a myth about the Victorian age being tolerant to those with disabilities.

Back then anyone on the spectrum who wasn’t locked up in an institution at a young age where they will be prodded and left to die would have been ignored and labeled an idiot or moron.

One positive thing out of the Covid 19 crisis is the increase in work from home jobs like never before for those that are AS and able.

However the downside will be if you take away the social contact it will decrease our poor social skills even more.

I find my social skills like a very poor muscle, a little bit of prolonged isolation and they start getting really bad and anxiety increases when I have to face people.

Another problem with no social contact is it just highlights other issues that were forgotten about with AS like poor concentration, learning, time stimming and brain fog that can effect ability to sustain a job.


_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."

- George Bernie Shaw


JP210168
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2015
Posts: 39
Location: US

16 Dec 2020, 10:58 am

It really depends on the person and any extra comorbidities they may have, which as I've gathered so far are a big factor in determining how disabled they are in day to day life.

Regardless of that though, some here are able to plow through all of it and excel in their fields of interest and/or navigate the world fairly well.



Double Retired
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2020
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,155
Location: U.S.A.         (Mid-Atlantic)

16 Dec 2020, 12:07 pm

If you've met one autistic you've met one autistic.

I have been formally diagnosed as meeting the criteria for ASD-1 and the evaluation report notes I would've met the older criteria for Asperger's Syndrome. This diagnosis is consistent with my reality; if you got to know me I think you'd see my ASD-1 traits, too.

And I am an example of a mild autistic who did make it through life OK. I was 64 before I had any idea I might be autistic and chose to get an assessment because I was curious. The assessment was only required to satisfy my curiosity. I was already comfortably retired and happily married.

I admit I've been incredibly lucky. Where I landed on the spectrum, plus an upbringing I would now characterize as Autism Acceptance, plus many other lucky breaks all worked together to my advantage.


_________________
When diagnosed I bought champagne!
I finally knew why people were strange.


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

16 Dec 2020, 1:03 pm

Double Retired wrote:
If you've met one autistic you've met one autistic.

I have been formally diagnosed as meeting the criteria for ASD-1 and the evaluation report notes I would've met the older criteria for Asperger's Syndrome. This diagnosis is consistent with my reality; if you got to know me I think you'd see my ASD-1 traits, too.

And I am an example of a mild autistic who did make it through life OK. I was 64 before I had any idea I might be autistic and chose to get an assessment because I was curious. The assessment was only required to satisfy my curiosity. I was already comfortably retired and happily married.

I admit I've been incredibly lucky. Where I landed on the spectrum, plus an upbringing I would now characterize as Autism Acceptance, plus many other lucky breaks all worked together to my advantage.


If youve met one blind person then youve met one blind person.

you're like Stevie Wonder. Lucky. But like blindness its still a disability.



carlos55
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Mar 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,941

16 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
Double Retired wrote:
If you've met one autistic you've met one autistic.

I have been formally diagnosed as meeting the criteria for ASD-1 and the evaluation report notes I would've met the older criteria for Asperger's Syndrome. This diagnosis is consistent with my reality; if you got to know me I think you'd see my ASD-1 traits, too.

And I am an example of a mild autistic who did make it through life OK. I was 64 before I had any idea I might be autistic and chose to get an assessment because I was curious. The assessment was only required to satisfy my curiosity. I was already comfortably retired and happily married.

I admit I've been incredibly lucky. Where I landed on the spectrum, plus an upbringing I would now characterize as Autism Acceptance, plus many other lucky breaks all worked together to my advantage.


If youve met one blind person then youve met one blind person.

you're like Stevie Wonder. Lucky. But like blindness its still a disability.


Yes but a more accurate metaphor is Nearsightedness (myopia), some people need spectacles to see the tv or drive, some actually like wearing glasses as they think it makes them look intellectual.

Then you have extreme myopia which can make you disabled blind as a bat needing a white stick & guide dog.

Imagine having to wear spectacles for watching tv and presuming myopia is not a problem doesnt need curing & everyone is on the same disability level as oneself & you have a perfect metaphor for what some ND advocates argue.


_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."

- George Bernie Shaw