If There Was a War Between NTs & Autistics.......
LostInSpace wrote:
Geez, then why not consider gender a race? That's genetically determined too!
Because that particular difference in genetics is already defined as "gender" of course.
Quote:
I've seen enough extreme viewpoints on both sides. I've had enough of the "I'm better than you" mentality on both sides.
And the question wasn't "is it a good idea" but rather if there was a war and you HAD to choose sides which would you pick?
_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane
RadiantAspie wrote:
Kitsy wrote:
I agree with you. Also, when it comes to drugs like ritalin handed out to children, it's not as beneficial to the children as it is the parents because long term uses of the drug has serious side effects. Short term solution to long term problem. What is the cure for autism anyway? do they mean the usual handing out of drugs and that form of treatment or a real cure?
Well, first of all, ritalin is very help if applied properly. The issue with ritalin revolves mostly around the ADD/ADHD controversies (in that they are using an arbitrary definition of such in order to be able to boost sales). So the issue here is not quite the same. And yes, there are people who do overuse drugs, but that is a different matter.
And there is no cure for autism, just treatments of various sorts, ranging from Applied Behavior Analysis to drugs. They are not intended as a cure as far as I'm know...
What do you mean by applied properly? Ritalin is something you swallow not a lotion. I'm basing this information on a few people who had taken ritalin for a long time and ended up having other psychological issues and social difficulties which one very bright person claimed it was the ritalin he had taken for so long and I'm inclined to believe him. I've tried it a few times and I can see how it can be dangerous.
Oh and for the record:
Quote:
We are debating whether or not autism should be considered a race, and the answer to that question is obvious to most.
Flat earth argument.
_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane
Kitsy wrote:
What do you mean by applied properly? Ritalin is something you swallow not a lotion. I'm basing this information on a few people who had taken ritalin for a long time and ended up having other psychological issues and social difficulties which one very bright person claimed it was the ritalin he had taken for so long and I'm inclined to believe him. I've tried it a few times and I can see how it can be dangerous.
Applied properly meaning not overdosing, using it based on symptoms, you know, just like you use any other form of medication. Ritalin is used for people with some sort of attention deficits so that they can help them focus, and to reduce impulsive behavior.
And you have nothing but anecedotes to back your claim up. Have you thought that there might be some underlying cause behind his social difficulties. Has he been overdosing, or not taking the doses as prescribed by his doctor? It would be better to rule out all other possibilities before you make such a conclusion like that first. And of course understand what exactly he has, it may be possible that he's taking the wrong medication....
_________________
Philosophy: A good way to demonstrate our ability to make stuff up.
Religion: A good way to demonstrate our ability to believe things that just aren't so.
Fraya wrote:
Flat earth argument.
Nope, I'm not even going to let you have that one. It is not a flat Earth argument, I have clearly provided sources and supported my position.
Do you, Fraya, have anything other than anecedotes, misconceptions/misunderstandings, or emotional biases to support yours?
_________________
Philosophy: A good way to demonstrate our ability to make stuff up.
Religion: A good way to demonstrate our ability to believe things that just aren't so.
Quote:
Has he been overdosing, or not taking the doses as prescribed by his doctor? It would be better to rule out all other possibilities before you make such a conclusion like that first. And of course understand what exactly he has, it may be possible that he's taking the wrong medication....
Of course the main problem is that the doctor doesn't know for certain what to give or what dosage to use either.
Its a guessing game for them.. trial and error with the errors usually causing more trouble and risk.
I think the point here is that the doctors are prescribing drugs to children to make the children lower maintenance for the parents benefit rather than the child's at the cost of the child's development and/or health.
_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane
RadiantAspie wrote:
Fraya wrote:
Flat earth argument.
Nope, I'm not even going to let you have that one. It is not a flat Earth argument, I have clearly provided sources and supported my position.
You state that something is true because the majority believes it to be true.. thats a flat earth argument.. and I have yet to see a source or any sort of support showing that a group of people showing similar genetic traits that are highly dissimilar from the rest of humanity cannot be classified as a separate race.
Quote:
Do you, Fraya, have anything other than anecedotes, misconceptions/misunderstandings, or emotional biases to support yours?
I haven't really stated anything as fact.. I mostly asked questions and refuted your answers due to logical fallacies.
Bah sorry for the double post.
_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane
RadiantAspie wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Check the opinions of Tony Attwood or Simon Baron-Cohen. Their opinions easily trump those of the Neo-Freudian quacks who dominate the psychiatric profession.
This is based on a few misconceptions:
First, Freud's theories is not accepted by any psychiatric or psychological practice.
Second, Tony Attwood does not support your position at all. Just read his books more carefully, since they are about how to deal and allieviate some of the symptoms.
Third, Simon-Baron Cohen proposes that Aspergers Syndrome, not the necessarily the whole ASD spectrum, is an extreme of the male brain. But this does not mean that it is necessarily a good thing, or a normal thing.
You are wrong.
Tony Attwood wrote:
From my clinical experience I consider that children and adults with Aspergers Syndrome have a different, not defective, way of thinking.
The person usually has a strong desire to seek knowledge, truth and perfection with a different set of priorities than would be expected with other people. There is also a different perception of situations and sensory experiences. The overriding priority may be to solve a problem rather than satisfy the social or emotional needs of others.
The person values being creative rather than co-operative.
The person with Aspergers syndrome may perceive errors that are not apparent to others, giving considerable attention to detail, rather than noticing the “big picture”.
The person is usually renowned for being direct, speaking their mind and being honest and determined and having a strong sense of social justice.
The person may actively seek and enjoy solitude, be a loyal friend and have a distinct sense of humour.
However, the person with Aspergers Syndrome can have difficulty with the management and expression of emotions.
Children and adults with Aspergers syndrome may have levels of anxiety, sadness or anger that indicate a secondary mood disorder. There may also be problems expressing the degree of love and affection expected by others. Fortunately, we now have successful psychological treatment programs to help manage and express emotions.
Tony Attwood
The person usually has a strong desire to seek knowledge, truth and perfection with a different set of priorities than would be expected with other people. There is also a different perception of situations and sensory experiences. The overriding priority may be to solve a problem rather than satisfy the social or emotional needs of others.
The person values being creative rather than co-operative.
The person with Aspergers syndrome may perceive errors that are not apparent to others, giving considerable attention to detail, rather than noticing the “big picture”.
The person is usually renowned for being direct, speaking their mind and being honest and determined and having a strong sense of social justice.
The person may actively seek and enjoy solitude, be a loyal friend and have a distinct sense of humour.
However, the person with Aspergers Syndrome can have difficulty with the management and expression of emotions.
Children and adults with Aspergers syndrome may have levels of anxiety, sadness or anger that indicate a secondary mood disorder. There may also be problems expressing the degree of love and affection expected by others. Fortunately, we now have successful psychological treatment programs to help manage and express emotions.
Tony Attwood
Looks like Attwood does support my position. We have our own special strengths, we are not defective, but we may have some difficulty in social interaction.
Autism Research Center at Cambridge University (Baron-Cohen) wrote:
Are AS (Asperger Syndrome) or HFA (High Functioning Autism) disabilities?
Both can be thought of as a personality style in which the individual does not ‘tune in’ naturally to people and is more attracted by objects, systems, and how things work
Both involve strengths in attention to detail, and can be associated with talent in areas such as mathematics, science, fact-collecting or rule-based subjects
Both are disabilities only in environments where the individual is expected to be both sociable and a good communicator
Both can be thought of as a personality style in which the individual does not ‘tune in’ naturally to people and is more attracted by objects, systems, and how things work
Both involve strengths in attention to detail, and can be associated with talent in areas such as mathematics, science, fact-collecting or rule-based subjects
Both are disabilities only in environments where the individual is expected to be both sociable and a good communicator
Baron-Cohen also seems to support my position. Asperger's/Autism are only disadvantages in certain specific contexts, but as NTs dominate the world through sheer force of numbers, they can ensure that they are always (or almost always) in the types of situations which they prefer (emphasis on social skills, less need for attention to detail etc). Us Aspies do not have the same luxury.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Kitsy wrote:
2ukenkerl wrote:
Kitsy wrote:
2ukenkerl wrote:
I would have no choice! I would HAVE to be on the autistic side. My weaknesses are ones most autistics have, and I have been treated badly by NTs all the same.
and this right here about the bullying I see as defective behavior on the NT's part. You're just minding your own business right?
YEP! I am not asking for handouts, raising taxes, getting grants, etc... MANY are more involved in my business than I am in everyone elses business put together. But what is your point?
The point is, if you aren't harming other people, why should they harm you?
EXACTLY, but yours is a non-sequitor.
Fraya wrote:
Of course the main problem is that the doctor doesn't know for certain what to give or what dosage to use either.
Its a guessing game for them.. trial and error with the errors usually causing more trouble and risk.
Not exactly. The medications has already been proven to work for particular symptoms before they even put it on the prescription shelf for doctors to use. As for doses, its not a hit or miss sort of thing, it is based on previous data. What is unpredicable though, is how the patient might react. While there shouldn't be too much of a problem, every patient is different and so that is why they ask you about your past health and when taking any medication, report any problems so that they could be corrected beforehand. It works best when there is a cooperative effort on both the doctor's and the patient's part. This is also why they monitor your behavior and health signs from time to time.
Quote:
I think the point here is that the doctors are prescribing drugs to children to make the children lower maintenance for the parents benefit rather than the child's at the cost of the child's development and/or health.
Well, yes that is a major problem that is going on, especially revolving around ADD/ADHD. But that doesn't mean that the medication itself is bad or wrong, just that those people aren't using it properly and as such can become toxic.
_________________
Philosophy: A good way to demonstrate our ability to make stuff up.
Religion: A good way to demonstrate our ability to believe things that just aren't so.
Fraya wrote:
LostInSpace wrote:
Geez, then why not consider gender a race? That's genetically determined too!
Because that particular difference in genetics is already defined as "gender" of course.
And do you not see the parallel to this situation? Autism is currently defined as a disorder. I mean, deaf people with genetic deafness are not considered their own race. People with Downs Syndrome are not considered to belong to their own race. Why is autism special?
Quote:
People with Downs Syndrome are not considered to belong to their own race. Why is autism special?
Because Downs Syndrome and genetic deafness doesn't have as many benefits as penalties. Autism (particularly high functioning) could be considered a neutral trait as much a disease as skin color.
Quote:
Autism is currently defined as a disorder.
That doesn't mean it was defined correctly.
_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane
Orwell wrote:
RadiantAspie wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Check the opinions of Tony Attwood or Simon Baron-Cohen. Their opinions easily trump those of the Neo-Freudian quacks who dominate the psychiatric profession.
This is based on a few misconceptions:
First, Freud's theories is not accepted by any psychiatric or psychological practice.
Second, Tony Attwood does not support your position at all. Just read his books more carefully, since they are about how to deal and allieviate some of the symptoms.
Third, Simon-Baron Cohen proposes that Aspergers Syndrome, not the necessarily the whole ASD spectrum, is an extreme of the male brain. But this does not mean that it is necessarily a good thing, or a normal thing.
You are wrong.
Tony Attwood wrote:
From my clinical experience I consider that children and adults with Aspergers Syndrome have a different, not defective, way of thinking.
The person usually has a strong desire to seek knowledge, truth and perfection with a different set of priorities than would be expected with other people. There is also a different perception of situations and sensory experiences. The overriding priority may be to solve a problem rather than satisfy the social or emotional needs of others.
The person values being creative rather than co-operative.
The person with Aspergers syndrome may perceive errors that are not apparent to others, giving considerable attention to detail, rather than noticing the “big picture”.
The person is usually renowned for being direct, speaking their mind and being honest and determined and having a strong sense of social justice.
The person may actively seek and enjoy solitude, be a loyal friend and have a distinct sense of humour.
However, the person with Aspergers Syndrome can have difficulty with the management and expression of emotions.
Children and adults with Aspergers syndrome may have levels of anxiety, sadness or anger that indicate a secondary mood disorder. There may also be problems expressing the degree of love and affection expected by others. Fortunately, we now have successful psychological treatment programs to help manage and express emotions.
Tony Attwood
The person usually has a strong desire to seek knowledge, truth and perfection with a different set of priorities than would be expected with other people. There is also a different perception of situations and sensory experiences. The overriding priority may be to solve a problem rather than satisfy the social or emotional needs of others.
The person values being creative rather than co-operative.
The person with Aspergers syndrome may perceive errors that are not apparent to others, giving considerable attention to detail, rather than noticing the “big picture”.
The person is usually renowned for being direct, speaking their mind and being honest and determined and having a strong sense of social justice.
The person may actively seek and enjoy solitude, be a loyal friend and have a distinct sense of humour.
However, the person with Aspergers Syndrome can have difficulty with the management and expression of emotions.
Children and adults with Aspergers syndrome may have levels of anxiety, sadness or anger that indicate a secondary mood disorder. There may also be problems expressing the degree of love and affection expected by others. Fortunately, we now have successful psychological treatment programs to help manage and express emotions.
Tony Attwood
Looks like Attwood does support my position. We have our own special strengths, we are not defective, but we may have some difficulty in social interaction.
Well, first of all, he is stating an opinion.
And second, I was in no way arguing about way of thinking. What he is saying, if you understand correctly, is that people with Asperger's Syndrome and other forms of Autism exhibit a full range of personalities and specific strengths, just like any other person whether they have autism or not. The same holds for people with Bipolar, Schizophrenia, etc. With proper treatment, the bad symptoms go away or are alleviated, and they can go off to live a good life like any other normal person. It does not support your position at all.
Quote:
Autism Research Center at Cambridge University (Baron-Cohen) wrote:
Are AS (Asperger Syndrome) or HFA (High Functioning Autism) disabilities?
Both can be thought of as a personality style in which the individual does not ‘tune in’ naturally to people and is more attracted by objects, systems, and how things work
Both involve strengths in attention to detail, and can be associated with talent in areas such as mathematics, science, fact-collecting or rule-based subjects
Both are disabilities only in environments where the individual is expected to be both sociable and a good communicator
Both can be thought of as a personality style in which the individual does not ‘tune in’ naturally to people and is more attracted by objects, systems, and how things work
Both involve strengths in attention to detail, and can be associated with talent in areas such as mathematics, science, fact-collecting or rule-based subjects
Both are disabilities only in environments where the individual is expected to be both sociable and a good communicator
Baron-Cohen also seems to support my position. Asperger's/Autism are only disadvantages in certain specific contexts, but as NTs dominate the world through sheer force of numbers, they can ensure that they are always (or almost always) in the types of situations which they prefer (emphasis on social skills, less need for attention to detail etc). Us Aspies do not have the same luxury.
And your also wrong here. The problem with this is that you are cherry picking quotes. Their personality is obviously going to be determined by their physical brain structure. Second, this also holds true for many other people not on the ASD. And third, name an environment or situation that doesn't involve use of social skills. You will see that there are significant problems. To make it, you have to be able to socialize. It does not support your position either.
I don't know why you are so intent on labels or polarization, or segregation. Your logic is exactly the same as those who supported Nazism and other forms of social darwinism.
_________________
Philosophy: A good way to demonstrate our ability to make stuff up.
Religion: A good way to demonstrate our ability to believe things that just aren't so.
Fraya wrote:
Quote:
People with Downs Syndrome are not considered to belong to their own race. Why is autism special?
Because Downs Syndrome and genetic deafness doesn't have as many benefits as penalties. Autism (particularly high functioning) could be considered a neutral trait as much a disease as skin color.
Well then, I guess that you aren't aware that most who haven't undergone any treatment did not make it in life and have high rates of suicide and depression.
The only thing I am seeing here is outright denial of their problems.
And you are wrong about genetic deafness; it strenghtens the other senses. Rather, I can argue those who are deaf are better off then those who have autism.
_________________
Philosophy: A good way to demonstrate our ability to make stuff up.
Religion: A good way to demonstrate our ability to believe things that just aren't so.
Quote:
With proper treatment, the bad symptoms go away or are alleviated, and they can go off to live a good life like any other normal person.
The same could be said about neurotypicality. It depends on your definition of normal and good life.
In any case diseases, disorders, and syndromes by definition are never a good thing. Positive effects are never labeled as such. So if a disorder has positive effects its not considered a defect.
Quote:
The problem with this is that you are cherry picking quotes. Their personality is obviously going to be determined by their physical brain structure. Second, this also holds true for many other people not on the ASD. And third, name an environment or situation that doesn't involve use of social skills. You will see that there are significant problems. To make it, you have to be able to socialize. It does not support your position either.
1. Yeah so?
2. Yes but its not a trait of a genetic anomaly.
3. Why? As hes already stated the world was designed by people with specific skills for the use of those skills in daily life. Its debilitating for people who have skills other than those everyone is assumed to have but thats a sociological problem not an inherent flaw in the individual.
Quote:
I guess that you aren't aware that most who haven't undergone any treatment did not make it in life and have high rates of suicide and depression.
Again your arguing that trying to interact with an environment they weren't designed for is a flaw in the individual that must be treated. I cant breath underwater so I'm defective? I am if you ask the fish.
_________________
One pill makes you larger
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
-----------
"White Rabbit" - Jefferson Airplane
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Why do you think nts project their emotions onto autistics? |
07 Feb 2025, 1:19 pm |
Autistics are less employable than addicts (imo) |
24 Jan 2025, 7:26 pm |
What makes autistics happy and living good lives? |
14 Dec 2024, 5:50 am |