Aspergers and above average IQ
Katie_WPG
Velociraptor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40a52/40a5250dc4163a35cb216f017ca32e665aed619f" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 7 Sep 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 492
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Exactly. MR occurring without other known conditions such as autism is common. If MR generally occurred with autism-specific social impairments, a very large percentage with MR would likely meet some PDD diagnosis, which is not the case.
Another source of confusion arises from the terms low-functioning autism, high-functioning autism, and Asperger's. The validity of AS as a separate condition from autism has yet to be established, and it seems some people are assuming the social deficits in autism are related to MR and are qualitatively different to those in AS (and those classed as HFA seem to have been overlooked in this). They may have different expressions, but they are based upon the same criteria. The expression of the social impairment in relatively high-functioning autistics can also be mitigated by intellect and language, but it is still autism-specific social impairment.
The division of the spectrum between HFA and LFA categories also has questionable validity due to the difficulties measuring IQ in autistics, the highly scattered profiles of individuals, and changes in IQ throughout individual development, which relates to what KingdomOfRats said. As a result, the percentage of autistics with MR varies widely between studies.
For clarification, I know full well that I was refering only to Asperger's with my original post.
There are certainly people with both ASDs and MR, but they are typically diagnosed with Moderate to Low-functioning Classical autism, or MF/LF-PDD-NOS, not Asperger's.
However, it IS entirely possible for someone to lack social skills due to mental retardation that has nothing to do with ASDs. Not in the same way that people with Asperger's or High-functioning Kanner's lack social skills. But they still behave in socially inappropriate ways, nonetheless. My original post was refering to people who lack social skills that are not autism-specific.
An example of this would be something like, if a person with general MR, Down's Syndrome, or FAS started masturbating in public. Or hugging strangers. Or wiping their snot on people. Of course, many of the socially inappropriate behaviours are on the more extreme side than the behaviours of someone with a high-functioning ASD.
proof is easy, if you can understand math and the criteria for aspergers syndrome... the latter differs from autism primarily in the fact that there is no general delay or retardation in language or in cognitive development (says ICD-10)... meaning at least an average IQ or higher.
average IQ ranges from 85 to 115 ... and occurs in approx. 70% of the population.
below average IQ occurs in approx 15% of the population, just like above average IQ does.
so if one eliminates the below average scores - due to the asperger criteria - the average IQ will go up.
simplified example of this:
assigning a score related to the IQ
below 85 ....... 1
85 to 100 ....... 2
101 to 115 ....... 3
above 116 ....... 4
average score: 2.5
now assigning a score related to the IQ for aspergers (and thus excluding the <85 group according to the ICD-10)
85 to 100 ....... 2
101 to 115 ....... 3
above 116 ....... 4
average score: 3
there's the proof.
but... it doesn't mean that all aspies have an above average IQ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ff2/57ff265f4e08602e0af8a325e43a50c473daa53b" alt="Wink ;-)"
An example of this would be something like, if a person with general MR, Down's Syndrome, or FAS started masturbating in public. Or hugging strangers. Or wiping their snot on people. Of course, many of the socially inappropriate behaviours are on the more extreme side than the behaviours of someone with a high-functioning ASD.
Thanks for the clarification. I assumed this was what you were referring to in the original post from the wording; however, I wasn't 100% sure.
Verbal IQ 145; Performance IQ, 98; Full Scale IQ, 120---the schools gave me the test twice when I was nine, with comment "the gap between intellect and ability must cause considerable daily frustration." And how! The gap between verabal and performance seem to be an indicator of AS or NVLD or somehting that ain't NT. Even if the full scale IQ is high or very high, the brain doctors see this as a red flag.
Large gaps between (high) verbal IQ and (average) performance IQ are normal among Ashkenazi Jews; you see the exact opposite pattern in East Asia. Unbalance between IQ types is probably more common than generally thought, making the kind of blanket this-group-has-higher-intelligence statements mostly meaningless.
For people with AS, there seems to be spikes among certain types of intelligence (Verbal or Performance or Visual) and deficits in other. So instead of being smarter or dumber than NTs, AS might have the same overall intelligence but less even; higher-than-average ability in some area, but handicapped in other areas.
That's funny. Sounds like a parody someone could have written about me.
In my view there exist two major factors contributing to people with AS being in common opinion characterized by above average IQ:
- Someone who is mostly sitting home reading and talking to parents for the lack of friends in their age group will always sound much smarter than others.
-The other one is purely psychological, basing on existing in human heads some natural tendency towards balance: someone exhibiting noticeable deficits in some field (in this case in the field of social contacts) is automatically assumed by others that they’d be able to make up for it in another field (here the field of intelligence).
It's the obsession that makes the impression, really. The "little professor" grows up to be the "big professor".
For example, I know more about ASDs than my psychiatrist, and he freely admits such; I also correct him with medical terminology repetitively (I'm such a courteous fellow). He has a PhD in medicine, plus the psychology degree; I have a grade 10 pass. His IQ would be much higher than mine overall, realistically. Whilst this is a fallacy to say that one needs education to be smart in the ways defined, it's more likely that the one who has the education will be smarter in the ways defined.
RE: MR and social ability. Someone with just moderate to mild MR will have better social ability than the individual with AS who has an IQ of 100. The only time it's sometimes hard to distinguish between the two is when you get to a profound level of MR in normal people and those with Profound Autism. Both groups are severely impaired (even though in the person with Autism, it's more likely that their brains are too "smart" rather than too "dumb", and they can't handle anything but the basic of repetitive actions, as the world is too overwhelming).
Ichinin
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e436/1e436773bd75e514410618e6add566e5d8829f9f" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 3 Apr 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,653
Location: A cold place with lots of blondes.
Look at the mensa IQ test. Those moving patterns are very visual/spatial. Some Aspies (like me) have unusually high spatial abilities, like at least twice as good as normal people.
Now, if the ability to extrapolate moving patterns from a sequence of previous images indicates some sort of intelligence, then sure i am intelligent.
Note: It does not mean that i am some sort of "math genius" like some people seem to think all aspies are - i have a modest interest in math because of my interest in cryptography, but otherwise i plainly suck at math. I am very good with computers since they are logical and make sense and i have been programming in several programming languages since childhood, but math in general... *yawn*
A positive stereotype is still a stereotype...
_________________
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring" (Carl Sagan)
Master_Shake
Toucan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6e7d/d6e7d38aa9f24e3ae0745480d809f5be6046e6fd" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 262
Location: Michigan, United States
assigning a score related to the IQ
below 85 ....... 1
85 to 100 ....... 2
101 to 115 ....... 3
above 116 ....... 4
average score: 2.5
now assigning a score related to the IQ for aspergers (and thus excluding the <85 group according to the ICD-10)
85 to 100 ....... 2
101 to 115 ....... 3
above 116 ....... 4
average score: 3
there's the proof.
Great example aspi-rant. Theoretically speaking, if the lower 15% of a population was exluded, the average IQ for Aspies would be the 57.5 percentile, about 103(assuming Asperger's does not affect IQ negatively or positively). This is in accordance with a study I've seen where Aspies in the study group had an average IQ of 104. If the lower 2.3% (IQ < 70) were excluded, the average IQ for Aspies would be the 51.15 percentile, about 101.
I would like to point out that there is no standard definition of "average IQ." Some say 95 to 105, some say 90 to 110, some say 70 to 130. In IQ testing < 70 is MR, 70 to 79 is "borderline", 80 to 89 is "low average", 90 to 109 is "average", 110 to 119 is "high average", 120 to 129 is "superior", and => 130 is "gifted." So average can be about 90 to 110 or 85 to 115 or 70 to 130 depending on context.
When psychologist says Aspies "have IQs in the average to above average range" it should probably be taken to mean IQ > 70. Though there is no standard. As some people have said those with mild MR can be diagnosed as Asperger's, but in reality very few (in relation to prevalence in normal IQ population) are.
_________________
I'm supposed to say something clever here.
not entirely true... at least not when WAIS tests are involved:
The WAIS-IV was standardized on a sample of 2,200 people in the United States ranging in age from 16 to 90. An extension of the standardization has been conducted with 688 Canadians in the same age range. The median Full Scale IQ is centered at 100, with a standard deviation of 15. In a normal distribution, the IQ range of one standard deviation above and below the mean (i.e, between 85 and 115) is where approximately 68% of all adults would fall.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wechsler_A ... ence_Scale
not entirely true... at least not when WAIS tests are involved:
The WAIS-IV was standardized on a sample of 2,200 people in the United States ranging in age from 16 to 90. An extension of the standardization has been conducted with 688 Canadians in the same age range. The median Full Scale IQ is centered at 100, with a standard deviation of 15. In a normal distribution, the IQ range of one standard deviation above and below the mean (i.e, between 85 and 115) is where approximately 68% of all adults would fall.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wechsler_A ... ence_Scale
And where you see a standard definition of "average IQ" in that?
I think aspie-rant put it best, its largely to do with the maths.
Of course IQ's are highly questionable as a way to assess intelligence, they are nortoriously terrible at even passing over to different cultures and subgroups within the same culture. I would question their reletiveness on a person with aspergers syndrome as I doubt people with that neurotype were used enough or in the right ways when designing the IQ system.
I rarely meet nt's who care about IQ. It doesn't seem to affect the lives of a large part of the population. I'd expect a higher average in a group who find a test that gives them a number. A number that signifies a false achievement when the world presents so many pitfalls.
Why is there so much debate over who is in or out of the Aspie gang? There are a number of different ATTEMPTS at criteria. Non of which are set in stone. All have current grey areas and all room for future adjustment as study and debate continues. So surely the whole black/white is/isn't is totally missing the point?
So if a subsection of Aspie like people contain a large number of Aspie traits, more maybe than a subsection of other Aspie diagnosed people, but because they don't have all the currently CHOSEN significant traits as listed in ONE specific criteria, at ONE specific point in time. Are you saying they are somehow less Aspie?
Lets all treat the use of the English language like it has a clear well defined syntax and that we have Aspie rules that have been set in stone for millennia wooo!! !!
As someone pointed out, comparing Aspie and NT intelligence is like apples and oranges. There are different kinds of intelligence. Consider the following:
1. In-depth thinking and analytical ability
2. Savant computation
3. Organizational, prioritization and management skills
4. Communication, linguistic and PR skills
5. Planning skills
6. Ability to keep things in perspective
7. Ability to learn from one's mistakes
8. Ability to live within one's means
9. Family cohesion skills and the ability to have one partner for life
10. Ability to be consistent
11. Insight, intuition, non-linear thinking, wisdom and spiritual enlightenment
12. Architectural, design, and artistic ability
13. Ability to compose symphonies and savant musical skills
14. Mechanical and construction skills
15. Leadership skills including ability to inspire and unite
16. Ordinary and savant healing/diagnostic skills
17. Litigation skills of argument, debate and persuasion
Any more?
I just took something like an IQ test that is given to anyone in the State of Florida that wants it. It's called the "Work Keys" Test, and you can give the
results to potential employers, government and civilian. I would recommend to everyone who is job hunting to go to their state unemployment office
to take it. I think most states have something similar.
There are Levels 1-7 on Reading, Math and Locating Information - which is reading graphs, charts, stock reports, etc. I scored Level 7 on Reading and
Level 5 on Math and Locating Info. This makes me "Gold Certified" (ie, scoring 5 or above on all three tests). I'll use any advantage I can get in doing
well in interviews. What I lack in social skills, I make up in proving intelligence. This is an Aspie adaptive technique I guess you can say.
I always scored higher on verbal exams than on math. I did a little studing to pass the math test.. havn't done that in a while!
And let's keep in mind while discussing IQs that I don't believe it is something you are born with. Nor is IQ static. You can raise your IQ by hard work
and having educational materials and inspiration available to you. It's the same with dancing, music, arts, or whatever interests you.