natty wrote:
I know it wasn't my fault exactly, as i wasn't involved in the disagreement , i hadn't posted on that subject at all , but maybe im as guilty, by omission , I didnt think the person was struggling with what was said because she continued posting and seemed ok to counter the other peoples arguments , but it was obvious to me on her first post that she was angry or upset about something , and as the post and the disagreement was over something so trivial , I guessed something more was at the route of her being upset , but obviously i didnt think on it enough to step in and tell people to quit so the person faught the argument without any back up , when she shouldnt have had to fight at all. she was an aspie , and i do think it was a relvant fact , because she had a habit of saying what she thought and could be quite blunt about it , so she appeared generally to be aggresive although i dont for one minute think she was . The whole argument started off because she posted * why is this post here it is not relveant to the subject ? * Its a straight forward question , probably much like the questions I would ask , although I long since learned that speaking your mind about issues like this do end up getting me introuble because the world doesnt work in the aspie way of things being in the right place always , being logical or following logical rules or procedure. I should have pointed this out to them all and i didnt . i am guilty by omission.
People can seem just as together in real life and still have those feelings. it is possible that there was a lot going on in here life and this was just one thing that added to it?
You are not guilty of anything because over such a small thing very few people(if any) would have seen this as the result.
_________________
snowcone