activebutodd wrote:
AmberEyes wrote:
Some people I've known have gazes like this:
I can think of several instances in popular culture and cartoon shows where this type of gaze is portrayed, usually by a "techie" stereotype character. This "gaze" is often comically portrayed as a kind of "social obliviousness".
Perhaps that's what it looks like from the outside even if it's completely inadvertent?

They're just jealous cos we're smart. If NT people don't like my beady eyes, they don't have to look at me!

I'm not sure.
People were reacting to me negatively long before I ever became "smart".
I now believe that it's an inadvertent expression that's misinterpreted as a "threat".
Perhaps other people do feel threatened if they cannot read another person's facial expression (especially if the expression doesn't seem to match what is being said or is blank).
Perhaps other people don't give a blank "stare" the "benefit of the doubt" if they can't socially interpret it. I believe that an "unreadable" expression could be reacted to with either fear or awe: that's a fight or flight "gut reaction".
That often translates to the other person as "fight" or lampoon/bully.
Sadly, I now can see the survival value this reaction would have for the other person. I say this even though I've been on the receiving end of such gut reactions.
Human beings are social animals and are variably social. Perhaps some of the more sociable ones have trouble interpreting the less social ones facial expressions and vice versa. I also speculate that how you react to someone depends on your own socialising history and facial expressions. That would make sense, to me anyway.
I also noticed that many so called "disorders" (hate this word) have a "lack of facial affect" mentioned as a common component. It does look like people want to categorise and effectively shun people with "blank" looking facial expressions. Perhaps, this is a societal version of the "gut reaction" or "fear"?