Why do NTs turn nasty ...
I must depart now. My boyfriend's nearly here. I bid you adieu and good luck XD
All I see outside my house are people and all I know is I don't connect well with most, if not all of them. Thanks, anyway.
Prejudice, in many forms, comes from the Uncanny Valley.
Now, there are reasons for the Uncanny Valley, but this is why autism is so feared.
_________________
"Let reason be your only sovereign." ~Wizard's Sixth Rule
I'm working my way up to Attending Crazy Taoist. For now, just call me Dr. Crazy Taoist.
I don't think people realise (especially the complaining NTs here) why sites like this came into being. 10 years ago there were no support sites on the net for autistic adults. There were however, support sites for parents and families at which autistics were not welcome or barely tolerated.
The increasing presence of NTs here and their demands to be included are of a concern to me because having had experience in mixed NT/AS groups (and IRL where it's the same), I feel that NTs are both likely and capable of taking over and dominating groups of autistics. They very often seek out positions of power too as that gives them control. In the case of parents/partners seeking to use this group for their support, I wonder where their AS partners and kids can go - if you're not happy for your partner/child to use this site as well, then that rather puts them out in the cold, doesn't it?
I wonder if this site will end up being an NT support site and a lot of autistics will drift away.
You have to remember that NTs are not shy about asking for help and even demanding it as a 'right'. Autistics don't have that ability. That's why you have to privelege AS people at a (supposed) AS support site.
Last edited by Postperson on 23 Jul 2009, 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Firstly, venting and discrimination are not synonymous. Neither is venting and bashing and hate speech. Don't take my word for it; here are some unbiased definitions:
VENTING: to give expression to strong feelings or opinions
DISCRIMINATION: unfair treatment of a person or group on the basis of prejudice
BASHING: To criticize (another) harshly, accusatorially, and threateningly
HATE-SPEECH: Bigoted speech attacking or disparaging a social or ethnic group or a member of such a group.
I wasn't trying to say venting and discrimination were the same thing. I was saying the exact opposite. The post you quoted wasn't discrimination, it was venting. Discrimination would be if you were banned from this forum simply for being NT.
"All you aspies are a real pain in our collective NT butts. You're all stupid and you make me want to throw up! Why can't aspies just stop acting weird and get with the damn program? It's not like it's hard or something. But I suppose we're just stuck with all of you. It really sucks though."
(btw, writing that DID NOT FEEL GOOD! I'm shaking right now and I certainly feel worse for having done so)
THAT is NOT venting!! !! !! That is horrible, irresponsible HATE SPEECH!! ! HOW CAN ANYONE HEAL IF THAT'S ALLOWED TO GO ON UNCHECKED?! And is it really a service WP is providing for its terribly hurt aspie members to not give them NEW AND IMPROVED ways of expressing themselves that speak to the harm done and not just the ongoing suffering? Then people could change sentences like:
"Neurotypical people are predominantly not worth knowing." [Aspiewordsmith]
to...
"I can see now, when I look into my past, that the neurotypical people who hurt me back then were just not worth knowing. Therefore, no great loss that I didn't fit in with those losers."
The first sentence just dumps the author's pain into every sensitive person's lap who reads it with nowhere to go with it but either to take it in and personalize it, or attempt like crazy to "just let it go". But, I have news for you: it hurts even if we don't respond!! !! And telling us to just click off and go find some other thread WHERE WE ARE NOT BEING OPENLY TREATED LIKE DIRT just minimizes and trivializes OUR PAIN! In other words, aspies need to be safe here at the expense of NTs being unsafe (????) HOW IS THAT OK? AND HOW DOES THAT MAKE THINGS BETTER?? HOW DOES REVENGE ON THOSE WHO NEVER HURT YOU MITIGATE YOUR PAIN??
Ban me, I don't care. Someone has to stand up and tell the truth about the abominable practices here. It's atrocious and outrageous and DON'T ONE OF YOU DARE TRY TO SAY, "Oh, typical over-reacting NT!" because it's not fair to greet other people's pain with judgment and disdain.
I think that's just about all the energy I have to give this place the way it's set-up now. I'll lurk and if it stays this bad, I'll just move on. I'm sure a bunch of you are getting your jollies seeing me in so much pain over your ugliness. Well, you're just as nasty as the bullies who first harmed you and I'm not going to stand for it one more second.
I hope everyone on WP gets exactly what they need,
Feyhera
Okay. Your aspie husband is problematic for you. I'm sorry for that. I probably shouldn't say anything since I don't really know your situation. Just know I'm not judging you in my mind for being "NT" or dismissing your pain.
BTW, I don't consider myself harmed by bullies. I just feel like standing up for the underdog. I don't like how society downplays the damage caused by bullying. Especially psychological bullying targeted against specific individuals for being "different". It's NOT just "something everyone goes through" and the problem isn't just "a few bad apples". It's a systemic societal problem. If you've never been a major target you aren't aware of it. A lot of aspies here do harbor hatred and a lot of it has to do with psychological damage caused by unfair rejection and bullying.
Incorrect, the world is run by society, which has certain things in place to measure an individuals worth. NT's and aspies alike can fail at all the different hurdles.
Being autistic does not make one an "underdog", and being NT does not preclude someone from being an "underdog".
Which has nothing to do with NT's, but a society that is harsh towards everyone. When NT's fail and blame racial groups, groups of a specific orientation, and groups of a specific sex for their problems we jump on them quite rightly. Yet when our own attack groups of people, we all stick up for them and state how they are justified. They are never justified and we should teach them to displace their anger onto better targets, instead of encouraging them.
Being autistic does not make one an "underdog", and being NT does not preclude someone from being an "underdog".
I never contradicted that. I stand up for all underdogs, not just autistic people. It's just that this site is for autistic people.
Which has nothing to do with NT's, but a society that is harsh towards everyone.
Aspies are targeted a fair bit more than NT's. Anyone that's different and somehow perceived as weak is targeted.
And you're stereotyping as well now. Who says people who are bullied and shunned "fail"? Do you assume that whenever people complain about "NT's" on here they're always attempting to place blame for their own failings? Are you sure some don't just resent the way they were mistreated in the past simply for being different?
I'm not claiming all aspies are innocent either. I know I'm not. I can be a jerk sometimes. I don't bully but I can be very impatient and irritable.
Actually i'm clearly describing a specific type of person in that paragraph, take particular note at the use of the word "and"
If you antagonise someone, then it is a "fail". Aspies recieve more abuse than the average population because they antagonise people. We should be focusing on teaching people to avoid this, rather than teach them the rest of the word is evil. The very title of this topic resigns it to being a junk-topic.
Why on earth would i do that?
And this question assumes a specific answer from the previous question.
If you antagonise someone, then it is a "fail".
Are you claiming that bullying is always the result of the victim antagonizing the bully? Personally I've never witnessed this. What I've always witnessed is bullies antagonizing people for the hell of it. In fact, they usually pick those with the least aggressive personalities, those who are too nice for their own good.
Either speak for yourself or prove it. I've met quite a few aspies and the vast majority aren't antagonistic. Some are a little bit annoying and tend to rattle on too long when speaking, others are simply awkward. I don't see how these traits are antagonizing or grounds for abuse.
Notice the use of the word "IF" in my statement.
Intentionally antagonistic? not many. Unintentionally? Most. Plus, you completely missed the word "IF" again.
Notice the use of the word "IF" in my statement.
Intentionally antagonistic? not many. Unintentionally? Most. Plus, you completely missed the word "IF" again.
No, I didn't miss the "if". I gathered that you were assuming the stated condition "you antagonize someone" is true in the vast majority of cases where abuse occurs. I don't agree with that assessment.
A summary of my response to the general nature of all the recent posts...
Men (meaning men,women, AS, NT) all have a natural instinct to be predators. Most predators tend to choose prey who are weak or injured...like wolves will go after a kid, old person, someone with a broken leg, anyone bleeding, etc. before going after a healthy adult. People have a social order, so many of our predative instincts also occur in the social realm. Bullies target people they perceive to be weaker than them. They will be physically abusive to someone who is physically weaker, and they will be verbally abusive to someone who is socially weaker. That's why Aspies are a big target because by definition, we are socially weaker. I give props to all who are able to overcome their bullies (aspie or not).
I don't appreciate NT's coming on here and acting like they know what Aspies go through with bullying because they were bullied too at some point. Everyone has different experiences, so don't think because you naturally feel some empathy that it's accurate. We may call it bullying, but it's really more like a discrimination. Also, it's not the Aspies that make it about NT's vs Aspies...no the NT's make it about that when they make fun of autistic people and call us ret*d.
I hope WP doesn't stop the "hate speeches" against NTs. This is one of the very few havens for AS to turn to, and they need an outlet for their anger. Much better to type some hateful things here than to let it build and turn into a meltdown. It may not be the healthiest way to express oneself, but it sure beats some of the other options. I personally don't really try to fall under it, and I always try to remind people when all people are like that not just NTs, so I don't believe in enabling it (or encouraging it), but I don't believe banning it is any better because it doesn't confront the issue but rather avoids it. All you NT's reading this... I promise you, telling an Aspie, "You are wrong and hateful for doing that" isn't going to get you far, but telling them, "I feel you but it's not NTs that are that way, but all people are capable of it, and not all are that way, and you can do something about it like...." will go somewhere and turn a useless rant into a useful conversation. I guess in the NT world, it's enough to merely state a problem and consider it solved, but Aspies prefer to hear solutions to their problems. As insulting as it may be for you to hear "NT's suck," it's more insulting to the Aspie for you to state the obvious, "That's discrimination." No duh. We know that. We just have a problem that's so big that we don't care. You know, our temper gets really bad to where we can't always control it? Many Aspies at some point feel that way, and I even have a lot growing up, except I geared my hatred toward society and people in general, which didn't do me any good. I would have loved going to a forum and ranting about it to have someone say, "I know what you are going through...tell me about it." Just that would have been enough to get me to move on instead of dwelling on the injustice.
You do see a lot of athiest Aspies, and fortunately I'm not one of them.
That was very insensitive. I am, by one definition, an atheist (it has been variously defined as someone who doesn't believe in the existence of any gods and someone who believes there aren't any gods, I fit only the former definition) but I am a very moral person. There is nothing "unfortunate" about being an atheist.
A couple thoughts - I don't think hate speech should be condoned or protected here. The Haven provides a respite for those who need to vent their anger and frustrations. The comment about bullying works in reverse - it isn't fair to say that those not on the spectrum don't have any base of understanding, either. Our negative experiences should not preclude us from having positive ones.
This is really good personal sharing, and I think helpful for others. Thank you.
M.
_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.
For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
You do see a lot of athiest Aspies, and fortunately I'm not one of them.
That was very insensitive. I am, by one definition, an atheist (it has been variously defined as someone who doesn't believe in the existence of any gods and someone who believes there aren't any gods, I fit only the former definition) but I am a very moral person. There is nothing "unfortunate" about being an atheist.
Shoot. I totally didn't mean it that way. I will totally agree that many athiests have morals. Many are more moral than many Christians I've met. So, I wasn't trying to say that at all. I only meant that with me, I wouldn't be moral if I were athiest. You don't understand the urges I have to just take the money and run, or beat the living crap out of someone. The law surely doesn't stop me, but God does. It's really hard to explain, but because of God, I understand why morality is important. I guess I look at it like an ongoing war between good and evil, and I chose my side. But I know I wouldn't be that way if it weren't for God.
Edited to add: When I say Fortunately, I mean its fortunate to society that I am not one of them, not fortunate for me.
Last edited by Tantybi on 23 Jul 2009, 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Some simple semantic changes would go along way. Rail at society, instead of NT's. Use terms that don't generalize so much; instead, refer to "most NT's I've encountered," and so on.
While I understand the history behind this site, there is also an evolution underway across society. You can allow this site to become part of the education process, and part of that evolution, or you can entrench in your anger and miss the opportunity. It is the choice of the various members what path they desire, and the job of the moderators to make sure that parth is consistent with the terms of service.
Personally, I think much is lost when you alienate all the NT's who have a desire to come here. Those that do don't come because they want to take over, or to educate you, or anything like that. We come here because we have a vested in interest in understanding life from an AS perspective, and in figuring out how to help someone we care about navigate that life. It's my job as a parent to do the best by my AS son that I can, and I learn things here that I cannot learn in pure parenting groups where practices aren't based on an AS vision, but on an NT one. Don't you WANT me to use an AS vision with my AS child? Send us away, and that cannot happen.
To date, that I am aware of, moderators have NOT made a practice of censoring - as in removing, deleting, or pm'ing official warnings - anti NT discussion. They HAVE, however, started to try to gently control it. This comes from their own discomfort with it. And they are AS. I am the only moderator that isn't fully AS and I play a very minor role here, focusing my modding on parenting and kids forums, and only jumping in elsewhere generally as a member. It isn't me that is uncomfortable; it is other AS. And their feelings matter. When you speak with hate you make others who are just like you feel uncomfortable. Face it, hate is never comfortable.
The whole point to venting negative feelings and expressing frustration is to move beyond it. Which means, no one should need to spend 5 years repeating the same feelings about NT's. At some point, the venting should move into another phase, one that becomes productive. And we have productive threads here, many of them, on reconciling differences and getting along.
I really don't think we're going to squash all the negative talk tomorrow. I haven't seen anyone suggest that. All I've seen is a few people post along the lines of, "whoah, aren't you being a little harsh? Isn't that potentially running against the terms of service?" They're just asking people to think a little before posting, and to try to see that maybe there are perspectives the angry poster is missing. If someone is going to work through their negative feelings, being confronted in this way is an important part of it. Or do you not want to work through those feelings? Is the hate a badge of honor? I would hope not. That is a horrible way to live.
WP is in no danger of becoming an NT haven. It is well known that this place is anti-NT. But every so often you get someone willing to brave all that in the search of true understanding. I consider that a good thing for the AS community, in the long run.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
I think it would help this forum to have a specific forum for ranting where people who don't want to read it can avoid it. Like a smoking section...hahahaha....that would be a good name for it. To be honest, I can see someone seeking a haven not wanting to read that either. Again, banning it is avoiding the issues and forcing Aspies to avoid their issues for purposes of here. Not too productive.
No I don't mean that NT's wouldn't have input on bullies. I think their experiences can be very helpful if they so choose to use those experiences in a productive manner. But, when they come on here saying, "I've been bullied too, so there's no excuse for you to say what you said..." cmon now. That's like a white person saying, "well I totally understand where black people are coming from because I too have experienced racism, and this is how you are supposed to react to racism based on my experiences..." I had a similar discussion about mothers recently on here. I'm sorry, but unless you are a parent, you just won't know all the variables involved in parenting. I hear a lot of opinions on people who don't have kids about the way I should parent, and it's not fair to me for them to condemn me as a parent, especially when they wouldn't fully understand what I'm up against. The same is said here. NT's don't fully understand all the variables of being autistic, so it's not fair to autistic people to be condemned for something by someone who doesn't understand what the autistic individual is truly up against. If you don't like what someone says, you can productively debate it without judging them.