Goodbye

Post Reply New Topic

Link please?

I read the post. Basically she was complaining that he editted his own posts and thats why it looked like he was attacked, since people only read what others said to him, but not what he said to cause it.

WHat she seems to miss however is that other people QUOTED him, so yes I read what he said to earn the "attacks" since I read people's quotes and yes, it did sound provoking. I guess the reason I still say that he was "attacked" is that the fact that other people's actions were CAUSED by something doesn't change the fact that they did these actions (i.e. an attack). Yes, the cause would JUSTIFY their actions, but even if their actions are justified still the fact is that they made them. So when I was saying he was attacked I didn't mean to imply that the attack was not justified or that it was out of the blue. I was simply relaying facts, thats it. Why? Well, since some people were confused why he was upset I wanted to update them on history. I weren't taking sides as I did that. I simply said "here is what other people told him, and thats why he was upset". Now that simple statement is still true, even if what others told him was caused by his own behavior.

So once again it has nothing to do with editting. Even though he editted all of his posts, others quoted him so I still read all the quotes before I responded.

I believe she is talking about this thread: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postp2868634 ... t=#2868634

Roman beat me to it.

Whatever you decide to do, we wish you the best of luck.

good. just keep on truckin.' within limits.

This is another thread about the thread in question, not the original thread.

And after reading all this and that guess what...in a bunch of days from now, who will care?

Move on, it's Troll hunting season...which is even better than rabbit or duck season