Page 5 of 7 [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

jamieboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,619

13 Jan 2011, 10:18 am

There could be potential benefits to him being an aspie. If the government see a group of people as potentially powerful or a threat they are more likely to consider the question of what to do with them in a serious way. That is preferable to the current line of either ignoring aspies or sh*****g all over them, in my mind.



2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

13 Jan 2011, 12:18 pm

There is a STUPID policy in the US that, if you have some sort of "mental defect", you don't have to go to jail or get executed. Since AS is SO hard to PROVE, and therefore disprove, it is an easy out for such an IDIOT! I think it is clear that he DIDN'T have AS.

Frankly, I THINK I know what he was trying to say. He said "only 5% of the people dream". MANY hear that and figure "WHAT was he trying to say!?!?". Taken in context, I think he SHOULD have said "only 5% of the people LUCID dream". As I recall, that stat IS about right. And HE used the term "conscious dreaming". I don't know how to fit that into what else he says. It is all disjointed. I can kind of see the idea about brain washing, but I might have referred to the herd mentality, or making people accustomed to, or losing hope. People DO repeat lies an awful lot, and do convince people. That IS brainwashing,

Of course, that doesn't fit with the communist and fascist leanings of Loughner. And I DO agree with the idea of being against illiteracy. Of course loughner didn't include enough detail in his sentences, and didn't group them right, to allow people to truly understand what he wanted to say. Maybe he thought THEY were illiterate.

And what does ANY of that have to do with Giffords? NOTHING! And killing a person like this only exacerbates the perceived problem. MANY that speak against this LOVE it. They FEED off it! They THRIVE on it! It will be used to help further their goals. They started even before the first report on it! Read carefully, and even the VERY first report probably HINTS at it. Heck, maybe Loughner WANTED this, since they tend to think as he does. And most of them are "NT"S!



Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 68,708
Location: Over there

13 Jan 2011, 4:20 pm

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
do not insult our collective intelligence with your bs anymore.
:roll: That's pretty rich, considering what preceded it from you, and I think it would have only been polite to let me know in advance that, apparently, you're the arbiter of "our collective intelligence".
At least then I would have known who I should have come to, cap in hand and seeking approval, before audaciously giving my opinion in an open forum.

Quote:
Why is it he targeted (..)
It's so obvious why he chose her.
Not only her, but he went on a shooting spree in a place where the people who voted for her and her staff would be.
He wanted to attack her, (...)
Why is that obvious fact (...)
It was cunning on his part (...)
I see.
Since you have so many facts on this, maybe you should offer your services to the Police?
I'm sure they'd find it all very useful. I mean, you clearly have all the details and likely Jared would be frying in no time at all - and wouldn't that be lovely?

Or is it all just speculation?
Why lordy me, I do believe it is.
Rather neatly, you've demonstrated exactly the pointlessness of speculation.

But what shocks and disappoints me so much is that here, of all places, people are piling into this guy and dissecting out "facts" about his mental state from, well, absolutely nothing whatever.
That's just sickening.


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


MotownDangerPants
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 955

13 Jan 2011, 4:36 pm

I thought he may have been, but if so, an Aspie that is developing schizophrenia.



DeaconBlues
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,661
Location: Earth, mostly

13 Jan 2011, 5:58 pm

In today's newspaper, more details concerning complaints against Loughner at the community college were released. Apparently, during an English class, he maintained that the Constitution, which he could see printed on the wall, guaranteed him "freedom of thought", which meant he could write down any thoughts he had and the teacher would have to accept it for a passing grade. He was ejected from a math class after arguing with the instructor about a number ("He said it was an 8, and I told him I call that number 16"). The teacher who felt sufficiently threatened to arrange a campus-security escort was Loughner's Yoga instructor; apparently, Loughner felt his grade of B in her Pilates class was undeserved, and demanded that it be changed forthwith to an A.

Based on this and other information released, I would suggest the most likely diagnosis for Jared Loughner would be paranoid schizophrenia. It's not autism, and it's not lupus.

Remember also, being crazy doesn't mean he's legally insane - legal insanity is a totally different construct. You can sincerely believe that you are the hereditary ruler of all mankind, and receive encrypted messages from cats; so long as you know the difference between what is "right" and "wrong" for you to do, legally you're still sane.


_________________
Sodium is a metal that reacts explosively when exposed to water. Chlorine is a gas that'll kill you dead in moments. Together they make my fries taste good.


2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

13 Jan 2011, 6:53 pm

Verdandi wrote:
I don't believe it's credible. I know of one woman (mother of a son with Asperger's) suggested he might have Asperger's based on the fact that Loughner talked about wanting to make a new currency and her son talked about wanting to make a new currency. So she leapt to the defense of people with AS everywhere and suggested that teens (at least teen boys) with AS need to be tightly controlled so they do not turn to or are not tricked into a life of violent crime.

Do Not Let Tuscon Gunman Define Asperger Syndrome (link). Instead, allow an alarmist mother who seems to think Asperger's = borderline sociopath with a side order of naivete to define Asperger's Syndrome.


WOW! WHY especially teen BOYS? I have known some evil females that wanted everything their way at all costs. And a LOT of NT kids turn to and/or are tricked into a life of crime. Frankly, Aspies really should be HARDER to trick due to tolerances, things avoided, being alone, and NOT GIVEN TO PEER PRESSURE.

And loughner considers himself to be LESS naive. He is obviously speaking AGAINST listening to others. He has used a LOT of hallucinogens, and obviously has NO touch with reality.



jamieboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,619

14 Jan 2011, 1:57 am

2ukenkerl wrote:
There is a STUPID policy in the US that, if you have some sort of "mental defect", you don't have to go to jail or get executed. Since AS is SO hard to PROVE, and therefore disprove, it is an easy out for such an IDIOT! I think it is clear that he DIDN'T have AS.

Frankly, I THINK I know what he was trying to say. He said "only 5% of the people dream". MANY hear that and figure "WHAT was he trying to say!?!?". Taken in context, I think he SHOULD have said "only 5% of the people LUCID dream". As I recall, that stat IS about right. And HE used the term "conscious dreaming". I don't know how to fit that into what else he says. It is all disjointed. I can kind of see the idea about brain washing, but I might have referred to the herd mentality, or making people accustomed to, or losing hope. People DO repeat lies an awful lot, and do convince people. That IS brainwashing,

Of course, that doesn't fit with the communist and fascist leanings of Loughner. And I DO agree with the idea of being against illiteracy. Of course loughner didn't include enough detail in his sentences, and didn't group them right, to allow people to truly understand what he wanted to say. Maybe he thought THEY were illiterate.

And what does ANY of that have to do with Giffords? NOTHING! And killing a person like this only exacerbates the perceived problem. MANY that speak against this LOVE it. They FEED off it! They THRIVE on it! It will be used to help further their goals. They started even before the first report on it! Read carefully, and even the VERY first report probably HINTS at it. Heck, maybe Loughner WANTED this, since they tend to think as he does. And most of them are "NT"S!


You wanna be careful with HOW you are DEFINING mental defect. That's all i'm saying.



Magneto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,086
Location: Blighty

14 Jan 2011, 5:34 am

He was either an Aspie or a Sociopath. I'm going with the latter.

I do wonder what the reaction would have been if it had been a Republican rep who had been killed... which was entirely possible, given that his motivation for killing her was that she was part of the evil, oppressive, mind-controlling government...



2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

14 Jan 2011, 6:42 am

Verdandi wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Verdandi, I am not so sure because CNN and Fox News are making it sound like a random act of violence by a person with a mental illness. If you look at the location it shows rational cunning on behalf of Loughner.


I agree with you, but I believe that the decision to present Loughner's crime in this way is a strategic, political decision on the part of some. The Republicans' and Tea Partiers' attempts to distance themselves are because they are aware of the connection and culpability. I believe Fox News will not present the story accurately and instead presents it in such a way as to make the right wing look blameless.

Plus the cultural narrative about mental illness = dangerous gives an easy way out of acknowledging what happened.


Lougner followed MARXISM, and was said to not be partisan, etc... Giffords was pretty CONSERVATIVE! The IDEA that loughner is republican and sane is ridiculous enough. That a republican, of ALL the real leftist people out there, would even try to hurt giffords as the first victim is lunacy.

BTW Republicans as a group don't do such things.

The guy was a total KOOK. Giffords voted for the health care bill, and the guy never mentioned that. Giffords, as a democrat, probably DID vote for more money for "education". If loughner wanted to prevent the illiteracy and brainwashing, a more likely target would have been the teacher's unions. Money for "education" often goes to the teachers or unions pay and benefits.

BTW he first visited giffords BEFORE the TEA PARTY existed.



2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

14 Jan 2011, 6:53 am

chewingkebabs wrote:
Amik wrote:
Zen wrote:
What annoys me is that every time some nutcase goes on a shooting spree, the media is all, "He was a loner, quiet, kept to himself, didn't have many friends..."

No wonder we have it rough.

That not only annoys me, but makes me mad. Every time somebody goes on a shooting spree the media is quick to list up characteristics that people tend to find a bit out of the ordinary. The media doesn't mention when shooters are extraverted, talkative, social, have lots of friends etc. In this case it even sounds like the description the media gave of the shooter was completely incorrect, but do you hear them correcting it?

People are enough already freaked out about quiet people, loners and people who struggle socially without the media stigmatizing those traits even more by labelling every damn murderer with them and emphasizing this in their coverage.

I also hate when they feel the need to mention whenever a criminal has some mental disorder or even speculate about it on the media when it's completely irrelevant to what the person did. In most cases those disorders have little or nothing to do with the crime committed, but when people constantly hear certain disorders mentioned in relation to murderers and other criminals, they jump to the conclusion that all people with that disorder are potentially dangerous or bad people that they need to stay away from. Aspies, schizophrenics etc. don't commit more crimes than other people, but a lot of people think that they do because the disorders are so often mentioned in the media while they never hear "the murderer had no disorder whatsoever".

I'm an aspie and I'm quiet, have few friends and am pretty much a loner who keeps to myself (I have no choice, because I don't know how to make new friends or keep them). I have on several occasions noticed that some people are scared of me, freaked out or uncomfortable with my quiet loner demeanor. I don't need stuff like this to make things even worse and cause even more ostracization. :(

Thank you! Exactly my feelings.

And from all the pictures and reports on him, he doesn't fit the profile of an Aspie at all.


THANKS!

Chewingkebabs,

I'm pretty much the same way, as you, also. HECK, that guy tutored a 15yo girl, and she became his girlfriend. She now says, in retrospect, that he had the same convoluted thinking back then. He took it HARD when she broke up with him. And he wanted to argue that 6 should be called 18! They don't sound like aspie charateristics. Apparently his whole family is like that.



MrXxx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2010
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,760
Location: New England

14 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm

Cornflake wrote:
I just think it's incredibly sad that this poor kid is having anything whatever discussed or analyzed about him in public, when the only source of information is the news media.

That trustworthy bastion of wholesomeness and unvarnished truth, gloriously free of partisan interests, never having an axe to grind, never feeling compelled to spin out any old sensationalist crap because it would make money.
Oh no; not ever would this be remotely true of the media...

We. Do. Not. Have. The. Facts.
Speculation. Is. Pointless.


Hear! Hear!

And 'NUFF said.

Reaching ANY conclusions whatsoever from information provided by the media is just...

well...




STOOPID.


_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

14 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm

Cornflake wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
do not insult our collective intelligence with your bs anymore.
:roll: That's pretty rich, considering what preceded it from you, and I think it would have only been polite to let me know in advance that, apparently, you're the arbiter of "our collective intelligence".
At least then I would have known who I should have come to, cap in hand and seeking approval, before audaciously giving my opinion in an open forum.

Quote:
Why is it he targeted (..)
It's so obvious why he chose her.
Not only her, but he went on a shooting spree in a place where the people who voted for her and her staff would be.
He wanted to attack her, (...)
Why is that obvious fact (...)
It was cunning on his part (...)
I see.
Since you have so many facts on this, maybe you should offer your services to the Police?
I'm sure they'd find it all very useful. I mean, you clearly have all the details and likely Jared would be frying in no time at all - and wouldn't that be lovely?

Or is it all just speculation?
Why lordy me, I do believe it is.
Rather neatly, you've demonstrated exactly the pointlessness of speculation.

But what shocks and disappoints me so much is that here, of all places, people are piling into this guy and dissecting out "facts" about his mental state from, well, absolutely nothing whatever.
That's just sickening.

It's not pointless. I only type it because you won't see any of it in the media. It will just be the same cliches and stereotypes. Loner. Mental Illness. Deranged Killer. Even if there's more to this than such simplicity.

Fact: Jared Lee Loughner was sane enough to rent a hotel room at a Motel Six near his parent's house the night before the shooting spree

Fact: Jared Lee Loughner was stopped by the Arizona wildlife and game police officer approximately 7:30 am the morning of the shooting. He ran a stop light. The police office didn't see a raving lunatic. In fact, he let Loughner go with a warning, not even a ticket, for running a red light. Now, who does that? When people run red lights, they generally get ticketed for it, not warnings.

Doesn't sound the least bit insane to me. In fact, he must have appeared especially nice and innocuous to the cop since he gave the dude a warning. The dude didn't even merit a ticket for running a red light? It's the rare exception, not the rule.

So, you have to put two and two together and if it equals five or seven, it must be incorrect or someone added different numbers.

The collective intelligence deserves better investigative forthrightness.

What's more, I wonder if he was with someone at the Motel Six. If he was, will we ever be privy to it? It will be hard to prove if someone visited once he got the room. There is evidence the key card was used a lot. If someone did visit him, it's not like they are going to come out and say unless the investigators discover it first.

Far from being mentally ill, Loughner does fit the profile of a psychopath.



TPE2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,461

14 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Cornflake wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
do not insult our collective intelligence with your bs anymore.
:roll: That's pretty rich, considering what preceded it from you, and I think it would have only been polite to let me know in advance that, apparently, you're the arbiter of "our collective intelligence".
At least then I would have known who I should have come to, cap in hand and seeking approval, before audaciously giving my opinion in an open forum.

Quote:
Why is it he targeted (..)
It's so obvious why he chose her.
Not only her, but he went on a shooting spree in a place where the people who voted for her and her staff would be.
He wanted to attack her, (...)
Why is that obvious fact (...)
It was cunning on his part (...)
I see.
Since you have so many facts on this, maybe you should offer your services to the Police?
I'm sure they'd find it all very useful. I mean, you clearly have all the details and likely Jared would be frying in no time at all - and wouldn't that be lovely?

Or is it all just speculation?
Why lordy me, I do believe it is.
Rather neatly, you've demonstrated exactly the pointlessness of speculation.

But what shocks and disappoints me so much is that here, of all places, people are piling into this guy and dissecting out "facts" about his mental state from, well, absolutely nothing whatever.
That's just sickening.

It's not pointless. I only type it because you won't see any of it in the media. It will just be the same cliches and stereotypes. Loner. Mental Illness. Deranged Killer. Even if there's more to this than such simplicity.

Fact: Jared Lee Loughner was sane enough to rent a hotel room at a Motel Six near his parent's house the night before the shooting spree

Fact: Jared Lee Loughner was stopped by the Arizona wildlife and game police officer approximately 7:30 am the morning of the shooting. He ran a stop light. The police office didn't see a raving lunatic. In fact, he let Loughner go with a warning, not even a ticket, for running a red light. Now, who does that? When people run red lights, they generally get ticketed for it, not warnings.

Doesn't sound the least bit insane to me. In fact, he must have appeared especially nice and innocuous to the cop since he gave the dude a warning. The dude didn't even merit a ticket for running a red light? It's the rare exception, not the rule.

So, you have to put two and two together and if it equals five or seven, it must be incorrect or someone added different numbers.

The collective intelligence deserves better investigative forthrightness.

What's more, I wonder if he was with someone at the Motel Six. If he was, will we ever be privy to it? It will be hard to prove if someone visited once he got the room. There is evidence the key card was used a lot. If someone did visit him, it's not like they are going to come out and say unless the investigators discover it first.

Far from being mentally ill, Loughner does fit the profile of a psychopath.


Again, I think that you are confusing "insanity" with "stupidity" - you can be "insane" in the sense of having a distorted perception of reality, but have a perfect logical behavior in the context of this distorted perception.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

14 Jan 2011, 9:25 pm

TPE2 wrote:
Again, I think that you are confusing "insanity" with "stupidity" - you can be "insane" in the sense of having a distorted perception of reality, but have a perfect logical behavior in the context of this distorted perception.


What appears to be stupidity is actually disorganization.

Loughner appears to have a personality disorder, not a full blown mental illness, and here's why: Rationality is a factor. If Loughner were insane, he would have blurted out stuff to the police officer, or tipped off someone at the Motel six.
He is a lot saner than the media would have him appear.
There are people who are mentally ill with such a high level of disorganization they could never pull off a crime such as this, even if under the influence of a delusion. The organization just isn't there. Loughner was highly organized. This contradicts the idea that he was insane just before or during the shooting at the Safeway.



Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 68,708
Location: Over there

14 Jan 2011, 9:36 pm

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
It's not pointless. (...)

And so on, and on, and on with more "facts".

I've said all I needed to but if you feel the need to continue inventing conspiracy theories then go right ahead.
Knock yourself out. Please.


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

14 Jan 2011, 9:42 pm

Cornflake wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
It's not pointless. (...)

And so on, and on, and on with more "facts".

I've said all I needed to but if you feel the need to continue inventing conspiracy theories then go right ahead.
Knock yourself out. Please.


People have a right to disagree with presentation and there are a lot of inconsistencies already.