Interview With Simon Baron Cohen - Need Your Help

Page 5 of 6 [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Ai_Ling
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,891

03 Dec 2011, 11:02 pm

Nier wrote:
Ai_Ling wrote:
1) Why does he refer to things such as male mind and female mind? Considering that the reference of gender stereotyping is politically incorrect. Why doesn't he just leave it as empathizing vs. systematizing.
.......
7) How did he get his samples of people? Researchers can easily skew results based on select samples of people.

8) What is his perspective on female aspies/autistics incorporated into this whole autism male brain theory.


I came across a recent blog critique of this (Link).
To quote the parts most relevant to here :

First, the whole concept of "systematizing" is due to Baron-Cohen. He created this concept and he markets it. As I have written earlier, the questionnaire he used to define "systematizing" behavior is loaded with bad questions which, whether intended or not, will confuse gender roles with "systematizing" behavior. To understand what he really intends by the term, let's just say that he believes men are logical and women are emotional.*:

In his book "The Essential Difference," the Cambridge University neuroscientist Simon Baron-Cohen wrote: “The female brain is predominately hard-wired for empathy. The male brain is predominately hard-wired for understanding and building systems.”

Second, the concept of "an extreme male brain" as the autistic mind is also his. He assigns emotional brains to the female sex and logical brains to the male sex, never mind that even his biased test cannot get there and never mind that there is no reason why the two characteristics should not be both present at the same time, both high or both low and so on...
...
"Cambridge University’s Autism Research Centre is now asking members of the public who are graduates and parents to take part in a survey which will investigate any links between educational achievement, what kind of job they have and how their children develop."

(This) new study will attempt to find out whether two ‘strong systemisers’ do indeed have a higher chance of producing autistic children.

Note,...that the planned study is already endangered. He is asking people to self-select for the study, while openly informing the potential participants what it is that he hopes to find.


So, why does he only look for supporting evidence for his own theories? Why not consider that his tests are skewed ? Why let test participants self-select based on announced expected outcomes? Why continue the circular referential confirmation that was present from Asperger onwards in only looking for behaviour according to male specific traits ? Shouldn't funding go to better designed studies? Who is out there who is countering his theories on a similar level of professional standing and funding ? Is it truly democratic or personality cult based?

That may not have been civil enough. Mind you, if it were more civil it would be 3 times as long and less understandable. :?


Its a sense of gender streotyping. Of course doing gender studies is huge because its a topic which people are interested in. He obviously came in with the bias and was therefore looking for ways to support his bias. With gender there is always a lot of debate. I think the factors which he was looking for X'ed out the different types of empathy out there. Perhaps autistics both have systemizing and empathetic parts to there brain but the empathy shows itself in abnormal ways. I suspect he might've been going off of some autistic streotypes as well.



Tuttle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,088
Location: Massachusetts

03 Dec 2011, 11:22 pm

fraac wrote:
If someone believes you're good at puzzles but you have no self-awareness, they'll talk to you like you're an idiot.


I've not found this at all true in my experiences. Maybe your experiences are different, but mine definitely don't agree with this.

I am incredibly weak at self-awareness. I'm open about this fact. Others have made it clear that they knew this before I'd realized this (how weak I am I hadn't realized until after my diagnosis).

Yet people's views of me, and how they've talked to me had no level of talking to me like I'm an idiot. They've talked to me like I'm good at puzzles. They've talked to me like I'm good at math.

The fact that I have poor self-awareness doesn't change that I'm one of few people they've ever seen who can tutor in math by truly enjoying math, rather than focusing on making people memorize useless facts.



fraac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,865

04 Dec 2011, 12:13 am

offtopic:

How does poor self-awareness manifest? People without much self-awareness usually can't talk about it, because then they would have self-awareness. Please talk about it.



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

04 Dec 2011, 12:59 am

If I have no empathy why are you answering me so politely? I'm just writing this down, it's not a video.
Feel free to answer me like I'm a computer voice message system.

Frances



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

04 Dec 2011, 1:09 am

Or you could just say "Dude, I have no empathy so it's ok if I'm rude with you. I gotta ask. WTF is wrong with you? I mean really. Look at all this crap you wrote..." Then pick him apart piece by piece and as he starts getting more upset remind him that acting that way doesn't help because you have no empathy.

Also, how much does he make? Does he have a pony for his kids? What if they made unicorns, would he get one for them? Because unicorns fart glitter and that would be cool. How does he feel about that aspect of unicorns?

Then get right back totally on subject like you never left and deny any asking of unicorn or pony related questions.

Frances



Tuttle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,088
Location: Massachusetts

04 Dec 2011, 1:13 am

fraac wrote:
offtopic:

How does poor self-awareness manifest? People without much self-awareness usually can't talk about it, because then they would have self-awareness. Please talk about it.


I regularly can't identify my own emotions.
I regularly can't tell if I'm hungry, thirsty, tired, etc, until I'm getting a headache.
I can't identify very well where my body is physically.
I've been unaware of difficulties I have until others point them out.

There's probably more too, but I've been sleeping all day, sick, and can't think very well right now.

As for why I can talk about it - well others point it out, and especially when they point out examples I can figure out that what they're saying makes sense.



fraac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,865

04 Dec 2011, 1:45 am

Hm, fascinating.

OliveOilMom wrote:
Or you could just say "Dude, I have no empathy so it's ok if I'm rude with you. I gotta ask. WTF is wrong with you? I mean really. Look at all this crap you wrote..." Then pick him apart piece by piece and as he starts getting more upset remind him that acting that way doesn't help because you have no empathy.

Also, how much does he make? Does he have a pony for his kids? What if they made unicorns, would he get one for them? Because unicorns fart glitter and that would be cool. How does he feel about that aspect of unicorns?

Then get right back totally on subject like you never left and deny any asking of unicorn or pony related questions.


YES.



TheSunAlsoRises
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,039

04 Dec 2011, 2:34 am

fraac wrote:
offtopic:

How does poor self-awareness manifest? People without much self-awareness usually can't talk about it, because then they would have self-awareness. Please talk about it.


Someone who has very little ability at recognizing their own feelings, traits, and behaviors has poor self-awareness. This is a problem with a lot of neuro-typicals so don't fret. However, it is very significant to someone who appears to begin early development with minimal or a different orientation toward human contact. I can argue that a give and take between self and others during early development is imperative or is at-least a great advantage in the development of self-awareness.

Examples: A person who constantly gets taking advantage of with regards to the same situations. A person who unaware reacts inappropriately in a particular social situation. A person who has talent in different areas but does not recognize those talents in themselves. Etc, Etc..........

Life experience is capable of teaching you a lot and one of those things might be self awareness. How ? You will keep banging your head against the proverbial wall until you do some self reflecting or a person(s) will comment on it, often enough.

Once again, i want to re-iterate, lack of self awareness is common and prevalent amongst neuro-typicals, like quite a few things, its a spectrum. Some people have very good self awareness, others have very (different) or poor self-awareness. However, just about anything, which involves the use of the social mind based on neuro-typical values, traditions, or mores, is probably going to have a greater effect on the Autistic.

Whenever you read information regarding the Autistic's abilities or disabilities always think in terms of SPECTRUM or DIFFERENCES. The spectrum or differences may possibly be wide or narrow/long or short as compared to neuro-typicals. And, you know what ? IT may or may not include you and that's O.K.

TheSunAlsoRises



fraac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,865

04 Dec 2011, 2:45 am

I hadn't heard of autistics lacking self-awareness before, except by SBC's weird definition of it.



TheSunAlsoRises
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,039

04 Dec 2011, 3:25 am

fraac wrote:
I hadn't heard of autistics lacking self-awareness before, except by SBC's weird definition of it.


Well, you have to take into account his major research interests, one being ToM.

TheSunAlsoRises



Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,777
Location: USA

04 Dec 2011, 9:57 am

Ok, I do lack quite a bit of self-awareness, by this defination at least.


_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes

Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html


TheSunAlsoRises
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,039

04 Dec 2011, 11:31 am

Tuttle wrote:
fraac wrote:
If someone believes you're good at puzzles but you have no self-awareness, they'll talk to you like you're an idiot.


I've not found this at all true in my experiences. Maybe your experiences are different, but mine definitely don't agree with this.

I am incredibly weak at self-awareness. I'm open about this fact. Others have made it clear that they knew this before I'd realized this (how weak I am I hadn't realized until after my diagnosis).

Yet people's views of me, and how they've talked to me had no level of talking to me like I'm an idiot. They've talked to me like I'm good at puzzles. They've talked to me like I'm good at math.

The fact that I have poor self-awareness doesn't change that I'm one of few people they've ever seen who can tutor in math by truly enjoying math, rather than focusing on making people memorize useless facts.


This is the way, it's done. You're difficulties in certain areas does not prevent your strengths from shining bright in other areas.

TheSunAlsoRises



fraac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,865

04 Dec 2011, 7:16 pm

TM, you could challenge him with quotes from other autism researchers. Jon Brock said*, "To me, systemizing is a hand-wavy description of 'male thinking' masquerading as a cognitive theory. So devising a test for it is near impossible." Then ask anything related.

* http://autismcrisis.blogspot.com/2011/0 ... 9053288939



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

04 Dec 2011, 7:25 pm

I thought of another humorous question to ask which would be kind of smart alecy mocking him and his views of how we are all this one way.

Ask him if he likes Judge Wopner.

After several questions of this style, he may suspect that you are mocking him. You can answer "No, I don't understand how to, don't you know that?"

Frances



TheSunAlsoRises
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,039

04 Dec 2011, 10:15 pm

fraac wrote:
TM, you could challenge him with quotes from other autism researchers. Jon Brock said*, "To me, systemizing is a hand-wavy description of 'male thinking' masquerading as a cognitive theory. So devising a test for it is near impossible." Then ask anything related.

* http://autismcrisis.blogspot.com/2011/0 ... 9053288939


NOT impossible, near impossible. I thrive off of impossible odds, near impossible odds puts the odds in my favor.

TheSunAlsoRises



fraac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,865

04 Dec 2011, 10:24 pm

It's impossible because 'systemising' is yet more SBC junk theorising.