AspieUtah wrote:
yournamehere wrote:
From what I have read, I would hardly call level one "mild". That is a fairly serious issue that any NT would not be in a position to be o.k. with, if the shoe was on the other foot.
Level zero doesn't even make sence. The multiplication of anything times zero is zero.
ASD level zero just doesn't cancel itself out because you have it?
It is a stupid form of interpretation, not unlike over engineering, created by over educated people that are not in the position of a person with an ASD.
And that is nothing new.
That is just my opinion.
I agree. So, are you, therefore, advocating that ASD level 0 could exist as a stand-alone diagnosis? That would contradict the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, but I agree wholeheartedly that the logic takes us there. Why even create an ASD level 0 if it means that no such diagnosis could exist?
Again, the cartel is convoluted.
Well of course. It lookd clearly to me like a brush it under the carpet tactic. Everybody has their problems right?
I would also like to add another interesting point that makes no sence.
Human life had been structured to require support. Nobody can live without a support structure. It is a community based environment. The most important, and biggest things require the most support. If there is no support structures in place for human kind, all there is, is a house of glass.
So what are we talking about here?
I just logically dismembered the whole DSM ASD support structure, and turned it into the same stuff that everyone else has to deal with.
Just for fun.