Page 5 of 5 [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

22 Jul 2005, 1:15 pm

Malcolm_Scipo wrote:
Sophist wrote:
God dam* religious zealots. They'll be the first to destroy the world.

No. That will be the fascists who destroy the world. Then the zealots.

I'd put my money on wishy-washy do-gooding liberals. :lol:



Malcolm_Scipo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,007

22 Jul 2005, 1:18 pm

ascan wrote:
Malcolm_Scipo wrote:
Sophist wrote:
God dam* religious zealots. They'll be the first to destroy the world.

No. That will be the fascists who destroy the world. Then the zealots.

I'd put my money on wishy-washy do-gooding liberals. :lol:

And the super fat.


_________________
THOUGHT IT WAS THE END.
THOUGHT IT WAS THE 4TH OF JULY.
I WOKE UP AND THEN I REALISED,
I WAS NOT WHAT I HAD ALWAYS TRIED TO EMULATE.
INSTEAD A SHADOW OF FORMER GLORY.
AND THEN I CRIED.


eamonn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,301
Location: Scotland

22 Jul 2005, 3:42 pm

ascan wrote:
BeeBee wrote:
I beleive the guards should be tried and justice done....which, I beleive, is happening.

Yes, that should be done by the military. What shouldn't happen is that scum-of-the-earth newspapers use it to increase their sales by reporting an extremely one-sided account of something that is far from common place. That is completely irresponsible and against the national interest. It directly contributes to the problems our troops face in Iraq and, I believe, has much to do with why young "British" Muslims blow themselves up on London Buses.

I think the British media people responsible for propagating this kind of crap are traitors. Freedom of speech is fine, but those in the media who have such huge power and influence have great responsibility, too. They are clearly abusing that. In my opinion they are traitors, and should be rounded up, put to trial, then executed if found guilty.


Why the inverted commas over the bombers? They were born and raised in this country and that makes them british unless your definition of what is british is different than mine. How do you know that humiliation of iraqi citizens is far from commonplace? When were you last in iraq and did you head a fair and independant investigation on the issue of abuse? If the answer is never and no then im afraid im not just going to take your word for it. The way some muslim leaders here mention iraq is dangerous though. The bombers werent from iraq or afghanistan so to use occupation of the aforementioned countries as an excuse is sectarian in my opinion.



ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

23 Jul 2005, 3:43 am

eamonn wrote:
Why the inverted commas over the bombers?

Ah, so we meet again, eamonn :) .

The inverted commas are because in my eyes many of them are not British. Their loyalties lie in another country. If they want to be called British and support these terrorist acts, then they should be shot as traitors. If they don't believe they are British and voice support, they should be deported. Of course, I don't believe all British Muslims, or even a majority, are like that; but, many are.
eamonn wrote:
How do you know that humiliation of iraqi citizens is far from commonplace? When were you last in iraq and did you head a fair and independant investigation on the issue of abuse? If the answer is never and no then im afraid im not just going to take your word for it.

Well, I don't believe all the left-wing twaddle broadcast by the BBC or disseminated in the gutter-press tabloids. Also, I know our troops are well trained. And, to be perfectly honest, if a few looters get a good kicking from some squaddies, then all well and good. Also, I'm not so bloody naive as to believe that if you're captured and interrogated by the military, you're going to get a nice little chat over tea and biscuits :roll: .

Of course, I'm sure some excesses have occured. Do you really expect that in a situation like that they wouldn't? Remember what some of these soldiers have seen. Think of the stress they may have been through. But there are mechanisms within the military to deal with these things. It shouldn't be for civilians to stand in judgement of military personnel, nor for politicians to make scapegoats of them. There is no evidence that these "abuses" are endemic to our military organisation, thay are one-offs that could be expected. If you really want to fret over abuse, then I suggest you look at the Muslim world, or even at some of our European "allies". See how they treat people detained even under suspicion of minor crminal offences.



Malcolm_Scipo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,007

23 Jul 2005, 4:03 am

The truth is that we are screwed. Nice to see you, but due to recent events we are all going to have to kiss our ass goodbye.


_________________
THOUGHT IT WAS THE END.
THOUGHT IT WAS THE 4TH OF JULY.
I WOKE UP AND THEN I REALISED,
I WAS NOT WHAT I HAD ALWAYS TRIED TO EMULATE.
INSTEAD A SHADOW OF FORMER GLORY.
AND THEN I CRIED.


Wowbagger
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jun 2004
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 135
Location: Pittsburgh

23 Jul 2005, 7:14 am

Sean wrote:
It's too heavily populated. I'm not interested in visiting cities for the culture and there doesn't seem to be much left in the way of outdoor activities away from the cities anymore. A major european city would need an outstanding orchestra to go see if for me to go there for more than a connecting flight, and I could find that in Rome, Salzburg, Vienna, Prague, and Moscow. OK, so maybe I'd go to England to see the London Symphony Orchestra, find an early midevil castle or two to check out, and then leave.


The thing about London is that not only does it have at least four outstanding orchestras (LSO, LPO, Philharmonia, Royal Philharmonic), there're also plenty of great chamber music/solo recitals, and all the major European orchestras visit it fairly regularly. Even if continental Europe has a greater music history, London beats all for sheer quantity (although, unfortunately, all their major concert halls have unsatisfactory acoustics). I was in London for 5 days in June and watched three different orchestras, including Amsterdam's Royal Concertgebouw. In addition, probably because of this oversupply of good music, the prices (starting from around 6 pounds) are far friendlier than what'd you have to pay to watch the Vienna Philharmonic in their hometown. And if you go during the Proms, there are one or two concerts every night and visiting orchestras abound.



eamonn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,301
Location: Scotland

23 Jul 2005, 2:45 pm

ascan wrote:
eamonn wrote:
Why the inverted commas over the bombers?

Ah, so we meet again, eamonn :)
You sound like an evil supervillian! I can just imagine you stroking a cat as you say it. :)

ascan wrote:
It shouldn't be for civilians to stand in judgement of military personnel, nor for politicians to make scapegoats of them. There is no evidence that these "abuses" are endemic to our military organisation, thay are one-offs that could be expected. If you really want to fret over abuse, then I suggest you look at the Muslim world, or even at some of our European "allies". See how they treat people detained even under suspicion of minor crminal offences.


Abuse is endemic to the people inside the organisation so i find it hard to believe that it doesnt happen to the enemy. Should we just allow our soldiers to do as they wish without laws applying to them just because some of them have seen terrible things happen around them? I think they should know what they are getting themselves into by joining the army before they start pleading trauma. I mentioned the abuse in iraq because you said it is far from commonplace and i dont think you can really know that. I am aware of the terrible things that go on in too many muslim countries and think they should get their own house in order before being so forward in their criticism of the usa and brits but im from the "civilised" west and i expect human rights to mean something. Though we are let down on that front all too often.



Malcolm_Scipo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,007

24 Jul 2005, 1:49 am

Wowbagger wrote:
Sean wrote:
It's too heavily populated. I'm not interested in visiting cities for the culture and there doesn't seem to be much left in the way of outdoor activities away from the cities anymore. A major european city would need an outstanding orchestra to go see if for me to go there for more than a connecting flight, and I could find that in Rome, Salzburg, Vienna, Prague, and Moscow. OK, so maybe I'd go to England to see the London Symphony Orchestra, find an early midevil castle or two to check out, and then leave.


The thing about London is that not only does it have at least four outstanding orchestras (LSO, LPO, Philharmonia, Royal Philharmonic), there're also plenty of great chamber music/solo recitals, and all the major European orchestras visit it fairly regularly. Even if continental Europe has a greater music history, London beats all for sheer quantity (although, unfortunately, all their major concert halls have unsatisfactory acoustics). I was in London for 5 days in June and watched three different orchestras, including Amsterdam's Royal Concertgebouw. In addition, probably because of this oversupply of good music, the prices (starting from around 6 pounds) are far friendlier than what'd you have to pay to watch the Vienna Philharmonic in their hometown. And if you go during the Proms, there are one or two concerts every night and visiting orchestras abound.

Whoa! That is good.


_________________
THOUGHT IT WAS THE END.
THOUGHT IT WAS THE 4TH OF JULY.
I WOKE UP AND THEN I REALISED,
I WAS NOT WHAT I HAD ALWAYS TRIED TO EMULATE.
INSTEAD A SHADOW OF FORMER GLORY.
AND THEN I CRIED.