IsabellaLinton wrote:
Decoding written language is part of verbal, not non-verbal IQ.
Anything related to words is Verbal, even if the words are in print form.
Non-verbal measures our ability to see spatial patterns (shapes, colours, faces, sequences).
"Nonverbal intelligence describes thinking skills and problem-solving abilities that do not fundamentally require verbal language production and comprehension. This type of intelligence involves manipulating or problem solving about visual information and may vary in the amount of internalized, abstract, or conceptual reasoning and motor skills that are required to complete a task. Nonverbal intelligence is often closely linked with the Performance IQ domain of intellectual ability tests that evaluates nonverbal abilities, a domain which is often viewed in comparison to the Verbal IQ domain."
My instinct is that my (and my daughter's) decoding is an extension of our
visual and system intelligence. It was noted I read quickly but even after reading something three times (
too rapidly?), I didn't get it. I checked my WAIS: "Very Superior" for Perceptional Reasoning, Processing Speed, but "disabled" by Verbal Comprehension. My FSIQ was invalid since my VIQ was 25 points lower than my PIQ. Fairly ASD like if you ask my Evaluator. It would be nice if my daughter and I could hold intelligent conversations with other people. Sigh. At best we have the mumbling, bumbling professor stereotype to help us. Other people: "Gee, she must be really smart b/c she her complex concepts and thoughts defy words" and also "Gee, she must be really dumb b/c she can't put two words together". My grandmother "saw" words and felt them. I would bet her PIQ was likewise high and her VIQ was low -- too busy watching the words to be able to communicate effectively with them. RIP, Grandma --- misunderstood (and institutionalized).