Page 5 of 8 [ 118 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

faithfilly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 681
Location: New York State

23 Feb 2008, 8:03 am

Rob Nijssen not only is sorely lacking in logic, but he also sounds extremely arrogant!


_________________
"Has not my hand made all these things, and so they came into being?" declares the LORD. "This is the one I esteem: he who is humble and contrite in spirit, and trembles at my word." – Isaiah 66:2


pbcoll
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,892
Location: the City of Palaces

23 Feb 2008, 9:28 am

Zendell, if you haven't heard of cases in which chelation was fatal (yes, the case in which they were trying to cure a boy of autism), you don't know what you're talking about. Death seems to me to be a serious side-effect. Using it to 'cure' conditions other than heavy metal poisoning is dangerous quackery.


_________________
I am the steppenwolf that never learned to dance. (Sedaka)

El hombre es una bestia famélica, envidiosa e insaciable. (Francisco Tario)

I'm male by the way (yes, I know my avatar is misleading).


zendell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,174
Location: Austin, TX

23 Feb 2008, 12:03 pm

NewportBeachDude wrote:
When we got our diagnosis they offered us Ritalin. A good 60% I'd say of the parents we know with spectrum kids have them on drugs...Ritalin (modern med) does a good job for many people we know, but our route serves our kid just as well.


I think it's interesting that doctors prescribe Ritalin to treat autism because:
1. Ritalin has never been proven effective for autism (although it works for ADHD)

2. Ritalin (brand name of methylphenidate) is dangerous and deadly. It is estimated that Ritalin had killed about 1,240 people between 1990 and 2000. http://www.ritalindeath.com

3. The autism research institute collects parent observations on autism treatments. Of the more than 4,000 parents who gave their autistic children Ritalin, 44% got worse, 26% had no improvement, and only 29% got better. With chelation therapy, which is far more safer than Ritalin, only 3% got worse, 24% had no improvement, and 73% got better.

Ritalin versus Chelation
Neither proven effective
Ancedotal reports indicate chelation is very effective whereas Ritalin doesn't work well
Deaths due to Ritalin - 1,240
Deaths due to chelation - 3 out of over 10 million treatments (1 per 3.3 million). Many prescription drugs kill far more often than 1 in 3 million.

My problem with conventional Western medicine is that doctors recommend dangerous and ineffective treatments while warning their patients to avoid safer, more effective treatments.

When it comes to vitamins and minerals, doctors demand extensive proof (which will never occur because they can't be patented so they will never be fully studies). Yet when it comes to dangerous drugs, no evidence of effectiveness is required.

Vitamin B6, vitamin C, and magnesium have been found effective in treating autism, have virtually no risks or side-effects and are inexpensive. Conventional doctors warn their patients to avoid vitamins (saying they haven't been conclusively proven effective) and then recommend unproven dangerous drugs instead that only benefit the pharmaceutical companies.



KimJ
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,418
Location: Arizona

23 Feb 2008, 12:36 pm

I may rattle cages here but a lot of people think that the hyperactivity that occurs in autism is due to a secondary diagnosis of ADHD. I don't believe it. I don't believe it because I saw my son before we introduced schedules and methods of communication. He presented in a very disorganized manner, jumping around, unable to focus and having tantrums that could go on forever if left unchecked or redirected by a camera flash.
Sounds like ADHD, huh? But it wasn't. It was very disorganized thinking and a lack of communication. He was 2 1/2 and we were offered Ritalin. Parents that were given the stuff sung its praises for about 3 weeks, then took their kids off it silently. It had stopped working.

Once my son was able to communicate, he became a lot more focused and organized. Able to ask for wants and needs rather than tantrum.



NewportBeachDude
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 355

23 Feb 2008, 7:27 pm

zendell wrote:
NewportBeachDude wrote:
When we got our diagnosis they offered us Ritalin. A good 60% I'd say of the parents we know with spectrum kids have them on drugs...Ritalin (modern med) does a good job for many people we know, but our route serves our kid just as well.


I think it's interesting that doctors prescribe Ritalin to treat autism because:
1. Ritalin has never been proven effective for autism (although it works for ADHD)

2. Ritalin (brand name of methylphenidate) is dangerous and deadly. It is estimated that Ritalin had killed about 1,240 people between 1990 and 2000. http://www.ritalindeath.com

3. The autism research institute collects parent observations on autism treatments. Of the more than 4,000 parents who gave their autistic children Ritalin, 44% got worse, 26% had no improvement, and only 29% got better. With chelation therapy, which is far more safer than Ritalin, only 3% got worse, 24% had no improvement, and 73% got better.

Ritalin versus Chelation
Neither proven effective
Ancedotal reports indicate chelation is very effective whereas Ritalin doesn't work well
Deaths due to Ritalin - 1,240
Deaths due to chelation - 3 out of over 10 million treatments (1 per 3.3 million). Many prescription drugs kill far more often than 1 in 3 million.

My problem with conventional Western medicine is that doctors recommend dangerous and ineffective treatments while warning their patients to avoid safer, more effective treatments.

When it comes to vitamins and minerals, doctors demand extensive proof (which will never occur because they can't be patented so they will never be fully studies). Yet when it comes to dangerous drugs, no evidence of effectiveness is required.

Vitamin B6, vitamin C, and magnesium have been found effective in treating autism, have virtually no risks or side-effects and are inexpensive. Conventional doctors warn their patients to avoid vitamins (saying they haven't been conclusively proven effective) and then recommend unproven dangerous drugs instead that only benefit the pharmaceutical companies.



Zendell, Ritalin is commonly prescribed for Autistic kids with the most severe cases of sensory overload and attention deficits. Some may say these are comorbids, but they come with the territory of Autism. If you pick up any book on Autism Treatment, Ritalin is normally one of the drugs listed in that book to treat it. It wakes up the brain and stimulates the central nervous system. It shows good effects in some kids because it arouses the pathways responsible for focus and attention and we personally know many families that have success with it or a generic.

We don't know anyone who's been on it for years and years, but that's definately a consideration of safety when taking any drug long term. The route we took is a natural one, but that won't work for every person with Autism.



TLPG
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 693

26 Feb 2008, 5:12 am

sinsboldly wrote:
TLPG wrote:
If you want to look at it from one point of view - yeah maybe it is.

It's my favourite saying - but there is a caveat attached, and that's the "right". One thing no one has the right to do is endanger their own or an other's life. I find it hard to fathom that anyone being themselves would willingly do that.

And on your other quote - yeah death comes to all of us. My point was for those with MS it comes a lot sooner than it otherwise would.


I can see we disagree on several points, but I am not interested in changing your mind on any of the points. I am just interested on expressing myself about how I see what your thoughts evoked in me.

I am not convinced that I don't have the right to endanger or even end my life at my choice. I didn't sign any social contract nor do I buy into any religious schema that would have me live other than my own situation dictates.

and also, one is not given a specific time of life. MS might cause one to expire before others may, but even someone with a fatal disease can get hit by a bus and expire before their shortened lifetime. One has no 'right' to a specific length of life, it's pretty much a twirl of the dice.

just sayin'

Merle


I'm not saying there is a specific time of life, but one has the right to live as long a life as possible. Things happen of course - you could be struck and killed outright by a car for example, amongst a plethora of other things. But that's beyond your control.

What about the things WITHIN your control? THAT is where I'm talking about lifetime - and choices. What I'm saying is that it is the wrong choice to do something that threatens your own life or that of others when what you are trying to achieve can be achieved by other less threatening ways.

Just throwing that out there.

As for Zendell - he finally hit the bottom of the barrel believing that cancer may not have existed 100 years ago. Sorry! It did. It just hadn't been discovered yet. 100 years ago there would have been plenty of death certificates that would have been incorrect because they don't really know what caused the death.



Wolfpup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,409
Location: Central Illinois, USA

26 Feb 2008, 10:48 am

Heck, I just heard a story on NPR this morning about yellow fever in 1878. People didn't know what caused it-that doesn't mean there weren't viri!



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

26 Feb 2008, 12:55 pm

TLPG wrote:

As for Zendell - he finally hit the bottom of the barrel believing that cancer may not have existed 100 years ago. Sorry! It did. It just hadn't been discovered yet. 100 years ago there would have been plenty of death certificates that would have been incorrect because they don't really know what caused the death.


Some people are narrow in their focus, that is true. In 1908 my grandfather was alive, my father was born in 1912, so it really wasn't back in the dark ages ( I promise!) The idea that cancer is some new disease is just one of those things you shake your head at while trying not to chuckle - not at someone's ignorance, but at the idea someone would not just do one little Google search to keep from being chuckled at.

one pass of Google gave me 10,600,000 hits just for history of cancer, alone.

Oldest Descriptions of Cancer (because I like to document)

Cancer has afflicted humans throughout recorded history. It is no surprise that from the dawn of history doctors have written about cancer. Some of the earliest evidence of cancer is found among fossilized bone tumors, human mummies in ancient Egypt, and ancient manuscripts. Bone remains of mummies have revealed growths suggestive of the bone cancer, osteosarcoma. In other cases, bony skull destruction as seen in cancer of the head and neck has been found.

Our oldest description of cancer (although the term cancer was not used) was discovered in Egypt and dates back to approximately 1600 B.C. The Edwin Smith Papyrus, or writing, describes 8 cases of tumors or ulcers of the breast that were treated by cauterization, with a tool called "the fire drill." The writing says about the disease, "There is no treatment."

Origin of the Word Cancer

The origin of the word cancer is credited to the Greek physician Hippocrates (460-370 B.C.), considered the "Father of Medicine." Hippocrates used the terms carcinos and carcinoma to describe non-ulcer forming and ulcer-forming tumors. In Greek these words refer to a crab, most likely applied to the disease because the finger-like spreading projections from a cancer called to mind the shape of a crab. Carcinoma is the most common type of cancer.



zendell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,174
Location: Austin, TX

26 Feb 2008, 2:51 pm

Some doctors who practiced at the time stated that it wasn't until vaccines were introduced that cancer started becoming a problem.



Wolfpup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,409
Location: Central Illinois, USA

26 Feb 2008, 2:59 pm

Even if some said that, that's quite obviously bogus from everything we know. I mean maybe it's more of a "problem" because you have a better shot of living to be older, but other than that...



TLPG
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 693

26 Feb 2008, 5:01 pm

zendell wrote:
Some doctors who practiced at the time stated that it wasn't until vaccines were introduced that cancer started becoming a problem.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! !! !!

I'm sorry - but that is hilarious such is the sheer.....no I won't say it!

I'll tell you two things (that have nothing to do with vaccines) that created bigger problems with cancer.

Smoking
Smaller bathing costumes (skin cancer)

Of course it's not that by itself - it's the attached attitude as well.



AspieDave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 568
Location: Traverse City, Michigan

26 Feb 2008, 5:22 pm

In 1978 the sale of lead based paint was banned.... in 1996 the sale of leaded gasoline was banned.... Autism rates are rising... WOW!! ! Autism is caused by a lack of lead pollution in the environment!! ! Maybe we should introduce lead into the vaccines... prevent all those nasty autism diseases and make Jenny McCarthy shut the hell up....

:twisted:

Who wants to get in on the start of a NEW conspiracy theory?? Just step right in and repost that out to the conspiracy theory sites. Hmmm... maybe we should donate it to Autism Speaks, they can fund a $12 million study.


_________________
I tried to get in touch with my feminine side.... but it got a restraining order.....


Wolfpup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,409
Location: Central Illinois, USA

26 Feb 2008, 6:04 pm

That's a hilarious conspiracy theory!



srriv345
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 523

26 Feb 2008, 6:44 pm

zendell wrote:
Some doctors who practiced at the time stated that it wasn't until vaccines were introduced that cancer started becoming a problem.


And of course we should believe them and not the numerous pre-1940 documentation which discuss "cancer" and come up with the term "cancer."



TLPG
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 693

27 Feb 2008, 5:50 am

AspieDave wrote:
In 1978 the sale of lead based paint was banned.... in 1996 the sale of leaded gasoline was banned.... Autism rates are rising... WOW!! ! Autism is caused by a lack of lead pollution in the environment!! ! Maybe we should introduce lead into the vaccines... prevent all those nasty autism diseases and make Jenny McCarthy shut the hell up....

:twisted:


Here's an addition! The Roman Empire collapsed because of LEAD POISONING in their water supply! That's why there wasn't any Autism around in that region - too much lead!

:twisted: :twisted:

(Good one, Dave! I like your style!)



zendell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,174
Location: Austin, TX

27 Feb 2008, 5:53 am

TLPG wrote:
AspieDave wrote:
In 1978 the sale of lead based paint was banned.... in 1996 the sale of leaded gasoline was banned.... Autism rates are rising... WOW!! ! Autism is caused by a lack of lead pollution in the environment!! ! Maybe we should introduce lead into the vaccines... prevent all those nasty autism diseases and make Jenny McCarthy shut the hell up....

:twisted:


Here's an addition! The Roman Empire collapsed because of LEAD POISONING in their water supply! That's why there wasn't any Autism around in that region - too much lead!

:twisted: :twisted:

(Good one, Dave! I like your style!)


Not even worth responding to since you two seem to have no desire for the truth.