anyone else find IQ test-score threads funny?

Page 5 of 5 [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5


Do you think your IQ score is important?
Yes 22%  22%  [ 10 ]
No 78%  78%  [ 35 ]
Total votes : 45

twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

17 Mar 2009, 7:24 pm

garyww wrote:
I do agree that more people than ever are being educated but the extent or quality of that education is pitiful compared to what it once was. Since I study textbooks I can show you the difference in content that has changed since the 1800's up to the present time at all levels including college and don't even get me going about the Ebonics experiments.

While I do not doubt there has been a significant deterioration in quality, this does not address 1) what the effect on IQ was 2) How much of what used to be taught was learned by how many people. A lot of the working class people who were forced through my schools couldn't even learn what was taught, let alone any more.

2ukenkerl wrote:
MAN, you have been BRAINWASHED!! !! !! They USED to hire people with an average of a highschool degree! There weren't that many colleges. NOW, there are MORE colleges, and people EXPECT it! So availability of the title went up, and perceived need went up. Those TWO things would increase the figures, as you stated, ALONE! LOANS have increased! SCHOLARSHIPS have increased! Those TWO things would increase the figures, as you stated, ALONE! There are a LOT of crazy "majors". There are "diploma mills". There are LIARS! Need I REALLY go on? You show something that has NO real purpose! Going to college MIGHT teach the person more, but it does NOT necessarily make them smarter. A LOT of college students/graduates do some pretty STUPID things!

HECK, you don't even say WHAT the degrees were in, or the school that awarded them. A degree in german to a native german is NOT as good as a nobel peace prize, for a WORTHWHILE discovery, given to a nuclear scientist fresh out of college. An ITT diploma is not worth an MIT one.

Umm... how is any of that tirade relevant to my point? In fact, that graph was used to specifically address the topic of education deterioration. The IQ data, I have no need to justify any further because the case is closed as far as this thread is concerned: IQ has been going up. EOM


_________________
* here for the nachos.


garyww
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2008
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,395
Location: Napa, California

17 Mar 2009, 7:25 pm

I have a small collection of very old documents writen by both well educated and marginally educated people from several periods in history and you are correct in that even a marginally literate cowboy appears to be well educated, with beautiful penmenshipin the typical letters they wrote back home. I have seen the notes left by members of the Donner party, some who were supposedly illiterate, but still manged to write some beautuful last thoughts. There is no doubt in my mind that general knowledge has been incredibly dumbed down over time as the role of specialist has risen in society.


_________________
I am one of those people who your mother used to warn you about.


garyww
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2008
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,395
Location: Napa, California

17 Mar 2009, 7:28 pm

I'm not sure IQ relates to general intelligence and as to how many learned what was taught, according to the enriollment records and report cards the success rate was far higher in the past than it is today, like a 85% graduation rate compared to around 50% in california.


_________________
I am one of those people who your mother used to warn you about.


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

17 Mar 2009, 7:29 pm

Raised and educated in the US? Most likely they wrote it themselves. Sometimes, though, illiterates and non english immigrants would talk someone into writing letters for them.



garyww
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2008
Age: 76
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,395
Location: Napa, California

17 Mar 2009, 7:39 pm

it was a polite custom in the 'old' days for the letter writer to acknowledge the transcriber so we generally have a notation about who wrote for who. Even low class rough working men after around 1880 could read and write, usually better than most college students of today.
You would be amazed at the mathematical notations laborers scribled on the backs of paneling in old houses that are demolished. None of this is surprising to historians but science types find it hard to believe that todays society is not as cutting edge as they imagine it is.


_________________
I am one of those people who your mother used to warn you about.


2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

17 Mar 2009, 7:49 pm

BTW do you REALLY want to know about how stupid people are TODAY vs. 40 years ago?

About 40 years ago, someone created a standard that could go up to 4294967296! HEY, in THOSE days it was EXPENSIVE, and the yield was LOW! They decided that 4294967296 was MORE than what they needed, so they reduced it to about 2147483648! After all, that was STILL more than they needed! After all, HOW long would it be before someone used 549GB for storage, or have a file bigger than 2GB? If the time EVER arose, SOMEONE would increase it! RIGHT? BTW the magical 2147483648 number was used for MANY things! They even used it for DATES!! !! !! 68 years! 35 days 3 hours 14 minutes 8 seconds! DON'T WORRY! There is an epoch of 1970, so that is 2/4/2038 3:14:8. I guess I made a mistake, wikipedia says it is 03:14:07 UTC on Tuesday, 19 January 2038. 8-( Oh well. Anyway, back to the deal.....

A bit more than 10 years later, a little company called Microsoft decided to COPY an OLD system, and use ANOTHER magic number! 65535! That limited them to a disk size of 33,553,920(The famous 32MB limit on FAT)! They were ALREADY behind the times! SURE, most couldn't afford them, but there WERE larger drives. It took them MANY years to use the 2147483648 number(FAT32), and then have clustering, etc....

OK, back to the 4294967296 number. They decided to use it for NETWORKING! I mean WHAT company has that many systems? HOW could the internet get that large? In fact, they reduced it to about 3/4 the amount. The other 1/4 were reserved for testing, services, and VPNs!

So WHAT is the outcome?

Late 60s? An INCREDIBLE 3 BILLION+ systems, 2GB, and it only required 4 processing units(most computers were 8 bit or had 8 bit registers). Over 68 YEARS to improve at a modest cost.

Late 90s? A PALTRY 3 BILLION+ systems, many things STILL limited to 2GB, and it requires only 1 processing unit(most computers were 32 bits, or easily acted like it). Only 38 years to fix it at an INCREDIBLE cost that nobody can even estimate.

If the people in 1990 were SO much smarter, WHY didn't they fix even ONE problem? Even the "Y2K" fix RARELY even ACKNOWLEDGED the 2038 problem! Many systems will likely break that day! I may be dead before then but, if I am not, I may LITERALLY die LAUGHING!



2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

17 Mar 2009, 7:51 pm

twoshots wrote:
Umm... how is any of that tirade relevant to my point? In fact, that graph was used to specifically address the topic of education deterioration. The IQ data, I have no need to justify any further because the case is closed as far as this thread is concerned: IQ has been going up. EOM


How come you haven't gone up with the tide then?



Whimsi-Cal
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 3 Mar 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 120

17 Mar 2009, 7:56 pm

nothingunusual wrote:
It's as if IQ scores were the Asperger's equivalent to penis (or breast) size. :roll:


Because those with the small ones are the people most offended. :lol:



2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

17 Mar 2009, 7:59 pm

garyww wrote:
it was a polite custom in the 'old' days for the letter writer to acknowledge the transcriber so we generally have a notation about who wrote for who. Even low class rough working men after around 1880 could read and write, usually better than most college students of today.
You would be amazed at the mathematical notations laborers scribled on the backs of paneling in old houses that are demolished. None of this is surprising to historians but science types find it hard to believe that todays society is not as cutting edge as they imagine it is.


ANOTHER good point! Quality furniture used to have fancy joints that would be hard to do TODAY, and many of them didn't have ANY kind of automatic tools. TODAY, you would be hard pressed to find such quality. They also fit moulding that most today use plaster and plastic to merely emulate. And TODAY they take a LOT of shortcuts.

As to talking a person into writing a letter, would the person REALLY sit down with them, flesh out the letter, etc???? I DOUBT it! If they merely WROTE the letter, the lack of education would show in word choice and syntax.



2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

17 Mar 2009, 8:03 pm

Whimsi-Cal wrote:
nothingunusual wrote:
It's as if IQ scores were the Asperger's equivalent to penis (or breast) size. :roll:


Because those with the small ones are the people most offended. :lol:


Don't forget the 2' penis I spoke of! ALSO, I prefer breasts smaller than D. There comes a point where it seems like it would be more a burden than anything else. I can't even IMAGINE a person that is C wanting augmentation surgery. It seems silly.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

17 Mar 2009, 8:16 pm

2ukenkerl wrote:
twoshots wrote:
Umm... how is any of that tirade relevant to my point? In fact, that graph was used to specifically address the topic of education deterioration. The IQ data, I have no need to justify any further because the case is closed as far as this thread is concerned: IQ has been going up. EOM


How come you haven't gone up with the tide then?

Do you have anything resembling an actual point? IQ may not be the best metric on earth, but that *doesn't* imply it's time for freestyle let's look at whatever we want, because that introduces a little thing called confirmation bias.

Toodles guys, I'm off to greener pastures.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


timeisdead
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 895
Location: Nowhere

17 Mar 2009, 8:53 pm

Intelligence can often be independent of educational attainment. My definition of intelligence is


1) The ability to learn at a fast pace
2) The ability to grasp complex subject matter
3) The ability to form conclusions and have foresight into the future
4) The ability to apply your knowledge
5) The ability to effectively problem solve
6) The ability to express oneself coherently
7) Creativity and ingenuity



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

18 Mar 2009, 12:17 am

2ukenkerl wrote:
twoshots wrote:
Inventor wrote:
IQ testing has also shown a creep over time, moving up 1% per decade. These 12 points are attributed to mental inflation, needed to keep the mean at 100. This is done by dropping the hard questions.

What the hell are you talking about? IQ tests have to be renormed every few years because IQ shows a tendency to increase known as the Flynn Effect, which is exhibit A of the environmental plasticity of IQ. People in the past would have had a much lower IQ using modern standards; one article estimated that 1930s era people would have had an average IQ in the neighborhood of 80 by the standards of the mid 1990s.

-twoshots, who, of course, has no idea what his IQ is but gestimates it to be within 3 standard deviations of 100*(Σ(1/2)^j + (lim (1+1/n)^n [as n->∞])^(i*π))


You're NUTS! It is more likely that the test WRITERS are getting dumber, so they are asking simpler questions!
BTW outside of SOME words and contemporary ideas, the abilities they test existed HUNDREDS of years ago.



1930=80
1850=60
1770=40

Columbus sailed the ocean blue, with an IQ of -22.

The Flynn Effect is best shown with three shells and a pea.

Post WWII the study shows children who were 20 points lower than would be predicted by their parents scores.

It was tracked to Tetra Ethel Lead in gas. Millions of tons had been spread through the highest density of population.

In 1972 lead was suddenly pulled from gas, paint, in a great government coverup.

IQ tests were reset to fit, text books dumbed down, but nothing was done about the lead plated world.

Those born between 1955 and 1975 got the worst of it, but it continued.

Stories about children who tested high for lead and low for IQ were refuted by saying they were dumb, and ate paint chips. Then testing was stopped.

Energy companies and government regulators did not know about the effects of lead on children under five? They were University grads with high IQ's.

Mass chelation might have worked, just washing down the cities, removing an inch of dirt from playgrounds, but they chose to re set IQ tests and dumb down education, for there is potential liability in poisoning a nation.

While for most it caused a severe decline in performance, for the autistic it brought an almost human level of intelligence, slowing down what ran too fast, and the only thing produced that worked was computers. Only those with a narrow focus and a special interest managed to produce.

It has also lead to the greatest rise of mindless Religion since the Black Death.

The export of jobs has not been just for economic reasons, but because the post WWII people fell below the performance of their parents. It went from factory workers who could design and build a better machine, to their children who could not run a machine.

Jobs any good worker could do in the past now took a Degree, Those were sold on the idea they should go in debt for $50,000 in Student Loans, Credit Cards at high interest, and buy homes with nothing down. Their parents would have seen it for the scam and debt servitude it is. 1/3 for tax, 1/3 for interest, and live on the last 1/3.

When the banks and insurance companies are shown to be running massive frauds, the answer is not, put them in jail, but put more debt on the people to make the losses good.

General intelligence is declining, education, and general knowledge, for we lost a lot when we lost several generations of the teachers who had been keeping knowledge moving from generation to generation.

I find way too many being told they are at the leading edge of the Bell Curve of intelligence.

In performance in the real world I would say a 30% decline since WWII. It is also the period of the rise of Psychology to explain and drug what are the known symptoms of lead poisoning. ADD ADAD, and a slew of new cases labeled autism who do not fit the classic symptoms.

The effects of lead on developing humans under five, a lack of nural connections. They can still be good at one thing, they just lose out on the broader general views. The big picture. They have sparse neurons.

The autist problem is an excess density of neurons, so the same reduction caused by lead would improve performance.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

18 Mar 2009, 12:26 am

Inventor wrote:
2ukenkerl wrote:
twoshots wrote:
Inventor wrote:
IQ testing has also shown a creep over time, moving up 1% per decade. These 12 points are attributed to mental inflation, needed to keep the mean at 100. This is done by dropping the hard questions.

What the hell are you talking about? IQ tests have to be renormed every few years because IQ shows a tendency to increase known as the Flynn Effect, which is exhibit A of the environmental plasticity of IQ. People in the past would have had a much lower IQ using modern standards; one article estimated that 1930s era people would have had an average IQ in the neighborhood of 80 by the standards of the mid 1990s.

-twoshots, who, of course, has no idea what his IQ is but gestimates it to be within 3 standard deviations of 100*(Σ(1/2)^j + (lim (1+1/n)^n [as n->∞])^(i*π))


You're NUTS! It is more likely that the test WRITERS are getting dumber, so they are asking simpler questions!
BTW outside of SOME words and contemporary ideas, the abilities they test existed HUNDREDS of years ago.



1930=80
1850=60
1770=40

Columbus sailed the ocean blue, with an IQ of -22.

The Flynn Effect is best shown with three shells and a pea.

That's likewise comical if you think you're making an actual point. It's like saying that population couldn't be increasing exponentially because if you extend the trend ad infinitum you get ludicrous results.
Quote:
Post WWII the study shows children who were 20 points lower than would be predicted by their parents scores.

I'm frankly not even sure what that means, as a child's IQ score is distributed normally around an IQ which will generally be between the parent's IQ score and the mean IQ, so to a degree of probability any IQ is possible.

Quote:
In 1972 lead was suddenly pulled from gas, paint, in a great government coverup.

IQ tests were reset to fit, text books dumbed down, but nothing was done about the lead plated world.

Evidence, please? :roll:


_________________
* here for the nachos.


zen_mistress
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,033

18 Mar 2009, 2:46 am

timeisdead wrote:
Intelligence can often be independent of educational attainment. My definition of intelligence is


1) The ability to learn at a fast pace
2) The ability to grasp complex subject matter
3) The ability to form conclusions and have foresight into the future
4) The ability to apply your knowledge
5) The ability to effectively problem solve
6) The ability to express oneself coherently
7) Creativity and ingenuity


That is a great thought. There are so many different types of intelligence. IQ tests only test a few types and then label the people who dont get an above average score "dumb".

Also it measures certain types of intelligence, namely talent with all that is linear, procedural, formulaic, and quantitative. That is not all there is to nature, or the world!