MrLoony wrote:
I took that test about 2 months ago and got a 40. Today it was a 36. I think it's because of how I was considering the questions. Two months ago, I most assuredly answered that I am not a good diplomat. But what makes a good diplomat? If I spend time preparing and analyzing how whoever I'm supposed to be a diplomat to will react, I can easily convince them. Then again, maybe I'm being generous in that regard. I tend to make preparations for debating, not diplomacy.
I felt that the test didn't work in two ways:
1. Far too many are yes or no questions. How can you slightly agree or strongly agree with a yes or no question? Perhaps a range would work better and better wording.
2. One point or zero. It doesn't matter how true it is for you. That doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Still, it's not terrible. I just think that it needs to be improved a bit. Self-tests never seem to be all that good.
I actually found out that whether you say slightly or strongly doesn't matter. It's whether you say agree or disagree for particular questions that matters.
I found out that the peer-review studies say the AQ test is pretty accurate, although a proper diagnosis is the only way to go. I found some of the studies at the bottom of the Autism Research Centre page
http://www.autismresearchcentre.com/tests/aq_test.asp