daspie wrote:
This is my point. NTs intuitively know in real time that whatever is said can potentially be a lie.
I just said I know in real time that whatever is said can potentially be a lie. I pointed out an example in which I realized in real time that someone was lying, and I pointed out that even when I cannot process a situation fast enough to identify lies specifically, I am still aware that what I am hearing are potential lies.
Quote:
You misinterpret that because there truth was said in a concealed manner and one had to know pretense to understand the meaning. By pretense I meant the general act of meaning something else. The tea thing was not deception but pretense since she meant whole refreshment by "tea".
This has nothing to do with knowing pretense, it has to do with missing nuance and multiple meanings.
Quote:
My answer to it is same as one of the above. In practice surely we might be having better understanding because of drill but when it comes to theory I still think we have a age of a toddler. When a toddler cries or screams it knows that its mother knows that it is crying. But we do not have that kind of understanding even as an adult.
You dodged my question:
Is a difference that makes no difference, actually a difference? You seem to be splitting hairs so that the process is only relevant if it's done the same way NTs do it, and ignoring the fact that it can be done.
Quote:
Since I have been saying that we have an age of a toddler, few weeks ago I experimented with a kid. I asked his father about his(kid!) age and he told me that he was 3 years old which means he was between 3 and 4. He was holding a packet of biscuits in one of his hands which was not contiguous to me. I said to him"I want to eat biscuits, I want to eat biscuits". He moved his hand away from me in which he was, of course, holding the biscuits.
How did he know that I was mentioning his biscuits. Because he knew that if he can see the biscuits then other can also.
Okay? I do not see how this relates. I am aware that if I can see something, others can as well.
Quote:
Richard Feynman whom I believe had aspergers wrote this in his nobel lecture.
Quote:
Europeans are much more serious than we are in America because they think that a good place to discuss intellectual matters is a beer party. So, he sat by me and asked, "what are you doing" and so on, and I said, "I'm drinking beer." Then I realized that he wanted to know what work I was doing and I told him I was struggling with this problem, and I simply turned to him and said, "listen, do you know any way of doing quantum mechanics, starting with action
Feynman could not realize this. Now you realize what I meant
.
Here is the
link to the full nobel lecture.
No, I see his immediate reaction is a literal response, but then he realized what he was actually being asked. I do this a lot myself, but this is not "could not realize this." This is "delayed realization," but is still in real time as it happens during the conversation.
And again, that it may not happen in real time is not due to social immaturity, but cognitive processing.
Also,
selection bias.