Page 6 of 16 [ 256 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 16  Next

Gideon
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

28 Mar 2011, 12:03 pm

yeah being treated like a second class citizen your entire life because you think differently than everyone else makes comparing it to the plight of blacks a cop out. You might as well put on a white hood and robe and go burn a cross in my yard.


I actually bet if we looked at psychological problems of African Americans in the deep South during and after the civil rights movement we would find similar rates of depression and mental disorders at are presently seen in aspergers populations.



Last edited by Gideon on 28 Mar 2011, 12:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Gideon
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

28 Mar 2011, 12:05 pm

draelynn wrote:
Gideon wrote:
To catch their attention the first thing that needs to be done is that people with aspergers need to stop referring to themselves as disabled. How do you convince an NT that you aren't some mentally disturbed anti-social monster when other people who share aspergers with keep telling the NTs that we need to be treated as less than normal.

Second thing that needs to be done is to focus on the many Aspergers' successful lives rather than the failures and to quit setting up other aspies to fail. I am new to this community but in the short time I have been here what I have seen appalls me.

Imagine that during the civil rights movement large numbers of African Americans sided with the racists and stated that blacks were inferior to whites. That is exactly what these people on this thread and this site for that matter are doing when they try to convince people with aspergers that they are somehow disabled.

Damn right Pokey that pisses me off.


'Disabled' - as a word - does nothing to hold people back. It merely distinguishes the 'norm' from those not the 'norm'. In and of itself it does not pass judgement. Other people ascribing stereotypes to the word are the problem. If the community had another word that described their difficulties in a manner that did not discount them nor engender bias against them while also classifying them as an individual that does need assistance to get by in life, I think it would be a welcomed change.

I think this community does a wonderful job encouraging others to improve and better themselves where applicable BUT, it is first and foremost a support community. A refuge for those who have no place else to turn, no one who understands or listens. Yes, there are alot of sympathic ears here and there are alot of people coming here being heard for the first time in their life. Without support, no one can move forward and better themselves. This site is just a single step on that journey - it cannot be the big brother, family friend or mentor that helps an individual physically take the next step. It can provide encouragement and a sense of community. Expecting a website to provide more than that might be expecting too much.


i don't have a problem with seeking support i have a problem with people pushing the idea that aspergers is basically a disease, something that needs to be fixed or wiped out. That is what these people are pedaling they hate themselves so much they want to be just like the NTs and it shows.



Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 69,542
Location: Over there

28 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm

Gideon wrote:
yeah being treated like a second class citizen your entire life because you think differently than everyone else makes comparing it to the plight of blacks a cop out.
It was a cop-out because you completely ignored the question being asked.


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


Poke
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 605

28 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm

Gideon, do you understand the fact that there is "disability" in NT's doesn't mean that there is no correlation between "disability" and Asperger's?

For example, there are people who aren't autistic who do have "face blindness". Does this mean that there's absolutely no correlation between "face blindness" and autism? Of course not.

In other words, there are people who don't live in NY that are Yankees fans. Does this mean that there's absolutely no correlation between "being a Yankees fan" and living in NY? Of course not.



Gideon
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

28 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm

Poke wrote:
Gideon, do you understand the fact that there is "disability" in NT's doesn't mean that there is no correlation between "disability" and Asperger's?

For example, there are people who aren't autistic who do have "face blindness". Does this mean that there's absolutely no correlation between "face blindness" and autism? Of course not.

In other words, there are people who don't live in NY that are Yankees fans. Does this mean that there's absolutely no correlation between "being a Yankees fan" and living in NY? Of course not.


You do realize that because there is disability in the aspergers population doesn't mean that there is a coorelation between "disability" and aspergers.

Works both ways pokey.



Poke
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 605

28 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm

Gideon wrote:
You do realize that because there is disability in aspergers population doesn't mean that there is a coorelation between "disability" and aspergers.


No, it's the great (and well-documented) prevalence of "disability" in Asperger's that warrants the recognition of that correlation. Asperger's is partly defined in terms of disability.

Your concept of Asperger's is extremely narrow and self-serving.



huntedman
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 467

28 Mar 2011, 12:27 pm

"The {lady} doth protest too much, methinks"



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

28 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm

I do not think that the fact that ASDs are disabilities means they are diseases and need to be wiped out. I have already explained why I am against a cure in other posts. I do not think that people with disabilities are broken and have tried to argue against that in other contexts.

The fact that many NTs are disabled too is not really relevant. Many people diagnosed with AS have those disabilities as well. I'm not sure what the label is for this kind of fallacy, but the problem here is assuming that there is some kind of necessary division between people who have AS and people who have other kinds of disabilities, even though they're all disabilities and there is a lot of overlap.

As Poke pointed out, AS actually causes disability. One person's experience of being autistic is not definitive. If you've met one autistic person, you've met one autistic person. People on the spectrum (whatever they're diagnosed with) are all over the place in terms of ability and disability, and it's impossible to judge what others are like based on one person's experiences.

And there's this:

http://cometscorner-clay.blogspot.com/2 ... -jobs.html

I don't think Chelsea was working from a position of believing she is "too broken" to work. I think she was quite the opposite, but ran into significant resistance just trying to find a job. That part of her story is extremely familiar to me, given how many years I spent applying for jobs, getting interviews, and never getting called back.

And I mean, yes, I am paid by the state for having AS. I'll admit that right here and now - $197/month that I can spend on my needs - but that's state assistance, and Federal will be somewhat better. I've pushed myself to the point of burnout trying to succeed in the neurotypical working world - even managing some limited success via freelance work - and the only thing that happens is I crash and burn and lose the work in the end. So after having spent years trying and failing to make any progress I'm going with SSI. SSI, btw, sucks. You can't have more than $2000 in assets. If you get a job, you can easily make too much money and lose your benefits. It's not a gravy train, it's mandatory poverty. You'll get around $650/month at most, which is pretty minimal for anything (I have lived on $500 and $600 a month, and it's barely enough to survive on, even with cheap rent).



Gideon
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

28 Mar 2011, 12:49 pm

As doesn't cause disability the interaction with an NT world causes all those things currently seen as disabilities.



Poke
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 605

28 Mar 2011, 12:58 pm

Gideon wrote:
As doesn't cause disability the interaction with an NT world causes all those things currently seen as disabilities.


Number one, AS doesn't "cause" disability, it's a name for disability. It is , in large part, a disability.

Number two, from what philosophically convoluted point of view is the inability to socialize not a "disability"?



ZeroGravitas
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 499
Location: 40,075 kilometers from where I am

Gideon
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

28 Mar 2011, 1:05 pm

Poke wrote:
Gideon wrote:
As doesn't cause disability the interaction with an NT world causes all those things currently seen as disabilities.


Number one, AS doesn't "cause" disability, it's a name for disability. It is , in large part, a disability.

Number two, from what philosophically convoluted point of view is the inability to socialize not a "disability"?


No what AS is is a name for a state of perceptual awareness and characteristics related to that difference in perception. People with As don't have an inability to socialize but they do socialize differently than NTs. Because NTs are the majority they treat those with Aspergers as if their difference is a disorder. That treatment is at the root of most problems aspies have with their co-morbid conditions. So no aspergers is not a disability or even a disorder it is a different way of seeing the world not a lesser way or a broken way.


Maybe the way NTs socialize is actually the disorder.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

28 Mar 2011, 1:07 pm

Even assuming (incorrectly) that AS is only disabling because of the social model of disability:

We can't live in a world that functions otherwise. We're in a world that is primarily suited to NT needs. So... it's a disability.



draelynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,304
Location: SE Pennsylvania

28 Mar 2011, 1:09 pm

Gideon wrote:
i don't have a problem with seeking support i have a problem with people pushing the idea that aspergers is basically a disease, something that needs to be fixed or wiped out. That is what these people are pedaling they hate themselves so much they want to be just like the NTs and it shows.


I think that is an overly broad generalization. That is not the opinion of most people here. While there are many with more challenging degrees of autism, even they do not subscribe to the 'disease' theory. They may want a 'cure' or treatment to help alleviate their conditions but very few look at their 'disease' as a free ride. most peopel are extremely frustrated - not by their dysfunction but by societies intolerance of it. You can rename that or call that whatever you like but in general terms - people don't like the effect their autism has on their life. Even confident successful aspies still have struggles they wish they didn't have or things they want to improve on.

Most educated medical professionals will correct that statement immediately - Asperger's in not a 'disease', it's just a different brain wiring schematic. And no matter how you look at it, it's not always smooth sailing and frequently, its an all out hurricane in alot of lives.



Gideon
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

28 Mar 2011, 1:10 pm

ZeroGravitas wrote:


I can see a few evolutionary advantages to not being comfortable in your skin doesn't mean a thing. I am also very cold tolerant which is part of my aspergers and can walk around in short sleeves and shorts to about the freezing point without getting uncomfortable my NT friends can't do that. Doesn't mean they are disabled because they are so intolerant to the cold. It means we are different. I can complain about the differences without being disabled.

Btw if you would like to know the evolutionary advantages to clumsiness I can list them. If you are interested.



ZeroGravitas
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 499
Location: 40,075 kilometers from where I am

28 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm

Actually, I would be very interested to hear of an evolutionary advantage to clumsiness.


_________________
This sentance contains three erors.

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt156929.html - How to annoy me