aghogday wrote:
It appears to me that the term "neurotypical" is often used as an allegory for Society. There is no neurotypical per neurology; never has been; never will be. That is not the way of nature.
Yes... And No... There is no medical definition for Neurotypical. BUT we use the word to apply to NORMAL people... and there is a definition in the dictionary for that.
Quote:
normal - adj.;
a : of, relating to, or characterized by average intelligence or development
b : free from mental disorder : sane
c : characterized by balanced well-integrated functioning of the organism as a whole
And it is the way of nature...in the wild, when dealing with social creatures, those that demonstrate deviant behaviors are either shunned or killed.... NTs, being the social creatures that they are... do the exact same thing... Unlike those that have the same neurological function, the shunned get it... and fall into line, making another baseline NORMAL person... Since we don't get the nuances of the social behaviors... we end up farther and farther out of the circles...
I think that is why we end up so angry, for the most part... at least a large part of it...
But, to a certain extent... Society = NT... because they run society
_________________
Yeah. I'm done. Don't bother messaging and expecting a response - i've left WP permanently.