Chain wrote:
Jesus Christ is most likely Aspergers with ADHD.
Some of the Apostles were NT's with a mix of sociopaths and NPD
Paul was most likely NPD
Jesus the Nazerene in all likelihood did not have Asperger's syndrome. Diagnosing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DSM-IV-TR) or a hyperkinetic disorder (ICD-10) on people known cursively from posthumous literature is irresponsible, especially when the time and culture were so very different. Many of the signs of ADHD come to clinical attention because of an environment peculiar to modern Western life. Psychopathy and narcissistic personality disorder, which overlap significantly, are tricky to pinpoint on people whose life has become the object of worship; evidence of actual life events is scarce. Also, in the DSM-IV-TR ICD-10, pervasive developmental disorders take precedence over attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or hyperkinetic disorders.Chain wrote:
In culture:
ADD and Asperger's are the types that keep things dynamic
Sociopaths (Bad term: they often are VERY social) are the structuralists
NPDers are the leaders that spread the word and expect obedience
NT's are the followers
In order for a religion to take off you need:
A Radical starter (ADHD and Asperger's is a VERY radical combo) (Jesus, James, Philip)
A Leader to carry the word (NPD) (Paul, Peter, John,)
A Structured person to design stricture (Matthew, Andrew, John)
and lots of followers (NT's)
IMHO
Many religions form from years of custom (e.g., ancestor worship and shamanism). Cults of personality and religions with set mores come from on high; that is, people with a set vision of how society should function and a sense of duty use their charisma and oratory skills to establish a new branch of religion. Founding and leading a religion, therefore, would take obsessive-compulsive, narcissistic, and antisocial personality traits, if not the full personality disorders, which may be detractive to followers. A psychopath or narcissist who starts a cult to satisfy his or her own vanity or to con people out of their possessions probably will not develop the a large and reasonable following needed to sustain and grow a religion. After all, more reasonable men and women would find a psychopath's spiritual advice rather hollow and ignore it. The possibility does exist, though, that other people will build a stronger theological framework on the charismatic psychopath or narcissist's inspiration.
Chain wrote:
P.S. If you want to see what NPD and Sociopaths look like...watch Televangelists
That is very much true! It's hard to comprehend that some people are so taken in by the words of televangelists.
By the way, the psychological constructs of psychopathy and narcissism overlap considerably. It seems the major difference between the two is that a psychopath has most likely committed a crime or acted with particular aggression whereas a narcissist has not necessarily done so. In both an unrealistically heightened sense of self-worth exists as do frequent use of deception to achieve one's own ends. Both are lackinng in empathy, but a narcissist may have some loyalty to a belief, cause, or person. A psychopath does not even have this. Psychopathy is probably just a more severe degree of narcissism.