Any new theories for Asperger cause?
P-We
Tufted Titmouse
Joined: 10 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 33
Location: In the hall with the lead piping
Just a few points to try and catch up with you guys;
1. It's great to see Mitch say "How can you be so sure that AS has (solely) granted you all these positive attributes and skills?" Amen to that - let's at least try and imagine ourselves as not defined by AS tendencies - can you imagine yourself as you, with all your strengtrhs, but also without this clunky great machine going in your head that makes our socialising so difficult?
2. I think the brain white cells and other brain differences are largely a result of how AS tendency people use their brain - work by Eric Courchesne of University of California, San Diego suggests most abnormal autism brain growth occurs between birth and age 3 (i.e. not before birth) (Science, June 2005). See my site for more.
NeantHumain thanks particularly for your thoughtful critique; points I'd make in response;
I agree the AS mind is "better adapted in some contexts (e.g., scientific inquiry, mathematics, logic, engineering, and acquisition of knowledge) while being relatively impaired in other contexts (e.g., unstructured socializing, spontaneous behavior, and improvising strategies for novel situations). " - I think we can have it all - retain our systemising skills for appropriate contexts, but turn it off, let it go, for social etc contexts where using subconscious empathetic and intuitive tools without doubt gives better results, joy, connection etc.
On the "strong heritable component to autism" I believe we may have brains genetically tilted toward AS, but that we can still turn the other way, use our empathy capabilities etc..
(My model here is a partially sighted man may still choose option A - partial sight and no white stick, over option B - a blindfold and a white stick. This is what I think the AS deal is; a deafening systemising system - white stick - which drowns out the empathy etc potential - partial sight. I'd rather have partial sight and maybe fall over once in while.)
On brain components yes I do believe AS and NT's do have the same brain components. The studies as I understand them (again see my site) show we have mirror neurons, we have just not used them.
If we opened up your head right now do you think we would find no mirror neurons? No! - you have them, you have them when you're walking around tomorrow - you have just never fired them up, because your brain has developed down the AS way.
On whether AS or NT approach gives better lives,
(a) I am quite open to you deciding you want to use AS all the time - I believe better to use AS when it's best to and NT when it's best to,
(b) since I have laid down AS tendency in socialising I have not noticed any change in my attitudes, drivers, systemising ability at work etc, etc.. I believe you'll still be as intelligent etc, and you can still be your scientist, philosopher, designer - but just having more fun as well.
Thanks again for your posts - further thoughts very welcome
Instead of telling everybody they should try to behave like a NT person, why don't you find a 'cure' to the sensory issues most people on the spectrum suffer from? That would actually be helpful... And I'm totally sure these issues don't have anything to do with how I use my brain.
I do believe your approach helped you in your personal situation, but you have to understand that not everybody's brain works the same, and that the approach you used might not work in the same way for another person.
Also, it's just wrong to reduce AS to the social problems some of us may experience. (And some don't!) There are still other symptoms of AS, and if you never experienced any of them, it's not even sure you ever had AS. There is still the possibility of NT people just not being very social. My main symptoms are hypersensitivity (textures and certain frequencies of light), and simply trying to use a different way of thinking WON'T make that go away. I'm never going to be NT, it's as simple as that... You can't just ignore the biological difference.
Last edited by Eller on 15 May 2007, 2:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Most of what you call impairments above are not impairments in the real sense put secondary problems. In the last Aspie-quiz, I had a question about enjoying unexpected happenings in nature. No big difference between Aspies and NTs. The difference gets much larger when I ask about unexpected people-oriented situations. IOW, this is not part of being Aspie but part of being Aspie when the majority is NT. I bet that NTs would be just as rigid and have problems in unstructured socializing, spontaneous behavior, and improvising. You are making the same mistake as everybody at Cure Autism Now / Autism Speaks do all the time. Confusing environmental / cultural behaviors with the innate differences in autism.
1. It's great to see Mitch say "How can you be so sure that AS has (solely) granted you all these positive attributes and skills?" Amen to that - let's at least try and imagine ourselves as not defined by AS tendencies - can you imagine yourself as you, with all your strengtrhs, but also without this clunky great machine going in your head that makes our socialising so difficult?
2. I think the brain white cells and other brain differences are largely a result of how AS tendency people use their brain - work by Eric Courchesne of University of California, San Diego suggests most abnormal autism brain growth occurs between birth and age 3 (i.e. not before birth) (Science, June 2005). See my site for more.
INTERESTING, you ask a question, and then ANSWER it! MANY scientists/researchers have backed up my theory, some have even stated it in almost as many words, that autism disables the use of part of the brain for its normal purpose, and it is reallocated elsewhere. That is due, in part, to the white matter reconnecting nuerons, and accounts for the differences apparent in that structure. Isn't it silly to ignore that? So MORE resources are allocated to a task, and it is done better/faster!
I agree the AS mind is "better adapted in some contexts (e.g., scientific inquiry, mathematics, logic, engineering, and acquisition of knowledge) while being relatively impaired in other contexts (e.g., unstructured socializing, spontaneous behavior, and improvising strategies for novel situations). " - I think we can have it all - retain our systemising skills for appropriate contexts, but turn it off, let it go, for social etc contexts where using subconscious empathetic and intuitive tools without doubt gives better results, joy, connection etc.
GEE, It seems people here can be spontaneous(they just PREFER routine), and can improvise(It is just best to do them the better way)
(My model here is a partially sighted man may still choose option A - partial sight and no white stick, over option B - a blindfold and a white stick. This is what I think the AS deal is; a deafening systemising system - white stick - which drowns out the empathy etc potential - partial sight. I'd rather have partial sight and maybe fall over once in while.)
On brain components yes I do believe AS and NT's do have the same brain components. The studies as I understand them (again see my site) show we have mirror neurons, we have just not used them.
If we opened up your head right now do you think we would find no mirror neurons? No! - you have them, you have them when you're walking around tomorrow - you have just never fired them up, because your brain has developed down the AS way.
On whether AS or NT approach gives better lives,
(a) I am quite open to you deciding you want to use AS all the time - I believe better to use AS when it's best to and NT when it's best to,
(b) since I have laid down AS tendency in socialising I have not noticed any change in my attitudes, drivers, systemising ability at work etc, etc.. I believe you'll still be as intelligent etc, and you can still be your scientist, philosopher, designer - but just having more fun as well.
Thanks again for your posts - further thoughts very welcome
Who said nobody here has empathy? And partially sighted people normally DO have some sight.
Steve
Steve
I'm asbsolutely with you when you say "that autism disables the use of part of the brain for its normal purpose, and it is reallocated elsewhere" - my question is how does it disable that part of the brain - I believe through this logic systemising going on in your head using that part of the brain that usually empathises etc..
The "Failure to deactivate" research papers by Kennedy, Redcay and Courchesne (http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articl ... id=1472462) and by Iacobini (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/quer ... med_docsum) looked at a part of the brain that was active when NT's socialised, but was not active when they were not socialising. In AS brains this area was active at both times.In my view this activity may well be systemising processes, being applied to all areas of life, and using up brain resources (cycles).
Eller
I think the sensory hypersensitivity (which I have in mild form) has developed because your brain has been seeking to capture and amplify every input (growing white matter to better insulate and keep these inputs), because it needs every fragment of data as it tries to navigate the world by logic and systemising.
Yes, AS is more than socialising. But I think all AS tendency effects (and probably autism too) come back to trying to relate to everything in life and the world through a logic, systemising approach. (Sometimes this is useful and good, sometimes not).
Thank you all everyone for engaging with me on this. I've added a 'Problems, Challenges etc' page to my site. Here's hoping some of you find a way out too if ever you want one. All the best
Not sure about that - the hypersensitivity didn't 'develop', I had it since birth. Little baby Eller just wouldn't stop screaming when someone put her onto the wrong bedsheets or tried to make her wear the wrong diapers or socks. And I doubt I was systemizing a lot at that age, I was busy drinking and sleeping and wetting my diapers and keeping my parents awake, just like everybody else... Actually, I don't systemize that much anyway. My father does a lot more systematic thinking, and he's NT. Not every Aspie has necessarily a problem with intuition, you know?
I'm asbsolutely with you when you say "that autism disables the use of part of the brain for its normal purpose, and it is reallocated elsewhere" - my question is how does it disable that part of the brain - I believe through this logic systemising going on in your head using that part of the brain that usually empathises etc..
The "Failure to deactivate" research papers by Kennedy, Redcay and Courchesne (http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articl ... id=1472462) and by Iacobini (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/quer ... med_docsum) looked at a part of the brain that was active when NT's socialised, but was not active when they were not socialising. In AS brains this area was active at both times.In my view this activity may well be systemising processes, being applied to all areas of life, and using up brain resources (cycles).
Eller
I think the sensory hypersensitivity (which I have in mild form) has developed because your brain has been seeking to capture and amplify every input (growing white matter to better insulate and keep these inputs), because it needs every fragment of data as it tries to navigate the world by logic and systemising.
Yes, AS is more than socialising. But I think all AS tendency effects (and probably autism too) come back to trying to relate to everything in life and the world through a logic, systemising approach. (Sometimes this is useful and good, sometimes not).
Thank you all everyone for engaging with me on this. I've added a 'Problems, Challenges etc' page to my site. Here's hoping some of you find a way out too if ever you want one. All the best
I think it's generally accepted that a lot of the problems associated with Asperger's, and especially Kanner's autism are a result of the sensory processing problems, rather than the cause of them.
P-We
Tufted Titmouse
Joined: 10 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 33
Location: In the hall with the lead piping
Good thread!
This has got me thinking. I have spent a lot of time (most of my 37 years) being completely out of kilter with my situation. With my increased awareness of AS in recent times it has become so much easier to recognise and negotiate my way around my own clunky great machine.
In a nutshell - I think I'm pretty happy with my lot for now - ie more on top of my situation than I have ever been and possibly ever will be. That said - if someone invents a pill which takes away all the pickly stuff but leaves the positive parts of my psyche pretty much intact, I'll go buy a big box.
Again, I have it easier than a lot, and probably have had it easier, even in the darkest days. Can only strive to be an expert on me, not AS in general. In that context I find it difficult to seperate the different parts of myself - if I was 'cured' of AS tomorrow, what would be left? I don't have an answer to that.
I regret that I've lost the thread (sorry, pun not intended).
I do not wish to offend, but can someone explain -
is it being advocated that we all have a lobotomy or some such so that the mischievous electrical signals in our wrongly wired brains would instead be sent the correct NT way and make us NT- compatible?
I believe that I simply have a different way of thinking (to the NTs) which has its own advantages and disadvantages, but I see nothing inherently wrong with that .
Michaelmas
One new idea (to me, anyway) is that many people who believe themselves to be Asperger are in fact being impacted by social mobility psychological problems; they are getting symptoms that result from difficulties in moving up/down between different social strata.
Another is that the increasing use of analysis and system thinking in our Western civilisation (computers, programming, making choices from many options, using TV controllers, more complex personal financial product options....) is causing our brains to be more analytical and systematic, triggering Asperger thinking.
Any more brave new ideas?
Seing as how there's a high incidence rates in identical twins (85% IIRC), I'm going to venture out to suggest that it's primarily hereditary.
With my increased awareness of AS in recent times it has become so much easier to recognise and negotiate my way around my own clunky great machine.
In a nutshell - I think I'm pretty happy with my lot for now - ie more on top of my situation than I have ever been and possibly ever will be. That said - if someone invents a pill which takes away all the pickly stuff but leaves the positive parts of my psyche pretty much intact, I'll go buy a big box. ;)
Again, I have it easier than a lot, and probably have had it easier, even in the darkest days. Can only strive to be an expert on me, not AS in general. In that context I find it difficult to seperate the different parts of myself - if I was 'cured' of AS tomorrow, what would be left? I don't have an answer to that.
CONGRATULATIONS P-We ON THIS HUGE STEP FORWARD IN YOUR SELF-CONCEPTION AND AWARENESS. You are way on down the road. Very best wishes, JC
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Trauma, Bad Parenting, and Autism: Theories About My Wife |
05 Oct 2024, 1:36 am |
Abused Because of Asperger's? |
22 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm |
Asperger Experts |
22 Nov 2024, 9:42 pm |
how can i handle my asperger boyfriend's anger? |
12 Nov 2024, 12:13 pm |