LKL wrote:
The state of Alaska makes a great deal of money off of oil leases. They don't want to have further drilling curtailed due to concern over endangered bears being disturbed (the leaders of the state of Alaska, you might recall, are all for drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, despite the effects that it would have on caribou), and they don't want to admit that global warming is a problem despite villages disappearing into the ocean in their own back yards because there's no longer sea ice to protect the shores from storms.
The state of Alaska, you might remember, also wants to allow the 'sport' of shooting wolves from airplanes as the wolves cross frozen lakes and are totally exposed, with nowhere to run or hide.
You obviously know nothing about ANWR. It wouldn't harm the caribou population in a noticable way. As a matter of fact, caribou populations have increased during past drilling operations.
Also, the ANWR drilling site/s wouldn't cover much surface area at all, as drilling technology is much more advanced. They can now drill in many directions from one spot, meaning they can take up much less space and get much more oil than they used to. So the ANWR site would be too small to really make much of a difference. That land is all tundra anyway, have you actually SEEN ANWR? There aren't Caribou every 2 feet. The land is so large the caribou would have no problem at all having an oil drilling operation with very little surface area in the same GIGANTIC area they live in.