League_Girl wrote:
Why don't people understand you can still be honest without being rude or mean? Why don't they also understand you can still tell people things they don't want to hear without being mean?
Why do people even think "honesty" entitles them to be a jerk or make fun of people or be bullies?
Just something I have noticed online and at Babycenter, the website had decided to enforce the rules in my birth club so they got more group owners for it and now people are complaining about "no freedom of speech" "can't express their honest opinions" and all these people who are complaining are bullies. Before the rules got enforced there, a few members got warnings or banned so they would go back and create a fake account and troll on their birth board making posts to create drama just to give the group owners a hard time because they were pissed they wouldnt let them be mean to other members. So the rules got enforced and more group owners came while two stepped down (the ones who were sending them warnings for their behavior and then they got banned from the Babycenter staff).
They are just pissed they aren't allowed to be jerks anymore without getting a warning nor banned. Funny stuff but also my pet peeve.
Honestly, these people who claim their freedom of speech are ignornant. Freedom of speech is enumerated in our bill of rights which are the first ten amendments to the US constitution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amen ... ution#Text
If we read that text literally as it says only congress could not take away freedom of speech. By what I have read and what I do understand of our constitution it has been expanded to mean and imply that only government(federal, local, state, or county) can't abridge or take away freedom of speech. Those site owners are in the right. It is their property and they're enforcing their rules with their own property. This is called property rights.
Think about Jimbeux's house and his computer. Jimbeux has a computer and it is his property that he bought with his own money. He bought the house with his own money as well. As a comparison it is similar to jimbeux's stepson having the right to use jimbeux's computer when he wishes without Jimbeux's permission. If Jimbeux's stepson had the right to use Jimbeux's computer when the stepson wished wouldn't this be violating Jimbeux's property rights. His stepson can't be entitled to this as a right and neither can these posters be entitled to this so called right of free speech(in this instance) they're demanding because these posters are violating the site owner's property rights by doing this. This is what Jimbeux was trying to explain to violet_yoshi. Jimbeux, if you see this will you please tell me if I am correct or incorrect?