Callista wrote:
And then there are the people who scored high on Machiavellianism--how did they come by those opinions, that tendency to manipulate social situations, to plan for their social futures? That seems to be very hard for the average autistic person, and yet they're doing it somehow.
It's one thing to have that general attitude and another to actually manage to carry Machiavellianism off properly. I agree entirely that autism makes the latter harder (at least without very intense long-lasting training for that specific purpose, if that).
I thought some of the questions that presumably had to do with Machiavellianism just seemed like common sense in this world of political animals. Like the one about avoiding unnecessary conflict because you might need allies later. But then, perhaps the fact that I consider that common sense supports the Machiavellian hypothesis.
I guess I didn't score that
that high, only 40th percentile, but to address your question... How did I come by those opinions? Watching schoolyard politics, influenced by my father, and probably by some works of fiction (though a popular example of such, Lord of the Flies, I couldn't bear to finish; never read the actual Machiavelli's works, though they're not really fiction, I guess?). I consider it a survival skill to try to plan for one's social future to some extent.