diagnosedafter50 wrote:
Dial1194 wrote:
Eh... hard to say. When I went through school, a lot of the 'gifted' programs were very crude things. I got into a couple based (presumably) on good grades, and did well (if not spectacularly) enough to be part of the wallpaper. From what I gathered - hampered somewhat by my lack of networking - they were marginally less boring than the regular academic streams. I don't think we ever got taught any additional subjects; presumably it was just faster or more in-depth.
In my personal life, I didn't have any particularly intellectual or academic hobbies, other than being hyperlexic. For a while, I was the neighborhood go-to kid for configuring or un-screwing anything electronic, but it's not like I had a soldering iron and a knowledge of circuits.
Other stuff? I dunno. I wrote memory-optimization configuration files for the family PC in the mid-80s so it was capable of running some of the games of the time. Wired up an extended parallel-port cable and rigged up a home network that ran through the ceiling. Nothing exactly groundbreaking.
Were the books you read fiction, that helps problem solving skills?
"
Quite a lot of fiction, yes. Mostly SF where I could get hold of it, some fantasy, some fairy tales, Enid Blyton-type stuff, and a bunch of reference works (mostly to do with language, but also encyclopedias etc). I'd also read the newspaper, manuals for everything, and anything else I could get my hands on, as the internet of the time was something that universities had but hardly anyone else did. Surprisingly, I read little in the way of classic literature, even though there was quite a lot of it in the house. Possibly because it was heavy going at that age, even for me.