Are Aspies Superior?: A multi-faceted discussion

Page 7 of 8 [ 118 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

01 Aug 2008, 9:15 pm

FreedomG wrote:
I should say the same thing about you.

I've just been answering questions.


Stercus taurii.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


Ann-D-Rew
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 31

01 Aug 2008, 9:19 pm

FreedomG wrote:
I never chose them, someone else did.


Even if someone else chose the type of chains you used, you still were the one to put them on your own arms.

You can choose to take them off too.

It's easy, can you choose to not be held down when someone says your an Aspie??

It's there opinion anyway, you know the truth. You know why you hold onto those chains.



JWRed
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 301
Location: Malibu, California

01 Aug 2008, 9:51 pm

Anyone who believes that people with AS are superior is delusional.

People believe what they need to believe in order to feel good about themselves. People with AS are no differrent.

I have never come across a bigger group of delusional people than the ones on this board.



sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

01 Aug 2008, 10:06 pm

JWRed wrote:
Anyone who believes that people with AS are superior is delusional.

People believe what they need to believe in order to feel good about themselves. People with AS are no differrent.

I have never come across a bigger group of delusional people than the ones on this board.


are you sure it is not just your delusion about this board that makes you say that?


_________________
Alis volat propriis
State Motto of Oregon


Malsane
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 216
Location: Iowa, USA

01 Aug 2008, 10:11 pm

Personally, I think labeling anything as superior or inferior is to oversimplify the situation. Let's look at a hummingbird. It is very well adapted to it's niche. But it is terrible at grabbing a mouse out of the field in flight in the dead of night. Owls are much better at that. Is either superior to the other? No, they have different characteristics. There are so many characteristics that compose any given individual that it is really impossible to numerically judge anything to be unilaterally better than any other thing. If we narrow the criteria, we could judge. Who is better at swimming, Lucy or Sally? We can measure who does the front crawl up and down the pool faster. But that is not the same as being superior. That means that Lucy is better at swimming the front crawl fast than Sally. Sally is likely better at something else.

So really, I think this whole idea that Aspies or Neurotypicals are superior to the other is silly. Personally, I do wonder if Aspies are a new branch of evolution. Now, there's this idea that evolution is always going forward, as if it were going toward something. It is not. Evolution is not a path of improvement. Humans are not 'better' than other species, just adapted to a different niche than others. Granted, we're a very generalist species, but we have our niche. I think Aspies may be filling a niche in human society. I wonder if perhaps we're becoming a subspecies, sub not meaning inferior, but obviously we're not an entirely new species. I think Aspies may be able to fill a niche in human civilization. We have our strengths and weaknesses, but they are a bit different from Neurotypicals' abilities. I'm sure that I'll be misunderstood here, but I think I'll leave it at that for now, let you ask questions if you care to.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

02 Aug 2008, 1:26 am

FreedomG maybe you are an Aspie who was picked apart by the more intellectually gifted Aspies and became bitter and troll-like?Since autism is on a spectrum there are so many different levels of existing and so many different modes of expressing intellect.

True, some on the spectrum have unusual talents others say are superior. I was told I had an above average intelligence at the age of four, after I took several tests at the University of Oklahoma. ( at the age of four I was already taking tests in college that must mean I am a genius, truly) I had to do this just to get into a regular kindergarten class. Most do not have to go through all that just to get into kindergarten. I even had to take another test at the place I was to attend kindergarten. I performed exceptionally awful on this test and was almost denied access to regular kindergarten because of it. My mother to the rescue, par usual. She managed to convince whomever it was administering the test that I was just goofing off and was really brilliant when I chose to be. This worked and I was allowed in.

I still have no idea if this was a blessing or a curse disguised as one. Being accepted into the regular classes lead to constant confrontations, isolation and being picked to death by other kids.

This was my first of many life tests. Over and over again I have had to prove myself just for the priveledge of mixing with the so-called normal ones.

I don't know. You tell me. What does all this make me? Does it make me superior? Better? Stronger? I think these bitter experiences have made me wiser especially in that "streetsmart" kind of way. But superior? I cannot answer that. I do feel better than most because of the experience. I just wish it were easier to convince the narrow minded presumptuous idiots around here of that!



Last edited by ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo on 02 Aug 2008, 1:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Bunni
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 321
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

02 Aug 2008, 1:28 am

Hiya, just dropped by to interject some personal knowledge..my dad has Aspergers, he is an inventor, he holds several patents. I just stopped by to share that.

Aside from that, I think the people who are superior are the ones that communicate effectively (no matter how they do it) or the ones that listen carefully to those who can't, presume intelligence of the other party, and make great effort to understand others and their differences.

Life would be rather dull if we were all the same? People with AS are all different just like NT people are all different.

anyone want a cookie? :)


_________________
Bunni

That which doesn't kill me, makes me stronger, and really pisses me off.


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

02 Aug 2008, 1:44 am

FreedomG wrote:
I never chose them, someone else did. but I realize that shackles are just chains that grow rusty like any other metal, they corrode over time until the point where I am free. But others choose to remain in their shackles, a crowded dungeon is better than a lonely one I guess.



Don't forget it can take fifteen years or longer for a pair of exceptionally thick steel shackles to rust enough for you to break free of them.



2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

02 Aug 2008, 10:33 am

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
FreedomG wrote:
I never chose them, someone else did. but I realize that shackles are just chains that grow rusty like any other metal, they corrode over time until the point where I am free. But others choose to remain in their shackles, a crowded dungeon is better than a lonely one I guess.



Don't forget it can take fifteen years or longer for a pair of exceptionally thick steel shackles to rust enough for you to break free of them.


AH, but add another metal or two, and they could seem to take FOREVER! :lol: A dry climate with little humidity will prolong things ALSO! 8O I have some steel taps I have had for about 30 years with NO rust, etc... :wink:



CoachMcGuirk
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 28
Location: Cupertino, CA

02 Aug 2008, 5:16 pm

No stake to break them, huh?

Or was the stake offered to you but you turned it down?



sim
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 512
Location: an uneven circle

02 Aug 2008, 5:17 pm

CoachMcGuirk wrote:
No stake to break them, huh?

Or was the stake offered to you but you turned it down?


Coach McGuirk, I'm a huge fan of your coaching techniques.



CoachMcGuirk
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 28
Location: Cupertino, CA

02 Aug 2008, 5:23 pm

Yeah, I win all my games as a result of them.



alba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 756

03 Aug 2008, 9:30 am

The prevalent opinion out there seems to be that people on the autism spectrum at the high functioning end, are neither superior nor inferior to NTs. But maybe the question is too broad. Isn't it obvious from all the discussion that NTs excell at certain things and autistics excell at other things? We need to look at specific skills....[and we need to be asking another very important question].

Let's look at social skills. We can make some conclusions within this one variable. There's little dispute that NTs are better at social skills. Social interaction usually gives them both confidence and happiness. Aspies, for whom social interaction is quite painful, may still find dozens of reasons to be happy. But on the social skills yardstick, NTs are superior.

Looking at the happiness parameter, NTs and Aspies being different but equal is a logical conclusion.

Let's look at the invention variable. Aspies in general have more time for invention due to the fact that they spend less time socially. Thinking about doing things in new and more efficient ways is probably more interesting to Aspies than to NTs. On the invention yardstick, Aspies are probably superior. But can we also conclde that Aspies are more creative [a larger category] than NTs? This requires further and more specific discussion.

To say we are equal or different or that we are just different isn't very useful to me. It's more useful to say in which areas NTs and Aspies are superior/inferior.

The reason this discussion is extremely significant is that NTs and Aspies can learn to respect each others' strengths. And that is a huge step forward from seeing the autism spectrum as only a hindrance to 'proper functioning'. The reality is that everyone who is making their best contribution is valuable and needed. Every one of us is remarkable in our own way. NTs who don't feel they are remarkable can be encouraged to do so. Aspies may need similar encouragement to communicate their strengths to the world at large.

How then can we help everyone to make their best contribution? This is the question that needs to be asked. And answered.



Sora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,906
Location: Europe

03 Aug 2008, 1:56 pm

FreedomG wrote:
Fine if I'm stupid, then you're the biggest ret*d here.


You do know that ret*d is an incredibly insulting term used like you did? Taking in the wide range of your insulting vocabulary you use, you do know. Do you have such a low opinion, taken from how you use this word, that equates people who score below 70-80 on a standardised IQ test and with a certain amount of self-help skill problems to something inferior that you think it can be used as an insult?

Why are you asking for opinions on the topic of superiority if you at the same time act as if you're superior to certain other groups of people?

Currently that is not exactly adding to that anybody takes you seriously. Small children already get taught that insulting and degrading behaviour towards others is extremely inappropriate as it shows no tolerance and an irrational and dangerous inclination towards lashing out at others in order to win.

So I wonder how why you think it's acceptable to behave like a big jerk that knows how to insult others in each and every sentence. Even your AS is no excuse for this sort of behaviour, especially if your debating superiority and inappropriateness of other people.


_________________
Autism + ADHD
______
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett


Hodor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 907
Location: England

03 Aug 2008, 5:47 pm

Smackerlacker wrote:
As for being religious... just exactly who isn't? Aside from the maybe 1% of the world population that's athiest?


Source?

Smackerlacker wrote:
And as far as evolution is concerned, your summation is basically correct. But here's the real question. If all the species are in a constant state of flux, then why is it that everyone and everything is so much the same? I've never seen a plant with eyeballs, or any animal with vocal chords.


Argument out of ignorance.

Evolution is not a quick process, don't assume that just because your knowledge of it is very scant that it is not true. Indeed, who has seen a plant with eyeballs, or an animal with vocal cords? Would they even need them? If plants somehow, against all logic, began to develop vision, they wouldn't just sprout eyes overnight. That's not how evolution works. So please, enough of the ridiculous comments. Not that this thread is exactly the pinnacle of human intelligence and reasoning to begin with. :?


_________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig."


natesmom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 631

03 Aug 2008, 6:30 pm

alba wrote:
But maybe the question is too broad. Isn't it obvious from all the discussion that NTs excell at certain things and autistics excell at other things? We need to look at specific skills....[and we need to be asking another very important question].

There's little dispute that NTs are better at social skills. on the social skills yardstick, NTs are superior.

Aspies in general have more time for invention due to the fact that they spend less time socially. Thinking about doing things in new and more efficient ways is probably more interesting to Aspies than to NTs. On the invention yardstick, Aspies are probably superior. But can we also conclde that Aspies are more creative [a larger category] than NTs? This requires further and more specific discussion.

NTs and Aspies can learn to respect each others' strengths. And that is a huge step forward from seeing the autism spectrum as only a hindrance to 'proper functioning'. The reality is that everyone who is making their best contribution is valuable and needed. Every one of us is remarkable in our own way.

How then can we help everyone to make their best contribution? This is the question that needs to be asked. And answered.


Well said! I as still teaching my husband social skills. Now we are working on nodding when someone is talking about something he feels is stupid and thinking of something to say like a question related to the topic. His eye contact has really improved.
Husband helps me with grammar, vocab and putting things together. I must say my 5 year old helps me more with fixing things and there is no doubt he is gifted and on the spectrum. We find out in two weeks if he is AS or HFA. My son has already invented little things. If I can't figure something out, I can go to him and he has at least two ideas. I also help him with social skills.