Are there any percentage or number statistic on ASD?

Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 

zeldapsychology
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,431
Location: Florida

20 Aug 2009, 6:43 am

As the title says is there data on 1 out of X or Y percent are on the spectrum (not just AS but the whole spectrum.) :-) Just curious. :-)



ChangelingGirl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,640
Location: Netherlands

20 Aug 2009, 7:42 am

Yes, but estimates vary considerably. I think the last CDC estimate was 1 in 150.



oppositedirection
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 515

21 Aug 2009, 11:56 am

I hear one in every hundred but then I used to hear one in every three hundred. I guess more people got diagnosed but given that maybe it'll go down to one in every fifty.



bhetti
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 May 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 874

21 Aug 2009, 12:27 pm

I think it's pretty strange that people think autism is "epidemic".

historical numbers don't change when an adult is dx'd, right? so add one for me for this year, but it actually should be added to historical numbers back in the 60s, since that's when I was born.

the autism "epidemic" is really an epidemic of diagnoses of previously undetected cases. if the data were corrected for year of birth, then the increase would be seen for what it is, more efficient diagnosis. I don't believe there was only one case per 10,000 back in the 80s or whenever. there was only ONE DETECTED case because no one knew what they were looking for.

sorry, I just got done reading the Larry King article from earlier this year. god that man is stupid. I hate sensationalism and misrepresentation of facts.



zeldapsychology
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,431
Location: Florida

21 Aug 2009, 1:40 pm

bhetti wrote:
I think it's pretty strange that people think autism is "epidemic".

historical numbers don't change when an adult is dx'd, right? so add one for me for this year, but it actually should be added to historical numbers back in the 60s, since that's when I was born.

the autism "epidemic" is really an epidemic of diagnoses of previously undetected cases. if the data were corrected for year of birth, then the increase would be seen for what it is, more efficient diagnosis. I don't believe there was only one case per 10,000 back in the 80s or whenever. there was only ONE DETECTED case because no one knew what they were looking for.

sorry, I just got done reading the Larry King article from earlier this year. god that man is stupid. I hate sensationalism and misrepresentation of facts.



I agree 100% with what you just said! LOL! I'm curious if it's literal LOL! (example 1/100 I take 100 people and ask if they are on the spectrum and see if ONE of them answers yes LOL!) My Psychology teacher said 1 out of 4 people have a Mental Illness which is what got my to thinking of people on the Spectrum. :-)



21 Aug 2009, 3:15 pm

Every 100th person I see, I probably saw one autistic person. If I go on a full bus, half of them have a mental illness. If I go to an aspie gathering and there are 15 people there, one of them is probably a savant since 1 in 10 autistics are savants. I have doubts the numbers are accurate.



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

21 Aug 2009, 8:00 pm

Savant syndrome doesn't have to be flashy. Remember the definition they are using for the 1:10 is "an advanced skill acquired with little practice". Lots of things qualify for that; you don't have to be some kind of stereotypical caledar-calculating, matchstick-counting Rainman.

You can't tell mental illness just by looking, most of the time. People get so good at hiding it that their co-workers for ten years don't know they have one...


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


glider18
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: USA

21 Aug 2009, 8:40 pm

Callista wrote:
Savant syndrome doesn't have to be flashy. Remember the definition they are using for the 1:10 is "an advanced skill acquired with little practice". Lots of things qualify for that; you don't have to be some kind of stereotypical caledar-calculating, matchstick-counting Rainman....


Thank you Callista for this way of saying this about savants---I am a talented autistic savant (music), and I find it difficult to explain it so that lay people can understand it. I don't even bring it up in my music ministry where I play several instruments and discuss autism in my life (though I may discuss it in the future). I get tired of when I do say "savant," people assume I am trying to compare myself to this Rainman. I try to explain I am not like that---I am a talented savant---1 in 10 autistics are savants. Only 50-100 are of the type of savant like Rainman was portrayed as.


_________________
"My journey has just begun."


21 Aug 2009, 9:37 pm

I was not talking about Rain Man when I mentioned "Savant." I know there are different savant abilities and it's not just math and numbers.

I was talking about statistics. It is now 1 in 100 now I saw at Autism Speaks and I've read every 1 in 10 autistics are savants and my friend here says 1 in 4 have a mental illness. So if I go to an aspie gathering, there might be at least one autistic savant there. It doesn't have to be numbers or math. It can be anything like art or music or memory or with geography.



bhetti
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 May 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 874

21 Aug 2009, 10:19 pm

I think my b-i-l is a musical savant. he can play a song after hearing it once, apparently.