Page 1 of 2 [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Inefficiency- Is is a Pet Peeve?
Yes 76%  76%  [ 22 ]
No 24%  24%  [ 7 ]
Total votes : 29

Rocky
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,074
Location: Uhhh...Not Remulak

21 Oct 2009, 8:24 pm

My father was an Engineer and a self appointed efficiency expert. Inefficiency has become a pet peeve of mine as well. Anyone else? I suspect that this is common among those on the spectrum.

(This replaces the other poll which was poorly worded.)

I am not sure the poll feature worked this time. If need be just vote in your post. Thanks.


_________________
"Reality is not made of if. Reality is made of is."
-Author prefers to be anonymous.


machf
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2007
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 324
Location: Lima, Peru

21 Oct 2009, 9:06 pm

Inefficiency, lack of any method and order... ugh, that pisses me off. And dealing with that on a project I'm involved in right now...



Obres
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,423
Location: NYC

21 Oct 2009, 11:37 pm

Yes! Oh my god yes, like nothing else



OverlyIntense
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 47

22 Oct 2009, 1:13 am

I've gotten better about this. Seems to me now, that efficiency is boring for workers. I mean at some point things become so efficient that you feel like a robot, and in fact could probably be replaced by one.

Plus when I was younger, change was easier. It takes more effort as we get older. Things are also changing faster and faster.



wigglyspider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,306
Location: WA, USA

22 Oct 2009, 3:07 am

For me it's kind of, like.. the other side. Like, I'm really obsessed with efficiency and becoming more efficient, but inefficiency doesn't really annoy me. I assume no responsibility over other people's level of efficiency, so I just enjoy watching.


_________________
"You gotta keep making decisions, even if they're wrong decisions, you know. If you don't make decisions, you're stuffed."
- Joe Simpson


Last edited by wigglyspider on 22 Oct 2009, 3:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

hush6
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 140

22 Oct 2009, 3:23 am

Productivity is very important to me.



Woodpeace
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 474
Location: Lancashire, England

22 Oct 2009, 3:44 am

Inefficiency doesn't really bother me.



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,058
Location: Houston, Texas

22 Oct 2009, 4:17 am

I chose yes.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,064

22 Oct 2009, 5:15 am

I hate inefficiency. I'm very into doing stuff with the minimum of fuss and bother. Sometimes I'm inefficient myself, when I can't see the easy way, but that's not so bad because I'm not aware that there is an easier way. But when I see it in myself or others, and particularly when others impose inefficiency on me, I detest it. I can't understand how anybody can maintain a work ethic when it's the norm to waste so much time - it's as if hard work is valued as an end in itself, even when it produces nothing of value.

The way governments and bosses are always telling us that we must work longer for less suggests that society is in crisis, that every ounce of human effort is required to stop us all going to the wall. Even the old and the disabled are being regularly looked at in the hope that they can be pushed back into the world of work. Yet the consumerist game is extremely wasteful, so we're basically working ourselves to death to inefficiently provide each other with things we don't even need.

Even giving money to charity can't be simple - there has to be a TV show or some kind of public spectacle, with everybody pledging cash via text messages, nobidy seems to want to just donate, they have to make somebody run a marathon dressed as Biffo the Bear first.

So often bosses have delegated one-off tasks to me that they could much more easily have done for themselves - explaining the details of what they want has often taken them longer than just doing it. Very often I've been completely unsuited for the role, but they don't seem to notice that, as long as they don't have to do it themselves.

But even when I can see the logic, I still hate inefficiency. I've sometimes wanted to make certain tasks more efficient at work, only to be told that those tasks aren't performed often enough to make it worthwhile to streamline them. Their reasoning is often perfectly sound, but once I know a task could be done using less labour, I find it painful to have to go the long way round every time.



CleverKitten
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 874
Location: Norfolk, Virginia, USA

22 Oct 2009, 7:06 am

Quote:
Main Entry: in·ef·fi·cient
Pronunciation: \-ˈfi-shənt\
Function: adjective
Date: 1750
: not efficient: as a : not producing the effect intended or desired b : wasteful of time or energy <inefficient operating procedures> c : incapable, incompetent <an inefficient worker>


Another type of "inefficiency" peeves the hell out of me.

People who will take things out of context and blow things out of proportion. They don't read the entire post, only skimming it, miss important details, and make all this extra fuss over nothing.
Certainly, that is a waste of time and energy, is it not? It also smacks of incapability and incompetence.

If they had only read the entire post and not insert some ridiculous hidden meaning into it, the fuss probably would not have been made. They would realize the intended effect.
They would have wasted way less time and energy.

:roll:


_________________
"Life is demanding without understanding."
- Ace of Base

Check out my blog: http://glanceoutthewindow.blogspot.com/


Last edited by CleverKitten on 22 Oct 2009, 7:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,058
Location: Houston, Texas

22 Oct 2009, 7:07 am

I like the episode of Harvey Birdman Attorney at Law that dealt with inefficiency.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


Rocky
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,074
Location: Uhhh...Not Remulak

22 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm

ToughDiamond wrote:
I hate inefficiency. I'm very into doing stuff with the minimum of fuss and bother. Sometimes I'm inefficient myself, when I can't see the easy way, but that's not so bad because I'm not aware that there is an easier way. But when I see it in myself or others, and particularly when others impose inefficiency on me, I detest it. I can't understand how anybody can maintain a work ethic when it's the norm to waste so much time - it's as if hard work is valued as an end in itself, even when it produces nothing of value.

The way governments and bosses are always telling us that we must work longer for less suggests that society is in crisis, that every ounce of human effort is required to stop us all going to the wall. Even the old and the disabled are being regularly looked at in the hope that they can be pushed back into the world of work. Yet the consumerist game is extremely wasteful, so we're basically working ourselves to death to inefficiently provide each other with things we don't even need.

Even giving money to charity can't be simple - there has to be a TV show or some kind of public spectacle, with everybody pledging cash via text messages, nobidy seems to want to just donate, they have to make somebody run a marathon dressed as Biffo the Bear first.

So often bosses have delegated one-off tasks to me that they could much more easily have done for themselves - explaining the details of what they want has often taken them longer than just doing it. Very often I've been completely unsuited for the role, but they don't seem to notice that, as long as they don't have to do it themselves.

But even when I can see the logic, I still hate inefficiency. I've sometimes wanted to make certain tasks more efficient at work, only to be told that those tasks aren't performed often enough to make it worthwhile to streamline them. Their reasoning is often perfectly sound, but once I know a task could be done using less labour, I find it painful to have to go the long way round every time.


Great post! Your last paragraph reminded me of the early days of personal computers before businesses used them as a matter of course. I knew how much more efficient things could be run using a computer, but no one around me even knew the potential of the computer! I managed to incorporate some basic computing into a couple of jobs I had. In one case I was forbidden to continue to use the computer data base I created which made things much more efficient. No reason was given. Later, I was amused to see this same company (Radio Shack) using a similar system, but on a company wide basis.


_________________
"Reality is not made of if. Reality is made of is."
-Author prefers to be anonymous.


Rocky
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,074
Location: Uhhh...Not Remulak

22 Oct 2009, 3:56 pm

OverlyIntense wrote:
I've gotten better about this. Seems to me now, that efficiency is boring for workers. I mean at some point things become so efficient that you feel like a robot, and in fact could probably be replaced by one.

Plus when I was younger, change was easier. It takes more effort as we get older. Things are also changing faster and faster.


Good point (efficiency being boring for the workers.) I agree that I dislike micro management by supervisors in the interest of efficiency. What I dislike is when management does not allow creative innovation by the workers which can result in greater efficiency.


_________________
"Reality is not made of if. Reality is made of is."
-Author prefers to be anonymous.


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,064

23 Oct 2009, 5:37 am

Rocky wrote:
Great post! Your last paragraph reminded me of the early days of personal computers before businesses used them as a matter of course. I knew how much more efficient things could be run using a computer, but no one around me even knew the potential of the computer! I managed to incorporate some basic computing into a couple of jobs I had. In one case I was forbidden to continue to use the computer data base I created which made things much more efficient. No reason was given. Later, I was amused to see this same company (Radio Shack) using a similar system, but on a company wide basis.

For some years I was often told to write up my work in a standard "work book" rather than using a computer. But it was so inefficient; if you write up the results of multi-tasking in a paper book, everything ends up in chronological order rather than being ordered by subject, so you've got a snippet about this followed by a snippet about that, which really isn't much use if you're searching later for a particular subject. Somehow I found that I just couldn't do it the paper way, so I continued using the PC and luckily nobody had the bottle to stop me. A few years later, and we're all using computers. I suspect the original reluctance to allow computer work was that the management was scared we'd find it too easy to alter the results after the fact. But we've been using computers for several years now and that doesn't seem to have been an issue.



OverlyIntense
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 47

23 Oct 2009, 6:20 am

ToughDiamond wrote:
For some years I was often told to write up my work in a standard "work book" rather than using a computer. But it was so inefficient; if you write up the results of multi-tasking in a paper book, everything ends up in chronological order rather than being ordered by subject, so you've got a snippet about this followed by a snippet about that, which really isn't much use if you're searching later for a particular subject. Somehow I found that I just couldn't do it the paper way, so I continued using the PC and luckily nobody had the bottle to stop me. A few years later, and we're all using computers. I suspect the original reluctance to allow computer work was that the management was scared we'd find it too easy to alter the results after the fact. But we've been using computers for several years now and that doesn't seem to have been an issue.


Maybe management is old, so it takes longer for new ideas to sink in. Try again after six months. Then a year later.



OverlyIntense
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 47

23 Oct 2009, 6:26 am

Rocky wrote:
Good point (efficiency being boring for the workers.) I agree that I dislike micro management by supervisors in the interest of efficiency. What I dislike is when management does not allow creative innovation by the workers which can result in greater efficiency.


Yeah, that sucks. That is truly boring. My last job was like that, where I worked as a care giver. It was very stressful, and I quit because it was effecting my ability to provide good care for the clients.