Undercover Wife Busts Husband by Posing as a Chatroom Teen

Post Reply New Topic

http://www.switched.com/2009/11/15/unde ... room-teen/

The article says the guy may be suffering from a neurological disorder. Dear
God please don't let this turn into a "I Have Asperger Syndrome Defense".

its stuff like that, that puts me off having relationships with people. How do you know if the person you are going to get invoilved with will be like that. The wife obviously did not think so when she married him 20 years ago.

I cant imagine how awful she must feel finding out her husband was doing that, he is just horrendous.

and I agree I think he will be useing the 'asperger defence'

It makes me so cross thinking of men on these teen sites grooming girls. My 11 year old daughter is very niave and it makes me so worried for her. I hate men like this

Ha ha ha.

Bet she feels pretty silly now, knowing he'd rather have a kid than be with her. Ugh!

Good for her

I always see it as really weird that anybody should prefer kids to adults sexually. Especially with the risk of being found out. Nobody knows what causes it, or how to cure it.

Bearshare? Isn't that P2P like Limewire is? Downloading music and movies illegally?

And exactly how often is the Asperger's defense used in cases like this?

I like how out of every single mental disorder diagnosed, people here are automatically saying he'll use AS. Despite the fact that there's no indication of that anywhere in the article, only that he may have a mental disorder of some sort. I saw this happen in another thread, where someone took a topic where there was a possibility of disorder (unspecified) being blamed, and made it all about how unfair it was to AS people, etc, etc; however, it wasn't AS at all, it was a different thing. Don't make it about something it's not.

But anyway, good for her for catching him. Bad for him for doing that.

Yeah, sincere greetings to that courageous woman.
Musn't be easy to do what she did.

Neurological doesn't necessarily mean mentally affected. I'm just back from my Neurologist now, and it's about my eye problem. My dad just visited his Neurologist about his back problem. Neurological only means "nervous system", in any part of the body.

yes, but why would they even have mentioned it if somebody didn't think it affected his reasoning ability?

Neurological problems, even if in the brain, don't affect reasoning. If that's what they meant, then they're both biased and stupid. It wouldn't hold in Court either way.

Er, yes, they can. Not so specifically as to leave somebody completely unaffected other than a lust for teenage girls, but they can.

For example?

Nervy perve topic

I suspect he was always a pedophile, and testing could discover what arouses specifically arouses him. This involves visual props and electrodes. Necessary, but disgusting.

If this were a recent behaviour, he could be tested for frontal lobe disease. That is neurological.

I'm glad they caught the perv, but what's with that photo of the wife? If her top was any lower her nipples would be showing (or maybe not ) and the coquettish pose is absurd. I realize she is the victim in more ways than one, but really, couldn't she have dressed a little more appropriately for the news service photo. And why would she want to have her photo in the news anyway? You would think she would be devastated by what was uncovered but that's not what the photo conveys. She looks as if she's about to go off on a tropical holiday. The article could do without the wife's photo. It detracts from the gravity of the crime and reduces the reporting to the level of trash journalism. The article's headline reads like a joke as well. "Undercover Wife Busts" could just as well be "Under-covered Wife's Bust"

The picture might be a vaction photo or some personal picture like that, not a planned photo for the newspaper. Look at the quality of it - it obviously wasn't taken very well, and the rest of the pictures don't match that quality in other articles. Not only that, but the camera strap is in the picture. I highly, highly doubt it was taken professionally. Maybe she submitted it herself, but they theoretically could of pulled it off a social site somewhere, since the couple were obviously internet savy and on some social websites. There's also no quotes from her, which suggests that maybe she didn't know about the article. If you look at the article that this one cites, all of the records are from the trial, not from her. There's nothing indicating that she's proud, although if she was, that's her right; she caught her husband before he could potentially hurt more girls.

As for it showing her bust - it covers a good bit of it, actually. If you look, she's obviously fairly large and sagging somewhat; her nipples probably are no where near the neckline. I've seen much skimper tops all the time.

Could the article do without the picture? Yes. But that's the paper's fault, not hers.