bdhkhsfgk wrote:
Maggiedoll wrote:
It's generally not considered appropriate to diagnose minors with personality disorders. At 17 I suppose not being an adult is only a technical/legal thing, but given that people with ASDs tend to mature more slowly, I still think any personality disorder diagnosis would be premature. Occasionally, there is someone so very notably manipulative and dishonest, who overtly refuses to examine their own feelings/motives to the point that personality disordered dynamics are pretty obvious, but other than that, trying to even specifically recognize a personality disorder in a member of an online forum seems kinda futile.
I don't think I slowly mature, I don't use internet slang when talking to someone, and I ENJOY watching mature movies, I understand sarcasm, I can talk in a cold and critizising way etc.
Read some of my previous posts, and you can see what I'm capable of.
Contrary to what a lot of people claim, you don't have to be mature to be
intelligent.
Edit: I'm not saying that you're immature, because I really don't know. But I've seen it mentioned a bunch of times that autistics mature more slowly than most people, and at 17 you're not supposed to be mature anyway. Just because you're intelligent doesn't mean that your brain is finished developing, or that your personality is quite "set." You can be intelligent and get all those "no, I don't believe that you're that young!" comments based on superficial measures of maturity like how much you use internet slang, and still not have reached your full maturity. Whether or not you use internet slang doesn't affect a personality disorder diagnosis, but whether or not your personality is fully developed yet does. I wasn't referring to maturity in the way that people they use "mature" as a compliment and "immature" as an insult, I was using the literal definition of mature as "fully developed."