Jamesy wrote:
Every person so far I have met with aspergers (about 4) have come across to me as a little geeky or ecentric.
Is this always the case?
I myself have dyslexia but for some reason were not as ecentric as aspies.
If statistics hold true and AS only affects about 1 in every 150 people, you're saying you've personally discussed Asperger Syndrome with 600 different people? That's assuming everyone you ever met with AS told you about their neurology, or even knew themselves. That's quite a bit of research.
It also depends on what you consider eccentric and what your own personal definition of GEEK is. Technically, a geek is a circus performer specializing in exotic and disturbing stage illusions, like sword swallowing or sticking needles through their faces, or biting the heads off small animals. I've never personally met anyone who did things like that, but I've never worked for a circus, where I assume that sort of thing is not viewed as especially eccentric.
The very criteria listed in the DSM for diagnosing Asperger Syndrome list several behaviors that are
by definition not typical of the average human being. If we were not unusual, we would not qualify as having the disorder in the first place. If I choose to refer to myself as eccentric or even geeky, that's one thing, but I don't appreciate being stereotyped by someone who has not lived with my condition.
How would you feel about people assuming that since dyslexia causes mixups in recognizing sequences of letters and numbers, that all people with dyslexia can't read or spell very well and are therefore functionally illiterate and ignorant?