Studies Reveal Why Kids Get Bullied and Rejected
Kids who get bullied and snubbed by peers may be more likely to have problems in other parts of their lives, past studies have shown. And now researchers have found at least three factors in a child's behavior that can lead to social rejection.
The factors involve a child's inability to pick up on and respond to nonverbal cues from their pals.
In the United States, 10 to 13 percent of school-age kids experience some form of rejection by their peers. In addition to causing mental health problems, bullying and social isolation can increase the likelihood a child will get poor grades, drop out of school, or develop substance abuse problems, the researchers say.
"It really is an under-addressed public health issue," said lead researcher Clark McKown of the Rush Neurobehavioral Center in Chicago.
And the social skills children gain on the playground or elsewhere could show up later in life, according to Richard Lavoie, an expert in child social behavior who was not involved with the study. Unstructured playtime — that is, when children interact without the guidance of an authority figure — is when children experiment with the relationship styles they will have as adults, he said.
Underlying all of this: "The number one need of any human is to be liked by other humans," Lavoie told LiveScience. "But our kids are like strangers in their own land." They don't understand the basic rules of operating in society and their mistakes are usually unintentional, he said.
Social Rejection
In two studies, McKown and colleagues had a total of 284 children, ages 4 to 16 years old, watch movie clips and look at photos before judging the emotions of the actors based on their facial expressions, tones of voice and body postures. Various social situations were also described and the children were questioned about appropriate responses.
The results were then compared to parent/teacher accounts of the participants' friendships and social behavior.
Kids who had social problems also had problems in at least one of three different areas of nonverbal communication: reading nonverbal cues; understanding their social meaning; and coming up with options for resolving a social conflict.
A child, for example, simply may not notice a person's scowl of impatience or understand what a tapped foot means. Or she may have trouble reconciling the desires of a friend with her own. "It is important to try to pinpoint the area or areas in a child's deficits and then build those up," McKown explained.
Ways to Help
When children have prolonged struggles with socializing, "a vicious cycle begins," Lavoie said. Shunned children have few opportunities to practice social skills, while popular kids are busy perfecting theirs. However, having just one or two friends can be enough to give a child the social practice he or she needs, he said.
Parents, teachers and other adults in a child's life can help, too. Instead of reacting with anger or embarrassment to a child who, say, asks Aunt Mindy if her new hairdo was a mistake, parents should teach social skills with the same tone they use for teaching long division or proper hygiene. If presented as a learning opportunity, rather than a punishment, children usually appreciate the lesson.
"Most kids are so desperate to have friends, they just jump on board," Lavoie said.
To teach social skills, Lavoie advises a five-step approach in his book "It's So Much Work to Be Your Friend: Helping the Child with Learning Disabilities Find Social Success" (Touchstone, 2006). The process works for children with or without learning disabilities and is best conducted immediately after a transgression has been made.
1) Ask the child what happened and listen without judgment.
2) Ask the child to identify their mistake. (Often children only know that someone got upset, but don't understand their own role in the outcome).
3) Help the child identify the cue they missed or mistake they made, by asking something like: "How would you feel if Emma was hogging the tire swing?" Instead of lecturing with the word "should," offer options the child "could" have taken in the moment, such as: "You could have asked Emma to join you or told her you would give her the swing after your turn."
4) Create an imaginary but similar scenario where the child can make the right choice. For example, you could say, "If you were playing with a shovel in the sand box and Aiden wanted to use it, what would you do?"
5) Lastly, give the child "social homework" by asking him to practice this new skill, saying: "Now that you know the importance of sharing, I want to hear about something you share tomorrow."
The studies are detailed in the current issue of the Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. They were funded by the Dean and Rosemarie Buntrock Foundation and the William T. Grant Foundation.
You know, the irritating thing about this article is that some genius wasted time and research funds studying this and not one of his academic peers said:
"Uhm...isn't what you're studying there just...high functioning autism?"
Doh!
_________________
"Strange, inaccessible worlds exist at our very elbows"
- Howard Phillips Lovecraft
I think kids get bullied because society seems to accept the fact that some juvenile sociopathic a***hole has the right to assault other children. They need to be studying the bullies and asking why they do what they do, and why culture seems to accept at face value that it's going to happen and it's normal, when if it happens to an adult the perpetrator of the acts can be charged and go to jail.
Not just HFA, but kids with ADHD go through that too.
I was never bullied terribly at school. I was a girl so I got more verbal abuse, of course I never understood it enough to affect me and I think the fact the I was extremely quiet and wandered around the school yard alone meant that no one had anything to bully me for. I was also taken out of school when I was 11 because I had poor grades.
_________________
My band photography blog - http://lostthroughthelens.wordpress.com/
My personal blog - http://helptheywantmetosocialise.wordpress.com/
One: Not all children with social difficulties are on the spectrum. It can also be the result of poor socialization during early childhood, abuse, or even just being very shy.
Two: Not all bullying is physical. A lot of it is emotional and mental. It makes it harder to prove. I do not believe it is accepted as much as tolerated (there is a difference, any gay person can tell you). Most public schools lack the resources to have a psychologist sit down with the bullies (of the physical variety) and find out why they are doing what they do. It is not usually sociopathic, it is usually due to abuse at home. Where as the emotional/mental peer abuse is generally done to raise the perpetrators social status. The two are not always mutually exclusive however.
Bullying is about a whole lot more than whether you can read social cues, though.
Being different in any way gets you stick even if it's just things like not going to the same café everyone else goes to or doing your hair in a SLIGHTLY different ponytail.
I'm with you. I notice this attitude of 'Well it's just part of life' and that is plain wrong. Disagreement and occasional fights are part of life, yes, but that is a VERY different thing from bullying.
_________________
'You're so cold, but you feel alive
Lay your hands on me, one last time' (Breaking Benjamin)
But neither abuse nor shyness has anything to do with a 'naturally' occurring inability to read social cues, which this study specifically mentioned.
And 'poor socialization in early childhood' is precisely what's being studied.
As others here have pointed out, the real crime is that they're trying to find something 'wrong' with the victim, instead of finding out what kind of 'damage' makes a bully a bully in the first place. The person who's being mistreated is not the problem.
Let's find a CURE for bullies.
A Clockwork Orange might be a good place to look for ideas.
_________________
"Strange, inaccessible worlds exist at our very elbows"
- Howard Phillips Lovecraft
I wish that was the case when it happens to an adult... that the perpetrator gets charged and goes to jail, but from my experience I only see that happening on movies for television.
_________________
"Has not my hand made all these things, and so they came into being?" declares the LORD. "This is the one I esteem: he who is humble and contrite in spirit, and trembles at my word." – Isaiah 66:2
DemonAbyss10
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=13263.jpg)
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,492
Location: The Poconos, Pennsylvania
But neither abuse nor shyness has anything to do with a 'naturally' occurring inability to read social cues, which this study specifically mentioned.
And 'poor socialization in early childhood' is precisely what's being studied.
As others here have pointed out, the real crime is that they're trying to find something 'wrong' with the victim, instead of finding out what kind of 'damage' makes a bully a bully in the first place. The person who's being mistreated is not the problem.
Let's find a CURE for bullies.
A Clockwork Orange might be a good place to look for ideas.
instead of curing them why dont we ship them off to war. They would serve more use taunting the enemy into submission. That or sentince them all to hard labor for the rest of their pathetic lives, or even just outright murder the bullies. Screw it if they have problems of their own, one less pox on the world is one less pox.
_________________
Myers Brigg - ISTP
Socionics - ISTx
Enneagram - 6w5
Yes, I do have a DeviantArt, it is at.... http://demonabyss10.deviantart.com/
This is BS. I don't like how the article just assumes the victims must have done something to "deserve" the bullying. From what I've observed, kids that get victimized are usually either verbally shy (and thus unable to defend themselves against teasing) or they have something superficially different about them (over(under)weight, bad at sports, odd looks, etc.). In almost all the cases the victim did nothing, intentional nor unintentional, to provoke the bullying.
But neither abuse nor shyness has anything to do with a 'naturally' occurring inability to read social cues, which this study specifically mentioned.
Another possibility is that some people naturally have low desire of socialization (perhaps they prefer reading his book instead of go playing soccer). - perhpas the rule "The number one need of any human is to be liked by other humans" it is not true to everybody (nobody likes to be disliked, but for some people indifference is enough)
About the study, note that one of the exemples of this "inability to read social cues" is "[inability to] coming up with options for resolving a social conflict"; a person who is simply associal will have big difficulties with that, because for them, when two people disagree, each one should follow their own way, instead of negotiating a solution.
And, if you are alone in the palyground, you are in danger, even if you don't do nothing to irritate other people.
Actually this is not a study about bullies, but about children who are bullied and rejected by their peers including peers who are not habitually bullies. I was bullied by a bully and so were many other people in the bully's environment. However, I was also rejected and bullied by peers who did not bully or reject anyone else and are not realistically described as bullies.
The study is not about children who bully other people as a matter of course, but about why some children are bullied or rejected, persistently, even by children who are not accurately described as bullies, but whose bullying or rejection of a particular child is an exception to the ordinary rule of their conduct.
CockneyRebel
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=316_1738902286.png)
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,358
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love
I think that some of the posters in this thread are very naive and unrealistic. The behavior they want eliminated is normal typical human functioning not some kind of aberration. Changing such behavior is difficult if it is even possible. In terms of a child being picked on and rejected others are actually allowed to choose who they socialize with and even if their current peers can be taught to not pick on them, then how will this help that child if they move schools or attempt to interact with children outside their school, or when they are adults and need to get along in the work place?
In an ideal world everyone would accept everyone else, we'd all hold hands and sing coke anthems together in perfect harmony. We do not live in an ideal world though. Parents who want to help their children have a better experience when attempting to interact with peers are unlikely to be able to change each and every one of those peers, nearly as easily as they could teach their child adaptive behaviors that will benefit their child in all kinds of enviornments and circumstances, throughout their childhood and into their adulthood.
It makes a lot more sense for a parent to try to upskill their own child than to try and make everyone else's child a "better person". A parent has more ability to expand their own child's skills than they have to change the behavior of every child at their child's school. Even if a parent can teach every child at their child's school to be nicer people, any benefits to their own child will evaporate as soon as their own child leaves that environment for one fill of children who have not been "improved". If the parents choose to upskill their own child, then the child takes the benefits with them whereever they go.
I read something disturbing about this kind of thing in an article written by a teacher: "some kids are just born to be bullied, and in spite of what the parents say, there's very little you can do about it." I was bullied growing up, and I thought it was because I was chubby and had no interest in sports. But, to my surprise, some friends and acquaintances took lumps too - and they had many qualities I envied, like being more in shape, taller, more self-possessed, better liked by girls, etc. They were all of these things, but were still subjected to abuse for incredibly trivial BS like unselfconsciously snorting or being "poor." Still other times they would get in trouble with other kids for what I think was just plain having the balls to stick up for themselves.
I theorize that bullying is like sex: it's a pleasure available to certain people, and promiscuity may be immoral, but it's fun and builds your self-confidence. The only solution is a culture where bullying is socially unacceptable, like it's as bad as snorting meth or screwing your sister. That's the kind of paradigm shift Edward Bernays should have been working on instead of making women think cigarettes made them more independent or that only disposable cups were sanitary, etc.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Who knew gender reveal does not need to be an explosion. |
06 Feb 2025, 11:30 pm |
Math question supposed to reveal if someone is autistic |
05 Dec 2024, 1:45 am |
New Satellite Images Reveal Antarctica is 10X Greener Than |
06 Dec 2024, 5:57 pm |
Scientists Reveal Source Of Mysterious Radio Signal That Tra |
14 Jan 2025, 8:03 pm |