My Feminist Aspies Online paper - stuck!!

Post Reply New Topic

I'm submitting an abstract for a paper about aspie women and the internet to the editors of this upcoming publication:

Feminist Cyberspaces: Pedagogies in Transition

This anthology will explore the ways in which new media technologies can be used in the Women's Studies classroom. The editors are interested in articles that address the ways in which these technologies can further the goals of many Women's Studies courses by encouraging students to examine how gender, race, and class can shape both our real and our virtual worlds. A number of Women's Studies scholars recognize not only our students' growing interest in digital media production but also the transgressive, political potential of new media technologies. As many colleges and universities embrace innovative media technologies to enrich learning in the 21st century, new issues emerge for Women's Studies educators when teaching these purported "Millennials."

I usually write about texts - literature, song lyrics, films - using critical theory so this is a different style for me. I guess you could say it's sociology. Does anybody have any advice or ideas for me?

I think you need to narrow your focus from aspie women and the internet. That is a hugely broad topic, making forming a coherent thesis quite difficult. Focus on how the internet enhances the lives of aspie women (for example, pick your own topic). With a more precise focus, your thesis should become apparent, which will make writing your abstract much easier.

Sorry, I was oversimplifying. This is what I emailed to the editor before she asked me for an abstract:

....I thought I might attempt to write something about platforms such as blogging and forums allowing the usually socially phobic aspie woman to engage with other feminists and get involved in activism. I have recently begun blogging myself, under a pseudonym, and have already started to make the kind of connections I usually find impossible in the social world...

I'm thinking of things like the women's section on WP, the AWA (particularly on Facebook), individual aspie women's blogs etc. But what am I trying to say or find out? With critical papers I'm usually looking at whether a writer has achieved what they set out to, or in some cases if they've unintentionally achieved something interesting. I'm analysing their work to find evidence of my point and come to a conclusion. Can someone help me see what I am supposed to be trying to do with a sociology paper?

It might help if you focused on a few women and their respective internet outlets, talking about how communicating on a forum or blog changed how they deal with being an aspie woman in an NT man's world. A case study, if you will.