A "Theory of Mind" rant...
JSchoolboy
Blue Jay
Joined: 10 Nov 2009
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 93
Location: Southern California, USA
... is what I was going to post, after reading the recent Scientific American article by Karen Schrock about the reseach that says Aspies are less likely to "attribute events in our lives to a higher power or supernatural force". In the article, she talks about AS and Autistic folks having an "impaired theory of mind".
That seemed utterly absurd to me - how could anyone claim that being on the spectrum means you don't understand that other people have their own thoughts, separate and different from your own? I was pretty pissed off, and ready to go on about it for a while. But I decided to see what WP folks had to say about ToM before posting.
I found this lovely thread about ToM: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postx115145-15-0.html
Now I get it. I still think the article over-generalizes and draws unwarranted conclusions, but I'm no longer pissed off.
Once again, WP to the rescue.
JSB
I read that thread, and there's something I don't understand:
The specialist had two bears, one had a jelly bean and she put it under a cup and then left the room. While the first bear was gone the second bear took the bean from under the cup and hid it under the pillow. Then the first bear returns and the specialist asks my son where she will look for the jelly bean. His answer was under the pillow. The test was repeated a few other times with variations on the same theme and always he answered where the bean was and not where the first bear would assume that the bean was.
Now son is very intelligent and it blew my mind seeing him get this thing wrong (especially given his diagnosis was ultimately leading to my own diagnosis).
And he certainly wont make that mistake again - but he'll be overcoming it by intellectual means, not by the same intuitive natural way and NT would.
You can simplify theory of mind as the ability to put yourself in someone else shoes (empathy). It is easy to think that you can do this when you are actually using your intellect to simulate that ability. I've been closely and critically watching my own 'empathy' since I became aware of my aspergers and am confident that I do not have theory of mind - it is a purely intellectual construct in my case.
Whereas a bit over a year ago I would have thought anyone crazy to suggest I didn't have empathy.
In terms of you being told to "get it" - you're never going to be able to over and above how you are now - what you can do is learn to improve your intellectual substitute.
How would you know if you have a "real" theory of mind or if it's just an intellectual construct?
I'm not sure I see the connection between these two concepts.
ToM however, I think is most obvious in the fact that so many Aspergians when they first discover their condition, are convinced that their particular case is a 'mild' one. I used that word myself until I came to fully understand just how pervasive a neurological disorder really is.
Having impaired Theory of Mind, its easy to go through life year after year never realizing just how odd, how completely different we appear to the NTs around us. I mean, we all know in our hearts that we're not like everybody else, but I think we fool ourselves into believing we're passing for normal because we have a limited ability to see ourselves as others see us.
Thanks for posting that link. I was a bit confused by the idea myself, but the OP's (for that thread) story about her MIL and SILs cleared it up. It reminded me of the time my neighbor came over and said something complementary about my garden and then added, "I wish I could garden, but I just can't." It took me an hour or so to figure out why she got annoyed and left when I offered to teach her. Then I got irritated with her for saying she wanted to learn when she really didn't. I guess I don't play these games very well, either.
BINGO!
Until I learned of AS, I always knew deep inside that I wasn't like everyone else, but I always wondered why everyone was tolerant of each other's "quirks" but not mine. It never sank in that they saw each other as normal and it was just me who was different.
It is even worse when we believe a limited ability to rationalize how someone else might look at something = empathy as done by other NTs.
I think you hit the nail square on the head, Willard. .
JSchoolboy
Blue Jay
Joined: 10 Nov 2009
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 93
Location: Southern California, USA
I'm not sure I see the connection between these two concepts.
That's one of the issues I have with the article. Not attributing events to supernatural forces just seems like clarity to me. I think it's bogus to conclude that Aspies don't look for supernatural causes because they're incapable of conceiving of supernatural causes. Or perhaps the point is that non-impaired ToM confuses people into believing that events have supernatural causes? If I look at it that way, it doesn't sound so insulting to Aspies.
Having impaired Theory of Mind, its easy to go through life year after year never realizing just how odd, how completely different we appear to the NTs around us. I mean, we all know in our hearts that we're not like everybody else, but I think we fool ourselves into believing we're passing for normal because we have a limited ability to see ourselves as others see us.
Passing for normal? Yeah, I definitely don't make it. How about passing for eccentric?
JSB
CockneyRebel
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,274
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love
Yes, Theory of Mind seems to means different things to different people. As a baseline, my cat Annie has absolutely no Theory of Mind. If I point to the catnip mouse across the room, she's going to sniff my finger. My son used to sit in the car seat in the back and say "What's that?" (" What's what?")" That" and he wouldn't point or try to describe the object. It seems to me that ToM is developmental and everyone is impaired to some extent, otherwise there would be a lot less strife in life. I can know that other people have thoughts and perspectives different from mine, but how do I know if that is learned or instinctual? People have often told me I was "different" and I honestly don't know why because I do not strive to be different or to conform. If I asked someone directly how they think I seem to people I don't think I would get an honest answer, but unsolicited comments include different,weird, enigmatic. I guess I don't know if my ToM is more or less impaired than the average NT. It confuses me.
Snicker. I have a sister who gives directions by saying "Turn this way," or "Turn that way," without looking up or pointing. We agreed on a code: "This way" is toward her (if she's in the passenger seat, right), "that way" is away from her (left).
I always thought ToM was having the understnading that people often think differently to you, which is why experiments like this never made sense to me:
Now, what that is really testing is if the child understands the concept of ignorance. Using the bears, one could devise a better test, by attaching a particular belief - "I like cheese", for example (always use that one, since JD on Scrubs said it into a Dictaphone ) - to the 1st bear, and asking the child what the 2nd bears beliefs would be on cheese. If they project the 1st bears beliefs on to the 2nd, they lack ToM.
Simples.
Theory of Mind is the ability not just to understand other people's behavior, but to perceive that they have a consciousness and an internal life. There's a fine line between labeling behavior as "anger" or "sadness" and actually understanding that the person feels anger or sadness.
Also known as Theory of Consciousness, it's surprisingly nebulous and "know it when I see it."
Mine was slow to develop and I tend to forget it often, but I recently had a chance to see the difference between an actual ToC and a purely intellectual understanding that other people are intelligent, because, under stress, I lost it entirely. (Yeah, I got it back. Not that you'd know from how I act.)
A buggy ToC explains certain issues we tend to have, such as assuming identical knowledge.
As for why this would be related to supernatural beliefs, I haven't read the article, but I would assume that being wired to perceive "other" consciousness means being wired to perceive the presence of God, and if you believe in God (or other spirits or something), you're more likely to attribute events to him than if you don't believe in him.
It seems so odd to me that the 'normal' human tendency is to project one's own habits of consciousness outward onto something unseen, unidentifiable and indemonstrable and assume a living, thinking presence with no proof other than "I think, therefore thought is everywhere" - and this is a healthy Theory of Mind?
There's more tangible evidence for Ancient Astronauts than there is for an invisible god, and yet we're the ones with a disorder for remaining skeptical? I actually don't have a problem with the notion of some creative intelligence behind the design of the universe, but I'm not convinced of this benevolent God who listens to individual prayers and passes out blessings like Santa Claus. I got burned with that Santa Claus trick as a child and I vowed never to be duped with that kind of nonsense again.
As far as 'supernatural causes' goes...I've actually seen indications here on WP that there are a great many Aspergians fascinated by all sorts of Mysticism and Paranormal phenomena. I just tend to think of 'supernatural' as not meaning 'inexplicable' but rather "not fully explained YET'
What's that saying about 'any sufficiently advanced technology will appear as magic to a society not yet advanced enough to comprehend it'...
At some Sacramento AS&etc website said to belong to the "Sac AS IS Parents & Caregivers group" - - 3 core deficits would be (a) Theory of Mind deficit (b) weak central coherence (c) executive dysfunction. Maybe the UC Davis MIND Institute is a 2 hr drive, but we hate going into urban areas. Another ToM thing not mentioned yet in this thread - - "... also means the person has difficulty in distinguishing whether someone's actions are intentional or accidental" - - & we would add this - - maybe the person has bad intentions towards us but there's no telling. Also nearby is a guru called Garcia Winner, who translates ToM into "Social Thinking" - - and others would say "social cognition." Part of the idea is how to effectively get what you want. One is ejected from the birth tube and already needs stuff. Very soon the baby figures out that there is a variety of exchange system in force. For example, to get a thing you gotta start bawling or looking very cute. But even on the 1st day, the baby gets taught that many other things are essential for one to have a full, meaningful, & happy life. We ALL have been NT brainwashed. Some say one must know who you are & what you want - - but maybe it is equally important to know who you aren't & what you don't need.
I believed I was normal after I went through my childhood where I knew I acted different. Then I was was just told I was strange by one girl. Then later on, an autistic told me I was the strangest person he ever met... seriously!
I even see it in videos of me, I don't act like other people, but I can't put my finger on it...
Anyway, I think I'm acting okay, but apparently I'm not, it's tough.
_________________
Crazy Bird Lady!! !
Also likes Pokemon
Avatar: A Shiny from the new Pokemon Pearl remake, Shiny Chatot... I named him TaterTot...
FINALLY diagnosed with ASD 2/6/2020
I think you hit the nail square on the head, Willard. .
I have been having problems getting my head around this theory of mind thing. I think your quote above is gonna help me understand it a bit better. Especially because others have picked up on your quote.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Majorie Taylor Green rant |
07 Dec 2024, 5:08 pm |
Leonard Susskind calls the end of String Theory |
07 Nov 2024, 6:51 pm |
Do you see random images in your mind’s eye?
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
11 Dec 2024, 12:08 pm |
Grateful yesterday for my 'wild mind'
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
14 Dec 2024, 5:34 pm |