Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 

MotownDangerPants
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 955

13 Jun 2010, 11:59 am

I guess I don't really understand how they determine if an autistic person is mentally ret*d or not. I understand that autism with an IQ under 70 is considered mental retardation, but asfaik someone with a low verbal IQ who scores poorly in many areas of the test will often have a high functional IQ, so how can they be sure how high the IQ of someone who is severely autistic is if they can't even take an 1Q test properly? Couldn't these people have extremely high functional IQs that can't be measured? How do you know what's inside the person's mind if they can't express themselves or aren't aware enough to take a test?



Leekduck
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 620
Location: Britain

13 Jun 2010, 12:07 pm

i should mention that IQ is different from intelligence



MotownDangerPants
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 955

13 Jun 2010, 12:11 pm

Leekduck wrote:
i should mention that IQ is different from intelligence


So how do they know how intelligent someone is? Autistics who can't talk could have of the highest functional IQs around. IDK how that's mental retardation.



Leekduck
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 620
Location: Britain

13 Jun 2010, 12:17 pm

MotownDangerPants wrote:
Leekduck wrote:
i should mention that IQ is different from intelligence


So how do they know how intelligent someone is? Autistics who can't talk could have of the highest functional IQs around. IDK how that's mental retardation.


Depends how to define Intelligence



Kiley
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 879

13 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm

They really can't know, only make their best guess. There are so many different kinds of intelligence and we can't measure all of them. I've got a child who is profoundly gifted but has a rather mediocre IQ. There are other tests that measure his intelligence/academic ability in the 99.5+percentile, but there are a lot of people out there for whom there is no adequate test. There are lots of people with all kinds of smarts that we have no clue how to measure. There are loads of people running around with profound gifts who think they aren't smart because they didn't do well at school wich tends to cater to very limited learning styles. We are wasting all kinds of human ability with our shortsightedness.

I think one of the reasons some curebies are curebies is that they want to know what's going on inside autistic minds that they can't understand. They don't always mean it in a bad way, even if they are sometimes misguided. Sometimes people just know there is something wonderful going on with that person, and they want to connect to them but can't figure out how because of autism.



Mudboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,441
Location: Hiding in plain sight

13 Jun 2010, 3:03 pm

Being stuck inside your own head is totally different than having limited brain function.


_________________
When I lose an obsession, I feel lost until I find another.
Aspie score: 155 of 200
NT score: 49 of 200


MrXxx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2010
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,760
Location: New England

13 Jun 2010, 3:23 pm

MotownDangerPants wrote:
I guess I don't really understand how they determine if an autistic person is mentally ret*d or not. I understand that autism with an IQ under 70 is considered mental retardation, but asfaik someone with a low verbal IQ who scores poorly in many areas of the test will often have a high functional IQ, so how can they be sure how high the IQ of someone who is severely autistic is if they can't even take an 1Q test properly? Couldn't these people have extremely high functional IQs that can't be measured? How do you know what's inside the person's mind if they can't express themselves or aren't aware enough to take a test?


The short answer is, "It doesn't matter." Might sound cruel, but what is the rest of the world to do if the person can't communicate well enough to "tell us" how intelligent they are? Intelligence is measured by what one can or cannot "produce." If you can't demonstrate correct answers to a series of questions, there is know way for anyone else to know whether the person taking the test knows the answers.

Suppose they do know the answers, and are able to process everything they see and hear, maybe even better than the rest of us?

If they can't communicate it to the rest of us, it's of no use to anyone, including themselves, other than in their own private world that can't be shared with anyone.

I know this kind of stuff can sound harsh to some of us, but there are at least SOME realities we have no choice but to accept. If you can't share your skills, they are of no value to anyone.

For the sake of argument, I'll use myself as an example. I started writing songs decades ago. For nearly five years, they were recorded on tape, and put in drawers where no one but me ever heard them. It took me that long to realize they were basically worthless to anyone but me sitting around collecting dust. No one else ever heard them, so no one cared. For better or worse, I'm putting them out there now, letting others hear them. Now, they have value.

That's a bit of a simplistic comparison, because I know the songs had value for me, and there are some writers who never release their work, and it's fine with them. They enjoy it, and it makes them happy. They don't need anyone else to enjoy them.

It's a lot different though when we're talking about intelligence. You can't measure what you can't see. Effectively it's the same to the observer as if it doesn't exist. For all we know some people with full blown "debilitating" Autism may be processing mathematics, language, and whatever else at a level none of the rest of us will ever realize. And if they are, of what use is it to anyone but themselves in their own world? None really.

From there, all that really matters to the "rest of the world" is whether the Autistic can care for themselves. Can they live a safe life without supervision? Can they take care of their own hygiene? If not, that's a problem for us, because someone has to do it for them. That's something we are morally obligated to do, and something we can measure, so it does matter.

Until someone can come up with some kind of "Sci-fi" type way of "seeing" these people's thoughts, and use it as a means of actually seeing or hearing what really goes on inside their heads, whether anything is happening is irrelevant, because we can't know.


_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...


Mudboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,441
Location: Hiding in plain sight

13 Jun 2010, 4:25 pm

It does matter. What if after years and years of therapy they become able to communicate with the rest of the world? The therapy would be wasted on a ret*d person, but not on an autistic one.
13 year old mute autistic girl finally speaks through computer after years of silence


_________________
When I lose an obsession, I feel lost until I find another.
Aspie score: 155 of 200
NT score: 49 of 200