Quote:
When it plays out in the real world, though, it's easy for people to get a wrong impression. Imagine my wife and me, walking on the recreational trail. She trips on a stick and falls. I turn and look at her. There's no sign of injury. None of her limbs seem twisted or broken. She did not yell loudly, and she's not making any loud noises now.
"Are you damaged?" I ask because I know it's possible to sustain damage that's not visible from the outside. I'm not too worried, though, because I know most falls do not result in injury. I've seen this before.
"No, I don't think so." Her answer reassures me that there is no cause for alarm. I'm relieved.
"OK, then, get up and let's go." I give the only practical answer I can see. The day is passing, and we are standing still. Time to get moving again!
I thought this was really funny because in Scotland this kind of exchange would be considered perfectly normal. If he's considered "callous" by anyone who happens to see this, then I would think it more likely that it's the tone of voice, facial expression or body language which is seen as being negative.
It seems to me that cultural norms and expectations can have a huge impact on whether someone's behaviour is considered "strange" or not. This summer I visited an Irish friend, who has lived in England for 3 years now, having previously lived in Scotland for about 10 years. She commented that English people seem to make much more eye contact than Scots, and to get more exercised about a lack of eye contact.