bicentennialman wrote:
It just occurred to me how odd that assumption was. Why does something have to be wrong for you to have a "rich inner life"? If you have a choice between having a rich inner life or a poor inner life, wouldn't you choose the former? It doesn't mean something's wrong elsewhere.
That was my thought, too.
It seems to be predicated on the assumption that social relations are the center and focus of everything and objectively more important than anything else.
One might just as well assume that people who spend all their time and energy in socializing do so because their inner life is gravely deficient, and so they have to fill up the emptiness with hours of talking to other people. (Actually, I used to think this was true. But I am increasingly recognizing that that is probably not how NT extraverts experience it.)