DGuru wrote:
Considering we relied more on the rules of logic to construct our use of language while NTs relied more based on social absorption I've thought maybe this is how language formed in the first place. People made "words" up based on what sounded like what they were trying to represent, but overtime social conventions would change these words. I have always thought the English language was "inadequate" for expressing my ideas and "needed more words". In humanity's early days a lot more people would've been thinking that about what ever language they spoke back then.
I don't think I used the rules of logic to learn language. Basically I always heard words as only sounds, and still do if I'm not trying with a lot of effort to hear them as words (same as I don't put ideas onto objects either). But growing up I didn't even know what words were for until quite late. And only gradually did the meaning seep in until I could finally understand them. It seemed to be more from patterns of words and patterns of sensory input, rather than logic. Logic is an idea-thing and so are words and that's why I've had problems with both of them.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams