Earlier this evening I received an article on Facebook by the BBC that said that of 100 top classic books most people have read less than 6. It then lists the books. The Facebook thing said to mark the ones you have read in bold and to italic those you have read some of but never finished. I bolded the few I'd read and then italicised the dozens I'd started but never finished, then sent it to my friends. One of my friends did it too and it was obvious she is better read than me. She had fully read more than double the amount I had read. So I jokingly commented with:
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
You appear to have read more than me in complete books, but if I get to add all my half read books together, I think we might be even.
What followed has left me confused, very upset and a little bit scared:
My Friend wrote:
cos even is very important right? i did notice that you had lots in italics!
MotherKnowsBest wrote:
Lol. Nah, I can admit that my edjumacation may have fallen short.
The problem I have is that if something interests me it gets 200%, if it doesn't it gets 0%. The italics show that I have tried to overcome this but failed. Take Jane Eyre.... The first half of the book is when she is in the orphanage and is really interesting and engaging. I have read this half many times. But when it gets to the second half where she is a governess, my brain turns off and I can read the same page over and over again and it won't even register.
My Friend wrote:
what's your point though? that even though i have read more of these than you, you really have read more than me? or that the list is wrong? it's only a list!
What have I done wrong? Someone please help me to understand.