I agree, MrXxx.
Christopher Baddock's "The Imprinted Brain" approaches autism and schizophrenia in a heavy black and white fashion. He explains his theory using a lot of stereotypical traits from both sides, and spends less time exploring the middle, although he acknowledges it briefly. (He also repeats himself to much, but that's an unrelated issue I have with his book.) Other than that, it's an interesting read, but disappointing overall.
Here's an excerpt from the introduction, which piqued my interest, but the theory fell flat in the end:
Quote:
In a similar kind of way, autistic deficits in key cognitive skills have revealed the basis of normal development and given us a unique and unexpected insight into the mind. Specific cognitive skills often missing or deficient in autism reveal how the normal mind works and explain both the social and cognitive difficulties of autistics. Thanks to these insights, the new theory proposes that the spectrum of autistic disorders is mirrored by a psychotic one, and that where autistics show deficits in mental development, psychotics show pathological over- growth: cancers of the mind, so to speak. And just like visual agnosia and optic ataxia, the contrasting deficits of autism and psychosis reveal two parallel cognitive systems that normally blend more or less perfectly, but expose their fundamental differences when one or the other disorder supervenes.
Just going by some thread topics that are common here, it's possible that if people here read The Imprinted Brain, a few might start thinking they have schizophrenia instead of autism, i.e., over-sensitivity/emotional = "over-mentalistic" thinking, aka schizophrenia. He consistently upholds the idea that autistic people think "mechanistically" too strongly to be as affected by what other people say to them, etc.
I read it over two months ago, but that's the gist of it.
Last edited by MechAnime on 19 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.