rabbit90 wrote:
SammichEater wrote:
I know that I'm an aspie, there's really no reason to prove it. It's just not worth the hassle.
I really do not understand this logic. Why say "yes I have it I don't need a medical professional to tell me that"? If you think you need to have this diagnosis, but not receive help for it, surely there was something bothering you enough to seek an explanation to your behavior, why then, would you not receive a positive confirmation of your suspected autistic spectrum disorder, and get some further help?
Well, let's see.
I'm 50. Given the fact that it's difficult for even qualified folks to diagnose AS in adults, and the fact that there is no one in this town that even claims to be qualified to do so, I don't feel particularly confident that I would be able to get an accurate evaluation of my probable AS.
Then, even if I traveled to another state to see someone who is qualified, there's the minor detail of not having any way to confirm that I've had issues since I was a little kid. My parents have both been dead for over 20 years. My brother is only 3 years older than me, so he isn't going to be able to talk about how I was at 2 or 3 or 4 years old - and even later, we weren't exactly close. I have no old report cards or things like that, and schools don't keep copies of them for 40+ years.
Next . . . you assume that there is "further help" available. Maybe there is, where you live. Here, there isn't. Well, I suppose I could find a shrink to work with me - assuming I could pay them $200+ per session, of course!
Cliff's Notes version:
1. Getting an accurate diagnosis as an adult is a crapshoot.
2. No documentation to demonstrate that my issues have existed since early childhood.
3. Complete absence of any services, even if I do obtain a diagnosis.
One more thing:
Assuming that I found someone qualified to diagnose an adult, and that my lack of documentation didn't disqualify me from a diagnosis, and that I didn't care that being diagnosed would not have any advantages . . . it is known that people can "grow out of" a diagnosis. I know that I have impairments, and that they stem from traits which match Asperger's. I also know that many traits have been quashed so thoroughly that I've nearly forgotten that they ever existed, and that many which remain are far less problematic that they used to be. I am 90%+ sure that I do meet the criteria now, and 100% sure that I did when I was younger - except for the fact that the criteria weren't defined until I was 34 years old. I'm convinced that I am somewhere on the spectrum. What good would it do me to spend a lot of money to be told, "You undoubtedly met the criteria when you were younger, but at this point in your life you juuuuuuuuuust miss having 'clinically significant' impairment."