wefunction wrote:
My response wasn't harsh, just curt and lacking a helpful elaboration.
For some reason this made me laugh. I do curt and unhelpful all too well.
Quote:
"Would you like to open the door for me?"
Most of us would probably say "No". Opening a door sounds boring and pointless and something someone else can rightfully do for themselves. However, let's look further... opening a door is reasonably easy so why would she ask? Is there an undisclosed reason why she would ask to have the door opened that would make her incapable of doing it herself? There was a car full of shopping bags that needed to be brought in. Okay. Do you want your mom to have to struggle with the door and with all the bags? No, likely you would not want that to happen. So, do you want to open the door? Yes, you actually do.
In the future, if you know there's a car full of shopping bags, consider making the offer or, even better, offer to fetch the bags for her (or at least help).
This is a very good elucidation of Theory of Mind issues. All of this is reasonable if one is able to step outside of themselves and evaluate a question such as "Would you like to open the door for me?" from the context in which it is presented. This is a primary deficit among autistics. Offering opportunities to react appropriately will have mixed results. I cannot expect a blind person to tell me if the traffic light is red no matter how many times I present the opportunity. I can teach them to listen to traffic and from that perhaps conclude which direction is stopped, but they still cannot see the light. Much of what autistics must learn is ways to infer the information that is obvious to others. It is never perfect.
_________________
When God made me He didn't use a mold. I'm FREEHAND baby!
The road to my hell is paved with your good intentions.