SoSayWeAll wrote:
Ferdinand wrote:
SoSayWeAll wrote:
I also think that a lot of the books I read when I was little in the 80s/early 90s simply will not be relatable to any kids I might have in the future, and that I was of the last generation that would get a lot of them.
Like Chick Soup for the teenage soul?
I'm actually thinking more of books like the Ramona Quimby books. I'm not sure how a modern kid would relate to those, set back in the 1950s and early 60s. Other books might suffer from this as well, especially sci-fi, where a lot of predictions may seem laughable in light of JUST how fast technology has advanced.
They just made a movie called BEEZUS AND RAMONA. Maybe that'll revive an interest in those books in today's generation (kind of like HARRIET THE SPY, although that movie was not at all faithful to the book, IMO).
Interesting idea, but I agree that people who would socialize IRL will do so in the presence or absence of such technology, and that those who wouldn't, wouldn't.
However, I was reminded of something one of my professors told us: how his 14-year-old daughter had her bf break up with her via text message.
(Unless, of course, this was a long-distance relationship....)
"Acquired ASD?" No, that's a misnomer, unless technology leads to the neurological differences that exist in people on the spectrum. Maybe many, MANY generations down the line, but now? Don't think so.
People do change their behaviors with the advent of new technology and societal changes, but that's very different from acquiring a neurological condition.
_________________
The existence of the leader who is wise
is barely known to those he leads.
He acts without unnecessary speech,
so that the people say,
'It happened of its own accord.' -Tao Te Ching, Verse 17