NotCrazy wrote:
Phonic wrote:
Autism is lifelong, but the most overt symptoms can be managed through therapy and medication, eventually to the point where it is so mild that a diagnosis might no longer be apt, you've still got the gene - and therefor you're still autistic, but it's not longer such a "disability"
I don't think I've ever heard of someone who completely managed all of their symptoms, I find that hard to believe.
But if the symptoms can be managed to the point of no longer being diagnosed isn't that technically a type of cure? Especially if it is achieved through therapy alone. Isn't that just learning to adapt?
Just for the record I don't believe this girl. If you watch her videos they mostly deal with her bragging about how much smarter she is than everyone else. I suspect there is something else going on here.
I see it more like having cancer* which is "in remission." You are not considered to be "cured," even though you no longer have a treatable disease.
Similarly, ASDs are understood to be a difference in how the brain works. With really good therapy, and a lot of hard work, some people may be able to reduce** the negative impacts that difference makes in their day-to-day life to the point that they no longer cause the clinically significant impairments required for a diagnosis. At that point, they would be considered to be neurologically AS, but their symptoms would be sub clinical. The difference in how their brain works is still there, so they aren't "cured."
Also, there is a phenomenon referred to as "mid life autistic burnout." Someone who has overcome the impairing symptoms of their ASD may be doing so only with great effort. They may, at some point and for various reasons, no longer be able to keep up that level of effort, at which time their symptoms would return -many times they are worse when they do. Again using the cancer analogy, I have a friend who has been cancer free for nearly 3 decades - but if it comes back, he wouldn't be considered to have "gotten" it again. It would simply no longer be in remission.
* I realize that a "cancer" analogy only goes a short distance. I am using it only to point out another situation in which something can "go away" but not be considered "cured."
**edited to change "some people can reduce" to "some people may be able to reduce"
Last edited by another_1 on 04 Apr 2011, 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.