Tuttle wrote:
Is this something others can do? If you were asked in a clinical setting to make a "sad" and then a "happy" and then an "angry" and then a "scared" face do you think you'd be able to do it? If you know, would others say the face you come up with is somewhat natural?
If asked like that in a clinical setting, I'll recall situations in which one is supposed to show these emotions and then move my face accordingly.
So rather than moving my face to display an what an emotion look like, I move my face to display an expression based on a generalisation of which facial muscles to move where from what many others show in variations in situations where they express forms of anger.
That's acting I guess, it sure looks genuine to most people by now. I have memorised tons such situations, the emotions and reasons involved in them and the generalised facial movements that are tied to specific feelings as well as a large number of slight, important variations of these feelings. Because you know, anger can look different depending on the situation.
I won't come up with a face in 2-5 seconds (after which people usually get awfully noisy and impatient for a reaction/answer!) that matches if I try to imagine I felt anger or if I tried to remember the face I make when I feel anger.
_________________
Autism + ADHD
______
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett