Is there some sort of 'test' for Asperger's?
Hey, I'm Geralt. New here, so erm, greetings.
To the point... I've always suspected that there's some explanation to my social issues. Most people simply assumed that I was just incredibly shy when around other people and that it would pass, but it hasn't changed at all. I'm 18 now fyi.
Summed up:
-Can't maintain eye contact, no matter how hard I want/try to
-Can't keep a conversation going
-Spend a lot of time alone through choice. I do go out with friends every now and then, but after a while I can't get back home quick enough.
-Would rather sit in silence than talk to other people a lot of the time
-Can't function properly in groups or when I'm being observed by others. I usually just keep my mouth shut until someone asks a question or otherwise engages me, 'cause I'll stutter or slur like mad.
That's mainly the social side of it, but I wanted to know whether there's some way I can get tested for it. If I go to my GP, will they be able to assess this in some way?
Sorry if I sound like an idiot. I'm sure it's been posted a lot of times, but I'd rather ask for myself instead of going off someone else's experience.
There are many, but none will diagnose you definitely. Here's one I think is the most comprehensive.
http://www.rdos.net/eng/Aspie-quiz.php
_________________
Detach ed
Ambivalence
Veteran
Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,613
Location: Peterlee (for Industry)
It's much easier to rule it out than in.
Read this link. If you don't match the criteria (from the information you have provided, I don't think you do - note the (II) section) you can rule it out. If you do match the criteria, ask your doctor. And hope they know what they're doing when it comes to ASDs, which is unfortunately not a given.
_________________
No one has gone missing or died.
The year is still young.
Got a screenshot, but it won't let me post it. 5 post minimum thing.
No idea what it means really, and I'm sure there could be 101 other disorders that fit the same kind of symptoms. I'd put it down to simply being socially inept, but it's not like I don't actually try to be social.
These test is considered more scientific:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aqtest.html
If you have more than 32, it is almost sure that you have an autism spectrum disorder; if you have less than 24, it is almost sure that you haven't.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aqtest.html
If you have more than 32, it is almost sure that you have an autism spectrum disorder; if you have less than 24, it is almost sure that you haven't.
No- if you have more than 32 then you might have an ASD, it is however useful for saying that if you score low enough then you won't be diagnosed with one - but there are enough ways to score high on the AQ that aren't ASDs, that its not "almost sure", and the people who use these in evaluations don't use it as almost sure.
Yes, AQ test is definitely more scientific, IMO. The Aspie quiz is based upon a theory that the autistic mind is more in tune with our caveman ancestors (or something along those lines)--a theory that has yet to be proven. The AQ is a good scientific test. While not designed to give a diagnosis, it will give you some sort of idea. (That being said, there are people on the spectrum who do score lower than 32, and some not on the spectrum who score above it....but it is still a good foundation to use). When I participated in an autism-related study, I was asked to take the AQ test there. This was in the psychology department of a university campus, so scientifically they do see value in that test.
_________________
Diagnosed with classic Autism
AQ score= 48
PDD assessment score= 170 (severe PDD)
EQ=8 SQ=93 (Extreme Systemizer)
Alexithymia Quiz=164/185 (high)
The AQ test also seems to be somewhat based upon a particular hypothesis, namely the hypersystemizing/"extreme male brain" hypothesis (which I consider to be flawed - to me, it appears that hypersystemizing is not the underlying cause of autism, but the result of something else, since there are some autistics who couldn't really be considered hypersystemizers).
The AQ test also seems to be somewhat based upon a particular hypothesis, namely the hypersystemizing/"extreme male brain" hypothesis (which I consider to be flawed - to me, it appears that hypersystemizing is not the underlying cause of autism, but the result of something else, since there are some autistics who couldn't really be considered hypersystemizers).
I agree with you and don't agree that the rdos test only asks questions related to his Neanderthal theory. It's simply a list of possible AS traits and NT traits that in my opinion, display a more accurate range of AS traits.
_________________
Detach ed
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Wechsler IQ test results - what were yours? |
15 Oct 2024, 11:09 pm |
Directions Test for Students |
28 Jul 2024, 6:10 am |
IDR Labs Autistic Traits Test |
06 Oct 2024, 7:13 am |
Reading emotions of people by looking at their eyes test. |
10 Aug 2024, 10:58 am |