I spend much time in technicality land, and one federal case I've been shoveling through is:
JONATHAN LUCKETT v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security (No. 2:09-cv-00037 KJN)
usually at: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/di ... 5/28/0.pdf
The "Five Steps" listed on page 4 of the court case are very relevant, as different sets/variations of impairments can satisfy the definitional finding of "disabled" in many permutations (my epilepsy satisfies Step Two with perfect but difficult to get documentation, while my migraines satisfy both Steps 3 and 5 with differences in evidence).
There is an important loophole about drawing SSDI off of a parent's Social Security Account, that may or may not be available (I lacked old documentation and I made enough in wages to probably also disqualify myself on this, and SSI requires filing for all possible SSDI at the same time for SSI (and losing SSDI rights without a good and difficult initial dispute), but SSA may be in legal violation in a Catch-22 legal challenge). Then, most legal sources note that it is best to appeal all denials, and with a final denial, to file suit in federal district court, as simply filing another new claim loses all former legal rights and possible past benefit payments.
My contested impairments in 1987 involved epilepsy, speech impairments, migraines, and a plethora of complications with epilepsy. If I ever get genetic testing, any new contest would probably include Tuberous Sclerosis Syndrome, which would include epilepsy, autism, etc. as consequential impairments, and a complex legal argument that I am eligible for SSDI under my parent's SS account .
I also sought employment relevant to my university degrees through State Rehab, and when I started filing federal lawsuits against federal employers and the State Rehab, SSA cancelled the scheduled ALJ hearing, and declared me SSI disabled, while State Rehab then used that against my lawsuit with them.
With a university degree, it was also claimed I was over-qualified for many positions, and those court cases ended much like the semi-famous case often googled under "too smart to be a cop". Then, employers never heard of the word "epilepsy", let alone ever regarded it as anything to possibly be known.
I viewed my disabilities in 1987 as being able to be "reasonably accommodated" by employers, but until 2001 or so with a Supreme Court ruling in another case/district, the 9th Circuit held SSI and/or SSDI to be totally disqualifying for being "otherwise qualified", while telling me that SSA "disabled" didn't necessarily mean Rehab "handicapped".
"Residual Functioning Capacity" (more per SSI) is still often determinative in the "stepped" process of disability decisions: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2011/ ... 16.945.pdf
Tadzio
adult pages 503-(512) pages 570-579 child autism page:
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2011/ ... 4PApp1.pdf
http://www.socialsecuritydisabilitylawy ... pairments/
http://www.socialsecuritydisabilitylawy ... ility.html
http://www.socialsecurity-disability.or ... disability