OddDuckNash99 wrote:
The answer is we DON'T know Asperger's is the same as HFA. Slowly, some researchers are speaking out against it, which makes me happy. It doesn't matter if the SYMPTOMS are the same. We need to understand how the two differ from a neurological standpoint. The fact that AS doesn't have a speech delay means that there is something very different going on during development. Even if treatment and diagnosis don't differ, as a neuroscientist, I feel that it is crucial to understand these differences in order to properly understand more about the brain and its functioning. The point is that the whole VIQ/PIQ debate and the speech delay have not been resolved, nor has the reason why those with AS tend to be clumsy and uncoordinated, something not usually seen in HFA. And if this hasn't been fully resolved neuroscientifically, it is a huge mistake wanting to remove AS from the diagnostic criteria. Throwing HFA and AS diagnoses in the same group for research is why I believe ASD research is filled with confounds and findings that are often inconclusive and contradictory of one another.
You don't need a speech delay to be diagnosed with classic autism.
Also, from what I've seen and read, your statement about clumsy and uncoordinated not being usually seen in HFA isn't accurate.
I'm not sure what you refer to as the VIQ/PIQ debate though.
Personally, I've found that it doesn't matter how "severe" or "low functioning" the autism is, I can relate to the people who wrote about themselves. From what I've read from people who are non-verbal and stereotypical LFA, I can relate to how they feel and act, just at a different level than they do - weaker compulsions, weaker avoidance, and such.