And some of it is going to be professional jealousy, for the things you're good at, you're likely to be very good at. And then, you're likely to have some patchy areas like all people, but especially those of us who are Spectrum or 'Spectrum-friendly,' and that makes you easy to attack, which is not so cool on the part of other people.
Okay, one thing, try not to boast about the areas you're good at. And when you're contributing, don't be diplomatic. And this one may be a little surprising, for some people can take an attempt to be diplomatic the wrong way. Instead just be brief and matter-of-fact, such has "Could it be _________? He does have ___________." And sometimes I think being relatively brief without overdoing it may be the most important thing of all.
And allow me to show off a little, for microbiology is an interest of mine. It's a warning sign if a child (or presumably an adult) seems to be recovering from the flu and then relapses with a high fever. This is from the New York Times citing Thomas Frieden (now head of CDC). Okay, so it's a middlebrow source, not the New England Journal of Medicine.
I'm very good at distilling down information and if I was a younger man becoming a doctor, I think I would tell every flu patient, "Now, listen, this is important. If you relapse with high fever . . " And try not to dilulte this with too much additional information. Like art, less is more. So, just merely average in initial patient interaction.
But I'd be quite willing, when necessary, to see the same patient a second or third follow-up. And I think that interchange between theory and practice is what would elevate my game.