Book: The Myth of Autism by Sami Timimi et al

Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 

Woodpeace
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 474
Location: Lancashire, England

28 Mar 2012, 3:44 am

There is a review of the book here: http://www.positiveaboutautism.co.uk/pa ... view_.html .

What are your opinions of the book?



Surfman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,938
Location: Homeward bound

28 Mar 2012, 4:10 am

I think its bollocks. I had never even heard of the word aspergers till 2 years ago.

But boy has aspergers caused some grief in my family!!

Personally, I wish it was diagnosed much more!

Maybe then I would have learnt about ASD's as a young man instead of a 48yr old set in his ways, and avoided some of my lifes sorrowful moments caused by my ignorance of ASD in my family

Bollocks to that book



ByattBrown
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 32
Location: UK

28 Mar 2012, 4:18 am

I think there will be some merit to the book, and that is will apply to some children.

I have seen children who have been misdiagnosed with an ASD, which I am sure happens to much and this book is likely to apply to some on them.

I feel this type of book is making the same mistakes as some doctors, not everyone fits in the same box. While the book will fit some there are so many more it will not.

Maybe change the title to; The Myth of Autism for some children.


_________________
Diagnosed with Dyslexia and Social/Communication problems at 10 and with Aspergers at 19.
Your Aspie score: 162 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 36 of 200


Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

28 Mar 2012, 4:45 am

An unethical publication. The writers don't seem to be concerned about having a negative impact on the people they're ostensibly writing about (that is, us).



MONKEY
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jan 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,896
Location: Stoke, England (sometimes :P)

28 Mar 2012, 4:50 am

I might give this a go, I do think it's a little over diagnosed in young children, especially the milder strains.


_________________
What film do atheists watch on Christmas?
Coincidence on 34th street.


bnky
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 486
Location: England

28 Mar 2012, 8:38 am

Well, I too do think it's overdiagnosed in small children (at least around here). But I don't need to read a book to have that perception. Especially not a book by an author that doesn't seem to have been consistent in the rigour of her researched.
Then again, I'm basing my opinion on this one review and don't otherwise know the reviewer's work.



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

28 Mar 2012, 10:41 am

Maybe the authors have a problem with the blanket term and are trying to encourage us to think of it as people having unique disabilities that are specific to them as individuals. That may be better than labelling. Suppose in school they were able to identify each persons unique strengths and weaknesses, then working on the weaknesses instead of just saying this child has autism.